[干预措施促进健康学生自我保健能力的有效发展:范围研究]。

Cynthia Rojas-Muñoz, Daniel Lavín-Maggi, Lili Moraga Uribe, Klaus Puschel Illanes
{"title":"[干预措施促进健康学生自我保健能力的有效发展:范围研究]。","authors":"Cynthia Rojas-Muñoz, Daniel Lavín-Maggi, Lili Moraga Uribe, Klaus Puschel Illanes","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872023001101513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-care is a central element in the training of health students. The lack of effective strategies to develop it is associated with a 50% prevalence of burnout in this population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Identify and analyze effective strategies for self-care assessment and intervention in health students.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We developed a systematized scoping review using standardized methods to assess quality using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used for the thematic analysis. Four sources of information were explored including Pubmed, Google Scholar, Epistemónikos and Lilacs as well as gray literature. Two independent reviewers reviewed each publication and one expert defined controversies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1682 articles were identified, of which 33 were selected. The average quality of the reviewed articles was 13 points [6-14]. The thematic analysis identified two groups. First, self-care assessment studies (N = 12) highlighting the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II); and second effective intervention study highlighting four strategies: mindfulness (N = 14); group interventions (N = 8); mentoring (N = 2); and curricular interventions (N = 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are a variety of effective strategies to assess and promote self-care in health students. The studies we found stand out for being of good quality and applicable to the different study plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"151 11","pages":"1513-1525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Intervention fo Effective Development od Self-Care in Heralth Students: a Scoping Review].\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Rojas-Muñoz, Daniel Lavín-Maggi, Lili Moraga Uribe, Klaus Puschel Illanes\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872023001101513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-care is a central element in the training of health students. The lack of effective strategies to develop it is associated with a 50% prevalence of burnout in this population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Identify and analyze effective strategies for self-care assessment and intervention in health students.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We developed a systematized scoping review using standardized methods to assess quality using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used for the thematic analysis. Four sources of information were explored including Pubmed, Google Scholar, Epistemónikos and Lilacs as well as gray literature. Two independent reviewers reviewed each publication and one expert defined controversies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1682 articles were identified, of which 33 were selected. The average quality of the reviewed articles was 13 points [6-14]. The thematic analysis identified two groups. First, self-care assessment studies (N = 12) highlighting the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II); and second effective intervention study highlighting four strategies: mindfulness (N = 14); group interventions (N = 8); mentoring (N = 2); and curricular interventions (N = 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are a variety of effective strategies to assess and promote self-care in health students. The studies we found stand out for being of good quality and applicable to the different study plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"151 11\",\"pages\":\"1513-1525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872023001101513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872023001101513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自我保健是医学生培训的核心要素。目的:确定并分析对医学生进行自我保健评估和干预的有效策略:我们使用叙事性综述文章评估量表的标准化方法进行了系统化的范围界定综述质量评估。专题分析中使用了批判性评价技能计划。我们探索了四个信息来源,包括 Pubmed、Google Scholar、Epistemónikos 和 Lilacs 以及灰色文献。两名独立审稿人对每篇出版物进行了审阅,一名专家对争议进行了界定:结果:共发现了 1682 篇文章,其中 33 篇被选中。审阅文章的平均质量为 13 分[6-14]。专题分析确定了两组研究。第一组是自我保健评估研究(12 篇),重点是世界卫生组织生活质量量表(WHOQOL-BREF)和健康促进生活方式档案 II(HPLP-II);第二组是有效干预研究,重点是四种策略:正念(14 篇)、小组干预(8 篇)、指导(2 篇)和课程干预(4 篇):有多种有效策略可用于评估和促进医学生的自我保健。我们发现,这些研究的质量很高,而且适用于不同的研究计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Intervention fo Effective Development od Self-Care in Heralth Students: a Scoping Review].

Background: Self-care is a central element in the training of health students. The lack of effective strategies to develop it is associated with a 50% prevalence of burnout in this population.

Aim: Identify and analyze effective strategies for self-care assessment and intervention in health students.

Methodology: We developed a systematized scoping review using standardized methods to assess quality using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used for the thematic analysis. Four sources of information were explored including Pubmed, Google Scholar, Epistemónikos and Lilacs as well as gray literature. Two independent reviewers reviewed each publication and one expert defined controversies.

Results: A total of 1682 articles were identified, of which 33 were selected. The average quality of the reviewed articles was 13 points [6-14]. The thematic analysis identified two groups. First, self-care assessment studies (N = 12) highlighting the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II); and second effective intervention study highlighting four strategies: mindfulness (N = 14); group interventions (N = 8); mentoring (N = 2); and curricular interventions (N = 4).

Conclusion: There are a variety of effective strategies to assess and promote self-care in health students. The studies we found stand out for being of good quality and applicable to the different study plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Assessment of diagnostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry immunophenotyping and cytology in B cell non- Hodgkin lymphoma in a public chilean hospital]. [Characteristics of Depressed Individuals with Hypertension and/ or Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Health Care in Santiago de Chile]. [Decision-Making by Hospital Teams Regarding Access and Use of Life-Support Technology and End-of-Life Processes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Narrative Review]. [Decline in Renal Function with Age in Chile: Gender Differences and the Impact of Comorbidities]. [Encrusted Pyelitis Secondary to Corynebacterium urealyticum Infection: A Rare and Serious Complication].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1