治疗遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症继发鼻衄的创新方法:将注射硬化剂疗法作为首选治疗方法的演变。

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2024.1456686
Nitish Kumar, Pedro Lança Gomes, Michael J Marino, Amar Miglani, Devyani Lal
{"title":"治疗遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症继发鼻衄的创新方法:将注射硬化剂疗法作为首选治疗方法的演变。","authors":"Nitish Kumar, Pedro Lança Gomes, Michael J Marino, Amar Miglani, Devyani Lal","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2024.1456686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We compared the efficacy of intralesional sclerotherapy using 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate with non-sclerotherapy-based treatments for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia-associated epistaxis management.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical intervention for HHT-associated epistaxis management from 01/2010-02/2024. Patients undergoing sclerotherapy with intralesional 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate were included in the sclerotherapy group and others undergoing conventional non-sclerotherapy-based procedures in the non-sclerotherapy group. Outcomes like breakthrough epistaxis, emergency visits, intra-op blood loss, blood transfusions, and procedure complications in the 3-month perioperative period were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients who underwent 74 intranasal procedures were identified. In the sclerotherapy group, 17 patients underwent 47 procedures. In the non-sclerotherapy group, 10 patients underwent 27 procedures. Till the 3rd post-treatment month, fewer breakthrough epistaxis episodes were observed after sclerotherapy procedures (13/47) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (14/27); (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower during sclerotherapy (median: 10 ml) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (median: 50 ml); <i>p</i> < 0.001. The time interval between successive procedures was not significantly different in the sclerotherapy (median 6.5 months) vs. the non-sclerotherapy group (median 3.5 months); <i>p</i> = 0.13. Nasal crusting was the most common complication in the sclerotherapy group (36.9%). Two patients in each group had new onset septal perforation, none of the patients had vision loss or cerebrovascular accident. One emergency department visit was reported in the sclerotherapy group vs. 7 (in 3 patients) in the non-sclerotherapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to non-sclerotherapy treatments, intralesional sclerotherapy for epistaxis in HHT is more effective in decreasing breakthrough epistaxis, and has lower intraoperative blood loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovations in the management of epistaxis secondary to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: our evolution to injection sclerotherapy as the treatment of choice.\",\"authors\":\"Nitish Kumar, Pedro Lança Gomes, Michael J Marino, Amar Miglani, Devyani Lal\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/falgy.2024.1456686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We compared the efficacy of intralesional sclerotherapy using 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate with non-sclerotherapy-based treatments for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia-associated epistaxis management.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical intervention for HHT-associated epistaxis management from 01/2010-02/2024. Patients undergoing sclerotherapy with intralesional 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate were included in the sclerotherapy group and others undergoing conventional non-sclerotherapy-based procedures in the non-sclerotherapy group. Outcomes like breakthrough epistaxis, emergency visits, intra-op blood loss, blood transfusions, and procedure complications in the 3-month perioperative period were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients who underwent 74 intranasal procedures were identified. In the sclerotherapy group, 17 patients underwent 47 procedures. In the non-sclerotherapy group, 10 patients underwent 27 procedures. Till the 3rd post-treatment month, fewer breakthrough epistaxis episodes were observed after sclerotherapy procedures (13/47) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (14/27); (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower during sclerotherapy (median: 10 ml) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (median: 50 ml); <i>p</i> < 0.001. The time interval between successive procedures was not significantly different in the sclerotherapy (median 6.5 months) vs. the non-sclerotherapy group (median 3.5 months); <i>p</i> = 0.13. Nasal crusting was the most common complication in the sclerotherapy group (36.9%). Two patients in each group had new onset septal perforation, none of the patients had vision loss or cerebrovascular accident. One emergency department visit was reported in the sclerotherapy group vs. 7 (in 3 patients) in the non-sclerotherapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to non-sclerotherapy treatments, intralesional sclerotherapy for epistaxis in HHT is more effective in decreasing breakthrough epistaxis, and has lower intraoperative blood loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1456686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2024.1456686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们比较了使用 3% 十四烷基硫酸钠的局部硬化剂注射疗法和非硬化剂注射疗法治疗遗传性出血性远端血管扩张症相关鼻衄的疗效:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为 2010 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月期间接受手术治疗的 HHT 相关性鼻衄患者。接受3%十四烷基硫酸钠内注射硬化剂治疗的患者被纳入硬化剂治疗组,其他接受常规非硬化剂治疗的患者被纳入非硬化剂治疗组。比较了突破性鼻衄、急诊就诊、术中失血、输血以及围手术期 3 个月的手术并发症等结果:结果:23 名患者接受了 74 例鼻内手术。在硬化剂治疗组中,17 名患者接受了 47 次手术。非硬化剂治疗组中,10 名患者接受了 27 次治疗。直至治疗后第 3 个月,硬化剂治疗术后(13/47)与非硬化剂治疗术后(14/27)相比,突破性鼻衄发作次数更少;(P = 0.037)。硬化疗法的术中失血量(中位数:10 毫升)明显低于非硬化疗法(中位数:50 毫升);P = 0.13。鼻腔结痂是硬化剂治疗组最常见的并发症(36.9%)。每组各有两名患者出现新发鼻中隔穿孔,但没有患者出现视力下降或脑血管意外。硬化剂治疗组有一名患者到急诊室就诊,而非硬化剂治疗组有7名患者(3名患者)到急诊室就诊:结论:与非硬化剂治疗相比,HHT 患者鼻衄的腔内硬化剂治疗能更有效地减少突破性鼻衄,且术中失血量更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovations in the management of epistaxis secondary to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: our evolution to injection sclerotherapy as the treatment of choice.

Introduction: We compared the efficacy of intralesional sclerotherapy using 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate with non-sclerotherapy-based treatments for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia-associated epistaxis management.

Methodology: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical intervention for HHT-associated epistaxis management from 01/2010-02/2024. Patients undergoing sclerotherapy with intralesional 3% sodium tetradecyl sulfate were included in the sclerotherapy group and others undergoing conventional non-sclerotherapy-based procedures in the non-sclerotherapy group. Outcomes like breakthrough epistaxis, emergency visits, intra-op blood loss, blood transfusions, and procedure complications in the 3-month perioperative period were compared.

Results: Twenty-three patients who underwent 74 intranasal procedures were identified. In the sclerotherapy group, 17 patients underwent 47 procedures. In the non-sclerotherapy group, 10 patients underwent 27 procedures. Till the 3rd post-treatment month, fewer breakthrough epistaxis episodes were observed after sclerotherapy procedures (13/47) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (14/27); (p = 0.037). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower during sclerotherapy (median: 10 ml) vs. non-sclerotherapy procedures (median: 50 ml); p < 0.001. The time interval between successive procedures was not significantly different in the sclerotherapy (median 6.5 months) vs. the non-sclerotherapy group (median 3.5 months); p = 0.13. Nasal crusting was the most common complication in the sclerotherapy group (36.9%). Two patients in each group had new onset septal perforation, none of the patients had vision loss or cerebrovascular accident. One emergency department visit was reported in the sclerotherapy group vs. 7 (in 3 patients) in the non-sclerotherapy group.

Conclusions: Compared to non-sclerotherapy treatments, intralesional sclerotherapy for epistaxis in HHT is more effective in decreasing breakthrough epistaxis, and has lower intraoperative blood loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Asthma management in the digital age. Single center experience with more than 600 drug desensitization in Colombia. Editorial: IgE and its receptors in the context of allergy. Innovations in the management of epistaxis secondary to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: our evolution to injection sclerotherapy as the treatment of choice. Association between antibiotic usage during infancy and asthma incidence among children: a population-level ecological study in British Columbia, Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1