社会经济贫困与单次门诊接受长效可逆避孕药具之间的关系。

Mary D Carmody, Danielle G Tsevat, Lindsey Yates, Gretchen Stuart, Kavita S Arora
{"title":"社会经济贫困与单次门诊接受长效可逆避孕药具之间的关系。","authors":"Mary D Carmody, Danielle G Tsevat, Lindsey Yates, Gretchen Stuart, Kavita S Arora","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the relationship between area deprivation index (ADI) and obtaining single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We utilized Poisson regression to determine the association between area deprivation and single-visit LARC insertion within a state-wide healthcare system between 2019-2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among our cohort (N = 4417), 68.60% of patients desiring LARC obtained single-visit LARC. Participants living in high deprivation areas were less likely to receive single-visit LARC (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Living in areas of high deprivation is independently negatively associated with obtaining a single-visit LARC.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>While access to single-visit LARC should be universally improved, reducing barriers for patientswith a higher ADI may help limit inequities in reproductive healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between socio-economic deprivation and receipt of long-acting reversible contraception at a single clinic visit.\",\"authors\":\"Mary D Carmody, Danielle G Tsevat, Lindsey Yates, Gretchen Stuart, Kavita S Arora\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the relationship between area deprivation index (ADI) and obtaining single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We utilized Poisson regression to determine the association between area deprivation and single-visit LARC insertion within a state-wide healthcare system between 2019-2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among our cohort (N = 4417), 68.60% of patients desiring LARC obtained single-visit LARC. Participants living in high deprivation areas were less likely to receive single-visit LARC (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Living in areas of high deprivation is independently negatively associated with obtaining a single-visit LARC.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>While access to single-visit LARC should be universally improved, reducing barriers for patientswith a higher ADI may help limit inequities in reproductive healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:确定居住在高度贫困地区与获得单次长效可逆避孕药具之间的关系:研究设计:研究设计:我们利用泊松回归法确定了2019-2021年间全州医疗保健系统中地区贫困与单次就诊LARC植入之间的关系:在我们的队列(N=4,417)中,68.60%需要LARC的患者获得了单次LARC,23.70%生活在高贫困地区。生活在高贫困地区的参与者接受单次LARC的可能性较低(aRR为0.72,95% CI为0.65-0.80):结论:需要减少社会经济贫困地区患者获得理想医疗服务的障碍,以减少生殖医疗服务中的不公平现象:虽然应普遍改善单次就诊 LARC 的可及性,但仍需注意减少为 ADI 较高的患者提供护理的临床机构的障碍,并最终帮助限制生殖保健方面的进一步不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association between socio-economic deprivation and receipt of long-acting reversible contraception at a single clinic visit.

Objectives: To determine the relationship between area deprivation index (ADI) and obtaining single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

Study design: We utilized Poisson regression to determine the association between area deprivation and single-visit LARC insertion within a state-wide healthcare system between 2019-2021.

Results: Among our cohort (N = 4417), 68.60% of patients desiring LARC obtained single-visit LARC. Participants living in high deprivation areas were less likely to receive single-visit LARC (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80).

Conclusions: Living in areas of high deprivation is independently negatively associated with obtaining a single-visit LARC.

Implications: While access to single-visit LARC should be universally improved, reducing barriers for patientswith a higher ADI may help limit inequities in reproductive healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation. Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study. Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge. The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1