印度尼西亚东加里曼丹煤矿开采后地区和非开采地区的Macaranga tanarius的急性毒性、次生代谢物和抗氧化活性。

Narra J Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.52225/narra.v4i2.791
Ika Fikriah, Muhammad A Masruhin, Swandari Paramita, Eva Marliana, Aman S Panggabean, Sjarif Ismail, Irawan W Kusuma, Yong-Ung Kim, Soo-Ya Kim
{"title":"印度尼西亚东加里曼丹煤矿开采后地区和非开采地区的Macaranga tanarius的急性毒性、次生代谢物和抗氧化活性。","authors":"Ika Fikriah, Muhammad A Masruhin, Swandari Paramita, Eva Marliana, Aman S Panggabean, Sjarif Ismail, Irawan W Kusuma, Yong-Ung Kim, Soo-Ya Kim","doi":"10.52225/narra.v4i2.791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coal plays a crucial role in Indonesia's foreign exchange and East Kalimantan's revenue sharing, yet its environmental impacts, including soil acidification, raises concerns. Reclamation measures involve revegetation with pioneer plants such as <i>Macaranga sp</i>., known for their medicinal properties. However, the pharmacological properties of these plants are influenced by secondary metabolites, which depend on soil parameters such as pH and nutrient levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute toxicity, secondary metabolites, and antioxidant activities of <i>Macaranga tanarius</i> leaf extracts from post-coal mining area (MTPCMA) and non-mining area (MTNMA) alongside soil parameters. Acute toxicity of <i>M. tanarius</i> leaf extracts and soils were assessed using the brine shrimp lethality test (BSLT). Phytochemical screening was done using thin-layer chromatography (TLC), determining total phenolic (TPC) and flavonoid content (TFC). The DPPH radical scavenging assay was used to assess the antioxidant activity. A comparative analysis between MTPCMA and MTNMA was conducted using Student t-test. The data showed no significant difference in toxicity between MTPCMA and MTNMA leaf extracts (LC50 of 100-1000 µg/mL) (<i>p</i>=0.062), and soils from both areas were non-toxic (LC50 of >1000 µg/mL). Although heavy metal concentrations were higher in PCMA than in NMA soil (<i>p</i><0.001), secondary metabolite compounds and TFC in both extracts were not significantly different (<i>p</i>=0.076). Both extracts contained flavonoids and polyphenols with antioxidant activity and terpenoids without antioxidant activities. The DPPH radical scavenging test suggested insignificant antioxidant activity between MTPCMA and MTNMA extracts (<i>p</i>=0.237). In conclusion, non-toxic soils in post-mining land and insignificant differences between MTPCMA and MTNMA extracts suggest good soil nutrient availability, highlighting the success of land recovery after 10 years of revegetation with <i>M. tanarius</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":517416,"journal":{"name":"Narra J","volume":"4 2","pages":"e791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute toxicity, secondary metabolites, and antioxidant activity of <i>Macaranga tanarius</i> from post-coal mining and non-mining areas in East Kalimantan, Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Ika Fikriah, Muhammad A Masruhin, Swandari Paramita, Eva Marliana, Aman S Panggabean, Sjarif Ismail, Irawan W Kusuma, Yong-Ung Kim, Soo-Ya Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.52225/narra.v4i2.791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coal plays a crucial role in Indonesia's foreign exchange and East Kalimantan's revenue sharing, yet its environmental impacts, including soil acidification, raises concerns. Reclamation measures involve revegetation with pioneer plants such as <i>Macaranga sp</i>., known for their medicinal properties. However, the pharmacological properties of these plants are influenced by secondary metabolites, which depend on soil parameters such as pH and nutrient levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute toxicity, secondary metabolites, and antioxidant activities of <i>Macaranga tanarius</i> leaf extracts from post-coal mining area (MTPCMA) and non-mining area (MTNMA) alongside soil parameters. Acute toxicity of <i>M. tanarius</i> leaf extracts and soils were assessed using the brine shrimp lethality test (BSLT). Phytochemical screening was done using thin-layer chromatography (TLC), determining total phenolic (TPC) and flavonoid content (TFC). The DPPH radical scavenging assay was used to assess the antioxidant activity. A comparative analysis between MTPCMA and MTNMA was conducted using Student t-test. The data showed no significant difference in toxicity between MTPCMA and MTNMA leaf extracts (LC50 of 100-1000 µg/mL) (<i>p</i>=0.062), and soils from both areas were non-toxic (LC50 of >1000 µg/mL). Although heavy metal concentrations were higher in PCMA than in NMA soil (<i>p</i><0.001), secondary metabolite compounds and TFC in both extracts were not significantly different (<i>p</i>=0.076). Both extracts contained flavonoids and polyphenols with antioxidant activity and terpenoids without antioxidant activities. The DPPH radical scavenging test suggested insignificant antioxidant activity between MTPCMA and MTNMA extracts (<i>p</i>=0.237). In conclusion, non-toxic soils in post-mining land and insignificant differences between MTPCMA and MTNMA extracts suggest good soil nutrient availability, highlighting the success of land recovery after 10 years of revegetation with <i>M. tanarius</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":517416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narra J\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"e791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391987/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narra J\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i2.791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narra J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v4i2.791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

煤炭在印尼的外汇和东加里曼丹的收入分配中发挥着至关重要的作用,但其对环境的影响,包括土壤酸化,引起了人们的关注。复垦措施包括利用马卡兰加属植物等先锋植物重新植被,这些植物因其药用特性而闻名。然而,这些植物的药理特性受到次生代谢物的影响,而次生代谢物又取决于土壤的 pH 值和养分水平等参数。本研究的目的是评估煤炭开采后地区(MTPCMA)和非开采地区(MTNMA)Macaranga tanarius 叶提取物的急性毒性、次生代谢物和抗氧化活性以及土壤参数。采用盐水虾致死试验(BSLT)评估了马钱子叶提取物和土壤的急性毒性。植物化学筛选采用薄层色谱法(TLC),测定总酚(TPC)和黄酮类化合物(TFC)的含量。DPPH 自由基清除试验用于评估抗氧化活性。采用学生 t 检验法对 MTPCMA 和 MTNMA 进行了比较分析。数据显示,MTPCMA 和 MTNMA 叶提取物的毒性(LC50 为 100-1000 µg/mL)无明显差异(p=0.062),两个地区的土壤均无毒性(LC50 >1000 µg/mL)。尽管 PCMA 土壤中的重金属浓度高于 NMA 土壤(pp=0.076)。两种提取物都含有具有抗氧化活性的类黄酮和多酚,以及不具有抗氧化活性的萜类化合物。DPPH 自由基清除试验表明,MTPCMA 和 MTNMA 提取物的抗氧化活性不显著(p=0.237)。总之,采矿后土壤无毒,MTPCMA 和 MTNMA 提取物之间的差异不显著,表明土壤养分可用性良好,突出表明经过 10 年重新植被 M. tanarius 后,土地恢复取得了成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute toxicity, secondary metabolites, and antioxidant activity of Macaranga tanarius from post-coal mining and non-mining areas in East Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Coal plays a crucial role in Indonesia's foreign exchange and East Kalimantan's revenue sharing, yet its environmental impacts, including soil acidification, raises concerns. Reclamation measures involve revegetation with pioneer plants such as Macaranga sp., known for their medicinal properties. However, the pharmacological properties of these plants are influenced by secondary metabolites, which depend on soil parameters such as pH and nutrient levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute toxicity, secondary metabolites, and antioxidant activities of Macaranga tanarius leaf extracts from post-coal mining area (MTPCMA) and non-mining area (MTNMA) alongside soil parameters. Acute toxicity of M. tanarius leaf extracts and soils were assessed using the brine shrimp lethality test (BSLT). Phytochemical screening was done using thin-layer chromatography (TLC), determining total phenolic (TPC) and flavonoid content (TFC). The DPPH radical scavenging assay was used to assess the antioxidant activity. A comparative analysis between MTPCMA and MTNMA was conducted using Student t-test. The data showed no significant difference in toxicity between MTPCMA and MTNMA leaf extracts (LC50 of 100-1000 µg/mL) (p=0.062), and soils from both areas were non-toxic (LC50 of >1000 µg/mL). Although heavy metal concentrations were higher in PCMA than in NMA soil (p<0.001), secondary metabolite compounds and TFC in both extracts were not significantly different (p=0.076). Both extracts contained flavonoids and polyphenols with antioxidant activity and terpenoids without antioxidant activities. The DPPH radical scavenging test suggested insignificant antioxidant activity between MTPCMA and MTNMA extracts (p=0.237). In conclusion, non-toxic soils in post-mining land and insignificant differences between MTPCMA and MTNMA extracts suggest good soil nutrient availability, highlighting the success of land recovery after 10 years of revegetation with M. tanarius.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of mortality in relationship between clinical and laboratory characteristics with the outcomes of children with diphtheria: A cross-sectional study at a national hospital of Sumatra region in 2020–2023 Determinants of COVID-19 severity and mortality in children: A retrospective and multicenter cohort study in Medan, Indonesia Improving maternal health literacy among low-income pregnant women: A systematic review A fruit fly-based approach to unraveling enteropathy-causing pharmaceuticals. A potential treatment for erectile dysfunction: Effect of platelet-rich plasma administration on axon and collagen regeneration in cavernous nerve injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1