对医疗保健中 "遗漏 "的原因和当前解决 "遗漏 "问题的干预措施进行现实主义审查。

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13431.2
Calum Lindsay, David Baruffati, Mhairi Mackenzie, David A Ellis, Michelle Major, Kate O'Donnell, Sharon Simpson, Andrea Williamson, Claire Duddy, Geoff Wong
{"title":"对医疗保健中 \"遗漏 \"的原因和当前解决 \"遗漏 \"问题的干预措施进行现实主义审查。","authors":"Calum Lindsay, David Baruffati, Mhairi Mackenzie, David A Ellis, Michelle Major, Kate O'Donnell, Sharon Simpson, Andrea Williamson, Claire Duddy, Geoff Wong","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13431.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This protocol describes a realist review exploring the problem of \"missingness\" in healthcare, defined as the repeated tendency not to take up offers of care that has a negative impact on the person and their life chances. More specifically, the review looks at the phenomenon of patients missing multiple appointments in primary care in the UK - at the causal factors that influence how patients come to be \"missing\" in this way, and what interventions might support uptake and \"presence\" in healthcare. Background research informing this project suggests that a high rate of missed appointments predicted high premature death rates, and patients were more likely to have multiple long-term health conditions and experience significant socioeconomic disadvantage. Most research in this field focuses on population- or service-level characteristics of patients who miss appointments, often making no distinction between causes of single missed appointments and of multiple missed appointments. There have therefore been no interventions for 'missingness', accounting for the complex life circumstances or common mechanisms that cause people to repeatedly miss appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a realist review approach to explore what causes missingness - and what might prevent or address it - for whom, and in what circumstances. The review uses an iterative approach of database searching, citation-tracking and sourcing grey literature, with selected articles providing insight into the causal dynamics underpinning missed appointments and the interventions designed to address them.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings of this review will be combined with the findings of a qualitative empirical study and the contributions of a Stakeholder Advisory Group (STAG) to inform the development of a programme theory that seeks to explain how missingness occurs, whom it affects and under what circumstances. This will be used to develop a complex intervention to address multiple missed appointments in primary care.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42022346006.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"3 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A realist review of the causes of, and current interventions to address 'missingness' in health care.\",\"authors\":\"Calum Lindsay, David Baruffati, Mhairi Mackenzie, David A Ellis, Michelle Major, Kate O'Donnell, Sharon Simpson, Andrea Williamson, Claire Duddy, Geoff Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13431.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This protocol describes a realist review exploring the problem of \\\"missingness\\\" in healthcare, defined as the repeated tendency not to take up offers of care that has a negative impact on the person and their life chances. More specifically, the review looks at the phenomenon of patients missing multiple appointments in primary care in the UK - at the causal factors that influence how patients come to be \\\"missing\\\" in this way, and what interventions might support uptake and \\\"presence\\\" in healthcare. Background research informing this project suggests that a high rate of missed appointments predicted high premature death rates, and patients were more likely to have multiple long-term health conditions and experience significant socioeconomic disadvantage. Most research in this field focuses on population- or service-level characteristics of patients who miss appointments, often making no distinction between causes of single missed appointments and of multiple missed appointments. There have therefore been no interventions for 'missingness', accounting for the complex life circumstances or common mechanisms that cause people to repeatedly miss appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use a realist review approach to explore what causes missingness - and what might prevent or address it - for whom, and in what circumstances. The review uses an iterative approach of database searching, citation-tracking and sourcing grey literature, with selected articles providing insight into the causal dynamics underpinning missed appointments and the interventions designed to address them.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings of this review will be combined with the findings of a qualitative empirical study and the contributions of a Stakeholder Advisory Group (STAG) to inform the development of a programme theory that seeks to explain how missingness occurs, whom it affects and under what circumstances. This will be used to develop a complex intervention to address multiple missed appointments in primary care.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42022346006.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13431.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13431.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本协议描述了一项现实主义审查,旨在探讨医疗保健中的 "缺失 "问题。"缺失 "是指反复出现的不接受医疗服务的倾向,这对患者及其生活机会造成了负面影响。更具体地说,该研究探讨了英国初级医疗中患者多次爽约的现象--影响患者以这种方式 "爽约 "的因果因素,以及哪些干预措施可以支持患者接受治疗并 "出席 "医疗活动。为该项目提供信息的背景研究表明,高失约率预示着高过早死亡率,患者更有可能患有多种长期健康问题,并处于严重的社会经济劣势。该领域的大多数研究都集中在人口或服务层面的失约患者特征上,通常不区分单次失约和多次失约的原因。因此,没有针对 "失约 "的干预措施,也没有考虑到导致人们反复失约的复杂生活环境或共同机制:方法:我们采用现实主义审查方法来探讨造成失约的原因,以及在什么情况下可以防止或解决失约问题。本综述采用数据库搜索、引文跟踪和灰色文献来源的迭代方法,通过所选文章深入了解造成失约的因果动态以及为解决这些问题而设计的干预措施:本综述的结果将与一项定性实证研究的结果以及利益相关者咨询小组(STAG)的意见相结合,为计划理论的发展提供信息,该理论旨在解释失约是如何发生的、对谁产生影响以及在什么情况下发生。该理论将用于制定一项复杂的干预措施,以解决初级保健中的多次失约问题:CRD42022346006。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A realist review of the causes of, and current interventions to address 'missingness' in health care.

Background: This protocol describes a realist review exploring the problem of "missingness" in healthcare, defined as the repeated tendency not to take up offers of care that has a negative impact on the person and their life chances. More specifically, the review looks at the phenomenon of patients missing multiple appointments in primary care in the UK - at the causal factors that influence how patients come to be "missing" in this way, and what interventions might support uptake and "presence" in healthcare. Background research informing this project suggests that a high rate of missed appointments predicted high premature death rates, and patients were more likely to have multiple long-term health conditions and experience significant socioeconomic disadvantage. Most research in this field focuses on population- or service-level characteristics of patients who miss appointments, often making no distinction between causes of single missed appointments and of multiple missed appointments. There have therefore been no interventions for 'missingness', accounting for the complex life circumstances or common mechanisms that cause people to repeatedly miss appointments.

Methods: We use a realist review approach to explore what causes missingness - and what might prevent or address it - for whom, and in what circumstances. The review uses an iterative approach of database searching, citation-tracking and sourcing grey literature, with selected articles providing insight into the causal dynamics underpinning missed appointments and the interventions designed to address them.

Discussion: The findings of this review will be combined with the findings of a qualitative empirical study and the contributions of a Stakeholder Advisory Group (STAG) to inform the development of a programme theory that seeks to explain how missingness occurs, whom it affects and under what circumstances. This will be used to develop a complex intervention to address multiple missed appointments in primary care.

Prospero registration: CRD42022346006.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review. Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection. Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol. Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study. The UK Breast Cancer in Pregnancy (UKBCiP) Study. Incidence, diagnosis, management and short-term outcomes of breast cancer first diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom: A population-based descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1