在霍奇金淋巴瘤强化治疗方案中,低剂量达卡巴嗪(改良 BEACODD)是一种更安全且疗效相同的策略:对巴西一家公立中心的初步回顾性分析。

Larissa Hilario Dulley, Arthur Gomes Oliveira Braga, Guilherme Garcia Rodrigues, Sergio Costa Fortier, Carlos Sérgio Chiattone, Talita Maira Bueno da Silveira
{"title":"在霍奇金淋巴瘤强化治疗方案中,低剂量达卡巴嗪(改良 BEACODD)是一种更安全且疗效相同的策略:对巴西一家公立中心的初步回顾性分析。","authors":"Larissa Hilario Dulley, Arthur Gomes Oliveira Braga, Guilherme Garcia Rodrigues, Sergio Costa Fortier, Carlos Sérgio Chiattone, Talita Maira Bueno da Silveira","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The German Hodgkin Study Group developed the escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) protocol as a treatment strategy for advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. In Brazil, as well as in other countries, procarbazine has been replaced with dacarbazine due to the limited availability of procarbazine. The Hematology Center at Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia in São Paulo adopted and modified the escalated BEACOPP protocol, substituting prednisone with dexamethasone and incorporating two different doses of dacarbazine: 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day on Day 8 or the original dose of 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day on Days 2 and 3. This adjustment was made in response to the anticipated toxicity profile. This study aimed to compare the two different doses in the protocols (375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle versus 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle) administered to patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma in similar periods. This retrospective study analyzed the data of 31 patients at a single center in Brazil from 2019 to 2021. Seventeen of the 31 patients received 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle (500 Group), while 14 received 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle (375 Group). At the end of the protocol, 71% of the patients in the 375 Group and 76% in the 500 Group achieved complete remission. On analyzing the number of cycles that patients presented with febrile neutropenia, the 500 Group had three times more events (17.9%) than the 375 Group (6.09% - p-value = 0.04). In the 500 Group, 47.1% needed to change the protocol to ABVD (doxorubicin hydrochloride, bleomycin sulfate, vinblastine sulfate, and dacarbazine) due to toxicity. In this limited cohort from a single public center in Brazil, the use of 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> of dacarbazine per cycle of the modified escalated BEACOPP protocol emerged as a safer strategy, maintaining treatment efficacy without compromising response in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":94026,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower doses of dacarbazine (modified BEACODD) as a safer strategy with equal effectiveness in an intensive treatment protocol of Hodgkin's lymphoma: a preliminary retrospective analysis of a single public center in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Hilario Dulley, Arthur Gomes Oliveira Braga, Guilherme Garcia Rodrigues, Sergio Costa Fortier, Carlos Sérgio Chiattone, Talita Maira Bueno da Silveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.htct.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The German Hodgkin Study Group developed the escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) protocol as a treatment strategy for advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. In Brazil, as well as in other countries, procarbazine has been replaced with dacarbazine due to the limited availability of procarbazine. The Hematology Center at Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia in São Paulo adopted and modified the escalated BEACOPP protocol, substituting prednisone with dexamethasone and incorporating two different doses of dacarbazine: 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day on Day 8 or the original dose of 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day on Days 2 and 3. This adjustment was made in response to the anticipated toxicity profile. This study aimed to compare the two different doses in the protocols (375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle versus 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle) administered to patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma in similar periods. This retrospective study analyzed the data of 31 patients at a single center in Brazil from 2019 to 2021. Seventeen of the 31 patients received 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle (500 Group), while 14 received 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/cycle (375 Group). At the end of the protocol, 71% of the patients in the 375 Group and 76% in the 500 Group achieved complete remission. On analyzing the number of cycles that patients presented with febrile neutropenia, the 500 Group had three times more events (17.9%) than the 375 Group (6.09% - p-value = 0.04). In the 500 Group, 47.1% needed to change the protocol to ABVD (doxorubicin hydrochloride, bleomycin sulfate, vinblastine sulfate, and dacarbazine) due to toxicity. In this limited cohort from a single public center in Brazil, the use of 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> of dacarbazine per cycle of the modified escalated BEACOPP protocol emerged as a safer strategy, maintaining treatment efficacy without compromising response in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2024.06.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2024.06.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国霍奇金研究小组制定了升级版 BEACOPP(博来霉素、依托泊苷、多柔比星、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、丙卡巴嗪和泼尼松)方案,作为晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的治疗策略。在巴西和其他国家,由于丙卡巴嗪的供应有限,丙卡巴嗪已被达卡巴嗪取代。圣保罗的圣母玛利亚医院(Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia)血液学中心采用并修改了升级版 BEACOPP 方案,用地塞米松取代了泼尼松,并加入了两种不同剂量的达卡巴嗪:第 8 天为 375 毫克/平方米/天,第 2 天和第 3 天为原来的 250 毫克/平方米/天。这一调整是根据预期的毒性情况做出的。这项研究旨在比较两种不同剂量的方案(375 毫克/平方米/周期与 500 毫克/平方米/周期)在相似时期对晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的治疗效果。这项回顾性研究分析了巴西一家中心在2019年至2021年期间31名患者的数据。31 名患者中有 17 人接受了 500 毫克/平方米/周期(500 组)治疗,14 人接受了 375 毫克/平方米/周期(375 组)治疗。在方案结束时,375 组和 500 组分别有 71% 和 76% 的患者实现了完全缓解。在分析患者出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症的周期数时,500 组(17.9%)是 375 组(6.09% - P 值 = 0.04)的三倍。在 500 组中,47.1% 的患者因毒性而需要将治疗方案改为 ABVD(盐酸多柔比星、硫酸博来霉素、硫酸长春碱和达卡巴嗪)。在这个来自巴西一家公立中心的有限队列中,在改良升级BEACOPP方案中,每个周期使用375毫克/平方米达卡巴嗪是一种更安全的策略,既能维持晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的疗效,又不影响其反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lower doses of dacarbazine (modified BEACODD) as a safer strategy with equal effectiveness in an intensive treatment protocol of Hodgkin's lymphoma: a preliminary retrospective analysis of a single public center in Brazil.

The German Hodgkin Study Group developed the escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) protocol as a treatment strategy for advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. In Brazil, as well as in other countries, procarbazine has been replaced with dacarbazine due to the limited availability of procarbazine. The Hematology Center at Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia in São Paulo adopted and modified the escalated BEACOPP protocol, substituting prednisone with dexamethasone and incorporating two different doses of dacarbazine: 375 mg/m2/day on Day 8 or the original dose of 250 mg/m2/day on Days 2 and 3. This adjustment was made in response to the anticipated toxicity profile. This study aimed to compare the two different doses in the protocols (375 mg/m2/cycle versus 500 mg/m2/cycle) administered to patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma in similar periods. This retrospective study analyzed the data of 31 patients at a single center in Brazil from 2019 to 2021. Seventeen of the 31 patients received 500 mg/m2/cycle (500 Group), while 14 received 375 mg/m2/cycle (375 Group). At the end of the protocol, 71% of the patients in the 375 Group and 76% in the 500 Group achieved complete remission. On analyzing the number of cycles that patients presented with febrile neutropenia, the 500 Group had three times more events (17.9%) than the 375 Group (6.09% - p-value = 0.04). In the 500 Group, 47.1% needed to change the protocol to ABVD (doxorubicin hydrochloride, bleomycin sulfate, vinblastine sulfate, and dacarbazine) due to toxicity. In this limited cohort from a single public center in Brazil, the use of 375 mg/m2 of dacarbazine per cycle of the modified escalated BEACOPP protocol emerged as a safer strategy, maintaining treatment efficacy without compromising response in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Familial acute myeloid leukemia due to a novel germline CEBPA pathogenic variant - a case report. Hemolytic anemia due to pyruvate kinase deficiency coexistent with the alpha thalassemia trait and chronic myeloid leukemia. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Case report. Minor surgical procedures during immune tolerance induction in people with hemophilia A and inhibitors: results from the Brazilian Immune Tolerance (BrazIT) study cohort. Psychological aspects in young people with venous thromboembolic disease, preliminary report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1