阴囊创伤的治疗和结果。

Moshe Wald
{"title":"阴囊创伤的治疗和结果。","authors":"Moshe Wald","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Genitourinary tract injuries have been reported to account for 3% to 10% of trauma patients, and scrotal injuries have been reported to comprise 71% of male genital trauma. Scrotal trauma is particularly prevalent in males 10 to 30 years of age, thus posing a potential threat to fertility. Scrotal trauma can be blunt or penetrating in nature, and the mechanism of trauma can have an impact on the management and outcomes of this type of injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of adult patients who presented with scrotal trauma to a single large level I trauma center from January 1, 2000, to June 1, 2022, was conducted to assess the relative occurrence and type of trauma (blunt vs penetrating), as well as differences in the management, duration of hospital stay, and need for orchiectomy between these 2 types of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 102 patients included in this study, with an average age of 39.5 years (18.7-77.2 years). Fifty-six patients had blunt scrotal trauma, and 46 had penetrating scrotal injury. There was not a statistically significant difference in the percentages of blunt versus penetrating trauma (<i>P <</i> = 0.3729). Patients with penetrating trauma were more likely to be inpatient than those with blunt trauma (69.6% vs 42.9%; <i>P <</i> = 0.013; 95% CI, 0.062-0.473). A total of 61 patients were treated conservatively (44 and 17 patients in the blunt and penetrating trauma groups, respectively). Overall, 41 patients required surgical intervention: 12 who had blunt trauma and 29 who suffered penetrating injury. Surgical treatment was more common for penetrating trauma than for blunt trauma (63.0% vs 21.4%; <i>P <</i>0.0001; 95% CI, 0.220-0.612). Eleven patients underwent orchiectomy - 4 from the blunt trauma group and 7 from the penetrating trauma group; the rate of orchiectomy was not significantly different between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, blunt scrotal trauma was slightly more common than penetrating injury, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Blunt scrotal trauma was associated with a higher rate of conservative treatment. Further study is needed to better understand the impact of scrotal trauma on future fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scrotal Trauma Treatment and Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Moshe Wald\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Genitourinary tract injuries have been reported to account for 3% to 10% of trauma patients, and scrotal injuries have been reported to comprise 71% of male genital trauma. Scrotal trauma is particularly prevalent in males 10 to 30 years of age, thus posing a potential threat to fertility. Scrotal trauma can be blunt or penetrating in nature, and the mechanism of trauma can have an impact on the management and outcomes of this type of injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of adult patients who presented with scrotal trauma to a single large level I trauma center from January 1, 2000, to June 1, 2022, was conducted to assess the relative occurrence and type of trauma (blunt vs penetrating), as well as differences in the management, duration of hospital stay, and need for orchiectomy between these 2 types of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 102 patients included in this study, with an average age of 39.5 years (18.7-77.2 years). Fifty-six patients had blunt scrotal trauma, and 46 had penetrating scrotal injury. There was not a statistically significant difference in the percentages of blunt versus penetrating trauma (<i>P <</i> = 0.3729). Patients with penetrating trauma were more likely to be inpatient than those with blunt trauma (69.6% vs 42.9%; <i>P <</i> = 0.013; 95% CI, 0.062-0.473). A total of 61 patients were treated conservatively (44 and 17 patients in the blunt and penetrating trauma groups, respectively). Overall, 41 patients required surgical intervention: 12 who had blunt trauma and 29 who suffered penetrating injury. Surgical treatment was more common for penetrating trauma than for blunt trauma (63.0% vs 21.4%; <i>P <</i>0.0001; 95% CI, 0.220-0.612). Eleven patients underwent orchiectomy - 4 from the blunt trauma group and 7 from the penetrating trauma group; the rate of orchiectomy was not significantly different between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, blunt scrotal trauma was slightly more common than penetrating injury, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Blunt scrotal trauma was associated with a higher rate of conservative treatment. Further study is needed to better understand the impact of scrotal trauma on future fertility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:据报道,泌尿生殖道损伤占外伤患者的 3% 至 10%,而阴囊损伤占男性生殖器外伤的 71%。阴囊外伤在 10 至 30 岁的男性中尤为常见,因此对生育能力构成潜在威胁。阴囊外伤的性质可以是钝性的,也可以是穿透性的,外伤的机制会对这类损伤的处理和结果产生影响:方法:我们对 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 1 日期间在一家大型一级创伤中心就诊的阴囊创伤成年患者进行了回顾性病历审查,以评估这两种类型创伤的相对发生率、创伤类型(钝性创伤与穿透性创伤),以及在处理方法、住院时间和睾丸切除术需求方面的差异:本研究共纳入 102 名患者,平均年龄为 39.5 岁(18.7-77.2 岁)。56名患者为钝性阴囊外伤,46名患者为穿透性阴囊损伤。钝性外伤与穿透性外伤的百分比差异无统计学意义(P = 0.3729)。与钝性创伤相比,穿透性创伤患者更有可能住院治疗(69.6% 对 42.9%;P = 0.013;95% CI,0.062-0.473)。共有 61 名患者接受了保守治疗(钝性创伤组和穿透性创伤组分别有 44 名和 17 名患者)。共有 41 名患者需要手术治疗:其中钝性外伤 12 人,穿透性损伤 29 人。穿透性创伤的手术治疗比例高于钝性创伤(63.0% 对 21.4%;P 0.0001;95% CI,0.220-0.612)。11名患者接受了睾丸切除术,其中4人来自钝性创伤组,7人来自穿透性创伤组;两组患者的睾丸切除率无显著差异:在这项研究中,钝性阴囊外伤比穿透性损伤更常见,但两者之间的差异没有统计学意义。钝性阴囊外伤与较高的保守治疗率有关。要更好地了解阴囊外伤对未来生育能力的影响,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scrotal Trauma Treatment and Outcomes.

Introduction: Genitourinary tract injuries have been reported to account for 3% to 10% of trauma patients, and scrotal injuries have been reported to comprise 71% of male genital trauma. Scrotal trauma is particularly prevalent in males 10 to 30 years of age, thus posing a potential threat to fertility. Scrotal trauma can be blunt or penetrating in nature, and the mechanism of trauma can have an impact on the management and outcomes of this type of injury.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients who presented with scrotal trauma to a single large level I trauma center from January 1, 2000, to June 1, 2022, was conducted to assess the relative occurrence and type of trauma (blunt vs penetrating), as well as differences in the management, duration of hospital stay, and need for orchiectomy between these 2 types of injury.

Results: There were 102 patients included in this study, with an average age of 39.5 years (18.7-77.2 years). Fifty-six patients had blunt scrotal trauma, and 46 had penetrating scrotal injury. There was not a statistically significant difference in the percentages of blunt versus penetrating trauma (P < = 0.3729). Patients with penetrating trauma were more likely to be inpatient than those with blunt trauma (69.6% vs 42.9%; P < = 0.013; 95% CI, 0.062-0.473). A total of 61 patients were treated conservatively (44 and 17 patients in the blunt and penetrating trauma groups, respectively). Overall, 41 patients required surgical intervention: 12 who had blunt trauma and 29 who suffered penetrating injury. Surgical treatment was more common for penetrating trauma than for blunt trauma (63.0% vs 21.4%; P <0.0001; 95% CI, 0.220-0.612). Eleven patients underwent orchiectomy - 4 from the blunt trauma group and 7 from the penetrating trauma group; the rate of orchiectomy was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: In this study, blunt scrotal trauma was slightly more common than penetrating injury, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Blunt scrotal trauma was associated with a higher rate of conservative treatment. Further study is needed to better understand the impact of scrotal trauma on future fertility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STRN-ALK Fusion in Advanced Salivary Gland Carcinoma With Response to Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition: Case Report and Literature Review. Community Agency Preferences for and Perceptions of Disseminating and Implementing a Continence Promotion Program. Delta-8 Tetrahydrocannabinol in the Emergency Department: A Case Series. Driving in Cars with Viral Transport Medium. Experience as IMGs Applying for US Clinical Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1