使用伯格平衡量表和潜等级理论对亚急性脑卒中患者的平衡功能进行分级

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10282
Shuntaro Tamura, Kazuhiro Miyata, Sota Kobayashi, Ren Takeda, Hiroki Iwamoto
{"title":"使用伯格平衡量表和潜等级理论对亚急性脑卒中患者的平衡功能进行分级","authors":"Shuntaro Tamura, Kazuhiro Miyata, Sota Kobayashi, Ren Takeda, Hiroki Iwamoto","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a core measure of balance function in patients with stroke. Latent rank theory (LRT) is a statistical method that enables the degree of functional impairment to be ranked from the sub-items of a rating scale; each rank can then be characterized. Identification of the characteristics of balance function by rank would be beneficial for interventions to improve balance function in patients with stroke. This study aims to use LRT to rank and characterize patients with stroke balance impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 293 patients with subacute stroke. We used LRT and the BBS to estimate the optimal rankings based on the goodness-of-fit index and the information criterion. We compared the obtained ranks with the level of walking independence for each rank.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation of the patient's BBS scores revealed that balance impairment could be divided into six ranks. The average BBS score for each rank rose from 27.1 for rank 1 to 53.9 for rank 6. The scores of the BBS sub-items for each rank also differed. The level of walking independence by rank ranged from rank 1 for assisted walking to rank 6 for independent outdoor walking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balance function in patients with subacute stroke was ranked sixth in the BBS, with varying characteristics identified for different ranks. This result helped to determine the therapy to improve the balance function of patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"27 2","pages":"76-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grading of Balance Function in Subacute Stroke Patients by Using the Berg Balance Scale Together with Latent Rank Theory.\",\"authors\":\"Shuntaro Tamura, Kazuhiro Miyata, Sota Kobayashi, Ren Takeda, Hiroki Iwamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1298/ptr.E10282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a core measure of balance function in patients with stroke. Latent rank theory (LRT) is a statistical method that enables the degree of functional impairment to be ranked from the sub-items of a rating scale; each rank can then be characterized. Identification of the characteristics of balance function by rank would be beneficial for interventions to improve balance function in patients with stroke. This study aims to use LRT to rank and characterize patients with stroke balance impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 293 patients with subacute stroke. We used LRT and the BBS to estimate the optimal rankings based on the goodness-of-fit index and the information criterion. We compared the obtained ranks with the level of walking independence for each rank.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation of the patient's BBS scores revealed that balance impairment could be divided into six ranks. The average BBS score for each rank rose from 27.1 for rank 1 to 53.9 for rank 6. The scores of the BBS sub-items for each rank also differed. The level of walking independence by rank ranged from rank 1 for assisted walking to rank 6 for independent outdoor walking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balance function in patients with subacute stroke was ranked sixth in the BBS, with varying characteristics identified for different ranks. This result helped to determine the therapy to improve the balance function of patients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"76-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382790/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:伯格平衡量表(BBS)是衡量中风患者平衡功能的核心指标。潜在等级理论(LRT)是一种统计方法,可以根据评分量表的分项对功能障碍程度进行等级划分,然后对每个等级进行特征描述。按等级确定平衡功能的特征将有利于采取干预措施改善中风患者的平衡功能。本研究旨在使用 LRT 对脑卒中平衡障碍患者进行分级和特征描述:这是对 293 名亚急性脑卒中患者进行的多中心回顾性分析。我们使用 LRT 和 BBS 根据拟合优度指数和信息标准估算出最佳排名。我们将获得的等级与每个等级的行走独立性水平进行了比较:对患者的 BBS 评分进行评估后发现,平衡障碍可分为六个等级。每个等级的 BBS 平均得分从第 1 级的 27.1 分上升到第 6 级的 53.9 分。每个等级的 BBS 分项得分也各不相同。各等级的独立行走水平从第 1 级的辅助行走到第 6 级的独立户外行走不等:结论:亚急性脑卒中患者的平衡功能在 BBS 中排名第六,不同等级的平衡功能具有不同的特征。这一结果有助于确定改善脑卒中患者平衡功能的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grading of Balance Function in Subacute Stroke Patients by Using the Berg Balance Scale Together with Latent Rank Theory.

Objectives: The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a core measure of balance function in patients with stroke. Latent rank theory (LRT) is a statistical method that enables the degree of functional impairment to be ranked from the sub-items of a rating scale; each rank can then be characterized. Identification of the characteristics of balance function by rank would be beneficial for interventions to improve balance function in patients with stroke. This study aims to use LRT to rank and characterize patients with stroke balance impairment.

Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 293 patients with subacute stroke. We used LRT and the BBS to estimate the optimal rankings based on the goodness-of-fit index and the information criterion. We compared the obtained ranks with the level of walking independence for each rank.

Results: The evaluation of the patient's BBS scores revealed that balance impairment could be divided into six ranks. The average BBS score for each rank rose from 27.1 for rank 1 to 53.9 for rank 6. The scores of the BBS sub-items for each rank also differed. The level of walking independence by rank ranged from rank 1 for assisted walking to rank 6 for independent outdoor walking.

Conclusions: Balance function in patients with subacute stroke was ranked sixth in the BBS, with varying characteristics identified for different ranks. This result helped to determine the therapy to improve the balance function of patients with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Decision Tree Analysis Model for Predicting Home Discharge in a Convalescent Ward: A Single Institution Study. Early Ambulation Following Lung Resection Surgery: Impact on Short-term Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer. Effects of Isometric Quadriceps Muscle Exercise with Visual and Auditory Feedback at 1 Year after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Family-centered Care for Children with Disabilities in Japan-the Origin and Future of the "Ryouiku". The Assessment and Response of Rehabilitation Professionals to Sudden Deterioration in Symptoms: An Analysis of the National Database in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1