在全科诊疗中为患者提供有关血清素综合征的建议。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16240
Theo Boheimer, Harish Thampy
{"title":"在全科诊疗中为患者提供有关血清素综合征的建议。","authors":"Theo Boheimer,&nbsp;Harish Thampy","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We were very interested in the review of serotonin syndrome management by Chiew et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> It highlighted the importance of early symptom recognition in reducing severity progression.</p><p>Given that the majority of prescribing practices occur in primary care, we recently conducted an audit (April 2024) at a large General Practice in the United Kingdom. The audit aimed to determine whether the potential risk of serotonin syndrome was communicated to at-risk patients and, if so, the nature of the advice provided. We performed a search of the practice's electronic patient records to identify patients who were currently co-prescribed two or more medications known to increase the risk of serotonin syndrome. The medications of interest included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, triptans and opioids. A subsequent review of individual patient notes was conducted to identify any documentation pertaining to serotonin syndrome counselling.</p><p>From the total practice population of 15 328 patients, 148 individuals were identified through the search. Of these, only 36 patients (24%) had documented evidence of receiving specific safety netting advice regarding serotonin syndrome. Among these, 5 patients were informed solely of the risk of the condition, 18 were additionally warned about the potential signs and symptoms and 13 were advised on appropriate actions to take if they experienced these symptoms.</p><p>We acknowledge that this audit is limited by its reliance on clinical documentation, which may not fully capture all discussions that occurred during consultations. However, from a medico-legal perspective, the absence of documentation generally implies that the discussion did not take place. Therefore, this audit underscores the need to enhance medication counselling practices, particularly concerning higher risk drug combinations, to ensure that patients are adequately informed about the possible signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome and the importance of seeking urgent medical attention.</p><p>As a result of this audit, we recommend the implementation of educational interventions to raise clinician awareness of this complication. Additionally, integrating alerts into the patient record system may help remind clinicians of the key areas to discuss and document during consultations. A follow-up audit is planned to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16240","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advising patients on serotonin syndrome in General Practice\",\"authors\":\"Theo Boheimer,&nbsp;Harish Thampy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We were very interested in the review of serotonin syndrome management by Chiew et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> It highlighted the importance of early symptom recognition in reducing severity progression.</p><p>Given that the majority of prescribing practices occur in primary care, we recently conducted an audit (April 2024) at a large General Practice in the United Kingdom. The audit aimed to determine whether the potential risk of serotonin syndrome was communicated to at-risk patients and, if so, the nature of the advice provided. We performed a search of the practice's electronic patient records to identify patients who were currently co-prescribed two or more medications known to increase the risk of serotonin syndrome. The medications of interest included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, triptans and opioids. A subsequent review of individual patient notes was conducted to identify any documentation pertaining to serotonin syndrome counselling.</p><p>From the total practice population of 15 328 patients, 148 individuals were identified through the search. Of these, only 36 patients (24%) had documented evidence of receiving specific safety netting advice regarding serotonin syndrome. Among these, 5 patients were informed solely of the risk of the condition, 18 were additionally warned about the potential signs and symptoms and 13 were advised on appropriate actions to take if they experienced these symptoms.</p><p>We acknowledge that this audit is limited by its reliance on clinical documentation, which may not fully capture all discussions that occurred during consultations. However, from a medico-legal perspective, the absence of documentation generally implies that the discussion did not take place. Therefore, this audit underscores the need to enhance medication counselling practices, particularly concerning higher risk drug combinations, to ensure that patients are adequately informed about the possible signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome and the importance of seeking urgent medical attention.</p><p>As a result of this audit, we recommend the implementation of educational interventions to raise clinician awareness of this complication. Additionally, integrating alerts into the patient record system may help remind clinicians of the key areas to discuss and document during consultations. A follow-up audit is planned to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"90 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16240\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16240\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对 Chiew 等人撰写的血清素综合征管理综述1 非常感兴趣。该综述强调了早期症状识别对于降低严重程度进展的重要性。鉴于大多数处方实践发生在初级保健领域,我们最近在英国一家大型综合诊所进行了一次审计(2024 年 4 月)。审计的目的是确定是否向高危患者传达了血清素综合征的潜在风险,如果有,所提供建议的性质如何。我们对该诊所的电子病历进行了搜索,以确定哪些患者目前同时服用两种或两种以上已知会增加血清素综合征风险的药物。相关药物包括选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂、血清素能-去甲肾上腺素能再摄取抑制剂、曲普坦和阿片类药物。随后又对患者的个人病历进行了审查,以确定是否有任何与血清素综合征咨询有关的文件。在这些患者中,只有 36 名患者(24%)记录了接受有关血清素综合征的特定安全网建议的证据。其中,5 名患者仅被告知了该病症的风险,18 名患者被额外警告了潜在的体征和症状,13 名患者被告知了在出现这些症状时应采取的适当行动。我们承认,本次审核由于依赖于临床文件而受到限制,因为临床文件可能无法完全记录会诊期间发生的所有讨论。但是,从医学法律的角度来看,没有记录通常意味着没有进行讨论。因此,本次审核强调了加强用药咨询实践的必要性,尤其是涉及高风险药物组合时,以确保患者充分了解血清素综合征可能出现的体征和症状,以及寻求紧急医疗救助的重要性。此外,在病历系统中整合提醒功能也有助于提醒临床医生在会诊过程中需要讨论和记录的关键领域。我们计划进行一次后续审核,以评估这些干预措施的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advising patients on serotonin syndrome in General Practice

We were very interested in the review of serotonin syndrome management by Chiew et al.1 It highlighted the importance of early symptom recognition in reducing severity progression.

Given that the majority of prescribing practices occur in primary care, we recently conducted an audit (April 2024) at a large General Practice in the United Kingdom. The audit aimed to determine whether the potential risk of serotonin syndrome was communicated to at-risk patients and, if so, the nature of the advice provided. We performed a search of the practice's electronic patient records to identify patients who were currently co-prescribed two or more medications known to increase the risk of serotonin syndrome. The medications of interest included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, triptans and opioids. A subsequent review of individual patient notes was conducted to identify any documentation pertaining to serotonin syndrome counselling.

From the total practice population of 15 328 patients, 148 individuals were identified through the search. Of these, only 36 patients (24%) had documented evidence of receiving specific safety netting advice regarding serotonin syndrome. Among these, 5 patients were informed solely of the risk of the condition, 18 were additionally warned about the potential signs and symptoms and 13 were advised on appropriate actions to take if they experienced these symptoms.

We acknowledge that this audit is limited by its reliance on clinical documentation, which may not fully capture all discussions that occurred during consultations. However, from a medico-legal perspective, the absence of documentation generally implies that the discussion did not take place. Therefore, this audit underscores the need to enhance medication counselling practices, particularly concerning higher risk drug combinations, to ensure that patients are adequately informed about the possible signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome and the importance of seeking urgent medical attention.

As a result of this audit, we recommend the implementation of educational interventions to raise clinician awareness of this complication. Additionally, integrating alerts into the patient record system may help remind clinicians of the key areas to discuss and document during consultations. A follow-up audit is planned to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Clozapine and norclozapine pharmacokinetic interaction with pantoprazole. Population pharmacokinetics and dose-response relationships of mitoxantrone in children with acute myeloid leukaemia. Model-informed drug development to support nemolizumab clinical development in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Evaluation of cytochrome P450 (CYP) induction using RT-qPCR in exosomes isolated from plasma samples: Method development and qualification. Clinician's attitudes & perspective on chemical adherence testing in hypertension (CATCH): A qualitative interview study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1