比较不同类别标签层次的嵌入式可视化的通用框架。

Trevor Manz, Fritz Lekschas, Evan Greene, Greg Finak, Nils Gehlenborg
{"title":"比较不同类别标签层次的嵌入式可视化的通用框架。","authors":"Trevor Manz, Fritz Lekschas, Evan Greene, Greg Finak, Nils Gehlenborg","doi":"10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Projecting high-dimensional vectors into two dimensions for visualization, known as embedding visualization, facilitates perceptual reasoning and interpretation. Comparing multiple embedding visualizations drives decision-making in many domains, but traditional comparison methods are limited by a reliance on direct point correspondences. This requirement precludes comparisons without point correspondences, such as two different datasets of annotated images, and fails to capture meaningful higher-level relationships among point groups. To address these shortcomings, we propose a general framework for comparing embedding visualizations based on shared class labels rather than individual points. Our approach partitions points into regions corresponding to three key class concepts-confusion, neighborhood, and relative size-to characterize intra- and inter-class relationships. Informed by a preliminary user study, we implemented our framework using perceptual neighborhood graphs to defne these regions and introduced metrics to quantify each concept. We demonstrate the generality of our framework with usage scenarios from machine learning and single-cell biology, highlighting our metrics' ability to draw insightful comparisons across label hierarchies. To assess the effectiveness of our approach, we conducted an evaluation study with fve machine learning researchers and six single-cell biologists using an interactive and scalable prototype built with Python, JavaScript, and Rust. Our metrics enable more structured comparisons through visual guidance and increased participants' confdence in their fndings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94035,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A General Framework for Comparing Embedding Visualizations Across Class-Label Hierarchies.\",\"authors\":\"Trevor Manz, Fritz Lekschas, Evan Greene, Greg Finak, Nils Gehlenborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Projecting high-dimensional vectors into two dimensions for visualization, known as embedding visualization, facilitates perceptual reasoning and interpretation. Comparing multiple embedding visualizations drives decision-making in many domains, but traditional comparison methods are limited by a reliance on direct point correspondences. This requirement precludes comparisons without point correspondences, such as two different datasets of annotated images, and fails to capture meaningful higher-level relationships among point groups. To address these shortcomings, we propose a general framework for comparing embedding visualizations based on shared class labels rather than individual points. Our approach partitions points into regions corresponding to three key class concepts-confusion, neighborhood, and relative size-to characterize intra- and inter-class relationships. Informed by a preliminary user study, we implemented our framework using perceptual neighborhood graphs to defne these regions and introduced metrics to quantify each concept. We demonstrate the generality of our framework with usage scenarios from machine learning and single-cell biology, highlighting our metrics' ability to draw insightful comparisons across label hierarchies. To assess the effectiveness of our approach, we conducted an evaluation study with fve machine learning researchers and six single-cell biologists using an interactive and scalable prototype built with Python, JavaScript, and Rust. Our metrics enable more structured comparisons through visual guidance and increased participants' confdence in their fndings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics\",\"volume\":\"PP \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将高维向量投影到两个维度进行可视化,即嵌入可视化,有助于感知推理和解释。比较多个嵌入式可视化可推动许多领域的决策,但传统的比较方法因依赖于直接的点对应关系而受到限制。这种要求排除了没有点对应关系的比较,例如两个不同数据集的注释图像,也无法捕捉点组之间有意义的高层关系。为了解决这些缺陷,我们提出了一个通用框架,用于比较基于共享类标签而非单个点的嵌入可视化。我们的方法将点划分为与三个关键类概念--混淆、邻近和相对大小--相对应的区域,以描述类内和类间的关系。在初步用户研究的基础上,我们使用感知邻域图来定义这些区域,并引入指标来量化每个概念,从而实现了我们的框架。我们通过机器学习和单细胞生物学的使用场景来展示我们框架的通用性,突出了我们的度量标准在跨标签层次结构之间进行深入比较的能力。为了评估我们方法的有效性,我们与五位机器学习研究人员和六位单细胞生物学家进行了一项评估研究,使用的是用 Python、JavaScript 和 Rust 构建的交互式可扩展原型。我们的度量方法通过可视化指导实现了更有条理的比较,并增强了参与者对其发现的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A General Framework for Comparing Embedding Visualizations Across Class-Label Hierarchies.

Projecting high-dimensional vectors into two dimensions for visualization, known as embedding visualization, facilitates perceptual reasoning and interpretation. Comparing multiple embedding visualizations drives decision-making in many domains, but traditional comparison methods are limited by a reliance on direct point correspondences. This requirement precludes comparisons without point correspondences, such as two different datasets of annotated images, and fails to capture meaningful higher-level relationships among point groups. To address these shortcomings, we propose a general framework for comparing embedding visualizations based on shared class labels rather than individual points. Our approach partitions points into regions corresponding to three key class concepts-confusion, neighborhood, and relative size-to characterize intra- and inter-class relationships. Informed by a preliminary user study, we implemented our framework using perceptual neighborhood graphs to defne these regions and introduced metrics to quantify each concept. We demonstrate the generality of our framework with usage scenarios from machine learning and single-cell biology, highlighting our metrics' ability to draw insightful comparisons across label hierarchies. To assess the effectiveness of our approach, we conducted an evaluation study with fve machine learning researchers and six single-cell biologists using an interactive and scalable prototype built with Python, JavaScript, and Rust. Our metrics enable more structured comparisons through visual guidance and increased participants' confdence in their fndings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Table of Contents VIS 2024 Executive Committee VIS 2024 Program Committee 2024 VGTC Visualization Technical Achievement Award
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1