通过聚类分析,可以确定哪些抗真菌药物对从颌面部软组织炎症患者中分离出来的白色念珠菌具有疗效。

IF 3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Frontiers in oral health Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/froh.2024.1446045
Mariia Faustova, Volodymyr Dobrovolskyi, Galina Loban', Yevhenii Bereza, Aleksandra Kotelnikova, Oleksandr Dobrovolskyi
{"title":"通过聚类分析,可以确定哪些抗真菌药物对从颌面部软组织炎症患者中分离出来的白色念珠菌具有疗效。","authors":"Mariia Faustova, Volodymyr Dobrovolskyi, Galina Loban', Yevhenii Bereza, Aleksandra Kotelnikova, Oleksandr Dobrovolskyi","doi":"10.3389/froh.2024.1446045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians are increasingly prescribing antifungal drugs empirically to treat hospital-acquired infections quickly. This makes it obvious that fungal infections require more attention and systematic monitoring of resistance among them. The aim of the study was to identify antifungal drugs that retain their efficacy against <i>C. albicans</i> isolates. There were 17 clinical isolates of <i>Candida albicans</i> obtained from patients and tested for susceptibility to antifungal drugs using the standard double dilution method. Amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, micafungin, and posaconazole were used in the study. To determine the groups of antimycotics to which the studied microorganisms retain sensitivity, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using the Ward's method. The tested representatives of the genus <i>Candida</i> showed the lowest sensitivity to fluconazole. The efficacy of amphotericin B and itraconazole was almost at the same level. In turn, micafungin and posaconazole showed the best results against <i>C. albicans isolates</i>. Ward's cluster analysis combined the results of <i>C. albicans</i> susceptibility to fluconazole, micafungin and itraconazole by the highest mathematical similarity. Amphotericin B and posaconazole were combined into one cluster due to their better efficacy against <i>Candida albicans</i> isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in oral health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cluster analysis allowed to identify antifungal drugs that retain efficacy against <i>Candida albicans</i> isolated from patients with inflammatory diseases of the soft tissues of the maxillofacial area.\",\"authors\":\"Mariia Faustova, Volodymyr Dobrovolskyi, Galina Loban', Yevhenii Bereza, Aleksandra Kotelnikova, Oleksandr Dobrovolskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/froh.2024.1446045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physicians are increasingly prescribing antifungal drugs empirically to treat hospital-acquired infections quickly. This makes it obvious that fungal infections require more attention and systematic monitoring of resistance among them. The aim of the study was to identify antifungal drugs that retain their efficacy against <i>C. albicans</i> isolates. There were 17 clinical isolates of <i>Candida albicans</i> obtained from patients and tested for susceptibility to antifungal drugs using the standard double dilution method. Amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, micafungin, and posaconazole were used in the study. To determine the groups of antimycotics to which the studied microorganisms retain sensitivity, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using the Ward's method. The tested representatives of the genus <i>Candida</i> showed the lowest sensitivity to fluconazole. The efficacy of amphotericin B and itraconazole was almost at the same level. In turn, micafungin and posaconazole showed the best results against <i>C. albicans isolates</i>. Ward's cluster analysis combined the results of <i>C. albicans</i> susceptibility to fluconazole, micafungin and itraconazole by the highest mathematical similarity. Amphotericin B and posaconazole were combined into one cluster due to their better efficacy against <i>Candida albicans</i> isolates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412946/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1446045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1446045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生越来越多地根据经验开具抗真菌药物处方,以快速治疗医院感染。因此,真菌感染显然需要得到更多关注,并对其中的耐药性进行系统监测。这项研究的目的是找出对白念珠菌分离株保持疗效的抗真菌药物。研究人员从患者身上采集了 17 株临床分离的白色念珠菌,并采用标准的双重稀释法检测了这些念珠菌对抗真菌药物的敏感性。研究中使用了两性霉素 B、氟康唑、伊曲康唑、米卡芬净和泊沙康唑。为了确定所研究的微生物对哪几类抗霉菌药物保持敏感性,研究人员使用沃德方法进行了分层聚类分析。接受测试的白色念珠菌属对氟康唑的敏感性最低。两性霉素 B 和伊曲康唑的药效几乎处于同一水平。而米卡芬净和泊沙康唑对白念珠菌分离物的效果最好。沃德聚类分析将白僵菌对氟康唑、米卡芬净和伊曲康唑的敏感性结果以最高的数学相似性合并在一起。由于两性霉素 B 和泊沙康唑对白色念珠菌分离株的疗效更好,因此将这两种药物合并为一个聚类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cluster analysis allowed to identify antifungal drugs that retain efficacy against Candida albicans isolated from patients with inflammatory diseases of the soft tissues of the maxillofacial area.

Physicians are increasingly prescribing antifungal drugs empirically to treat hospital-acquired infections quickly. This makes it obvious that fungal infections require more attention and systematic monitoring of resistance among them. The aim of the study was to identify antifungal drugs that retain their efficacy against C. albicans isolates. There were 17 clinical isolates of Candida albicans obtained from patients and tested for susceptibility to antifungal drugs using the standard double dilution method. Amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, micafungin, and posaconazole were used in the study. To determine the groups of antimycotics to which the studied microorganisms retain sensitivity, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using the Ward's method. The tested representatives of the genus Candida showed the lowest sensitivity to fluconazole. The efficacy of amphotericin B and itraconazole was almost at the same level. In turn, micafungin and posaconazole showed the best results against C. albicans isolates. Ward's cluster analysis combined the results of C. albicans susceptibility to fluconazole, micafungin and itraconazole by the highest mathematical similarity. Amphotericin B and posaconazole were combined into one cluster due to their better efficacy against Candida albicans isolates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Oral health-related beliefs among a sample of pregnant women in Southwestern Ontario: a descriptive study. Oral biofilm composition and phenotype in caries-active and caries-free children. The oral microbiome of children in health and disease-a literature review. Uptake of the Interim Canada Dental Benefit: an investigation of data from the first 18 months of the program. Aesthetic lip filler augmentation is not free of adverse reactions: lack of evidence-based practice from a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1