治疗血液恶性肿瘤患者耐碳青霉烯类感染的最新进展。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1080/14787210.2024.2408746
Abdullah Tarık Aslan, Murat Akova
{"title":"治疗血液恶性肿瘤患者耐碳青霉烯类感染的最新进展。","authors":"Abdullah Tarık Aslan, Murat Akova","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2408746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with hematological malignancies (PHMs) are at increased risk for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) due to frequent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and prolonged hospital stays. These infections result in high mortality and morbidity rates along with delays in chemotherapy, longer hospitalizations, and increased health care costs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Treatment alternatives for CRO infections in PHMs.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The best available treatment option for KPC and OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime/avibactam. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam remain as the alternative options. They can also be used as salvage therapy in KPC-positive <i>Enterobacterales</i> infections resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, if <i>in vitro</i> susceptibility is shown. Treatment of metallo-β-lactamase producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam or aztreonam/avibactam seems to be the most reliable option for metallo-β-lactamase producers. As a first-line option for carbapenem-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> infections, ceftolozane/tazobactam is preferable and ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam constitute alternative regimens. Although sulbactam/durlobactam is the most reliable option against carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> infections, its utility as monotherapy and in PHMs is not yet known. Cefiderocol can be selected as a 'last-resort' option for CRO infections. New risk score models supported by artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to predict the exact risk of infections in previously colonized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent updates in treating carbapenem-resistant infections in patients with hematological malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Tarık Aslan, Murat Akova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14787210.2024.2408746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with hematological malignancies (PHMs) are at increased risk for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) due to frequent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and prolonged hospital stays. These infections result in high mortality and morbidity rates along with delays in chemotherapy, longer hospitalizations, and increased health care costs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Treatment alternatives for CRO infections in PHMs.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The best available treatment option for KPC and OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime/avibactam. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam remain as the alternative options. They can also be used as salvage therapy in KPC-positive <i>Enterobacterales</i> infections resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, if <i>in vitro</i> susceptibility is shown. Treatment of metallo-β-lactamase producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam or aztreonam/avibactam seems to be the most reliable option for metallo-β-lactamase producers. As a first-line option for carbapenem-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> infections, ceftolozane/tazobactam is preferable and ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam constitute alternative regimens. Although sulbactam/durlobactam is the most reliable option against carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> infections, its utility as monotherapy and in PHMs is not yet known. Cefiderocol can be selected as a 'last-resort' option for CRO infections. New risk score models supported by artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to predict the exact risk of infections in previously colonized patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2408746\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2408746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:血液恶性肿瘤(PHMs)患者由于频繁接触广谱抗生素和住院时间延长,感染耐碳青霉烯类病菌(CROs)的风险增加。这些感染导致死亡率和发病率居高不下,同时还会延误化疗、延长住院时间并增加医疗费用:PHM 中 CRO 感染的替代治疗方案:专家观点:针对 KPC 和 OXA-48 生产者的最佳治疗方案是头孢他啶/阿维菌素。亚胺培南/西司他丁/雷巴坦和美罗培南/伐硼内酰胺仍然是替代选择。在对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦耐药的 KPC 阳性肠杆菌感染中,如果体外试验显示对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦敏感,也可将它们用作挽救疗法。金属-β-内酰胺酶产生者的治疗需求尚未得到满足。头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦加阿曲南或阿曲南/阿维巴坦似乎是治疗金属-β-内酰胺酶产生者的最可靠选择。作为耐碳青霉烯类的铜绿假单胞菌感染的一线治疗方案,头孢洛氮烷/他唑巴坦是首选,头孢唑肟/阿维菌素和亚胺培南/西司他丁/雷巴坦是替代方案。虽然舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦是治疗耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌感染的最可靠方案,但其作为单一疗法和在 PHM 中的作用尚不清楚。头孢哌酮可作为 CRO 感染的 "最后选择"。在人工智能算法的支持下,新的风险评分模型可用于预测既往定植患者的确切感染风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recent updates in treating carbapenem-resistant infections in patients with hematological malignancies.

Introduction: Patients with hematological malignancies (PHMs) are at increased risk for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) due to frequent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and prolonged hospital stays. These infections result in high mortality and morbidity rates along with delays in chemotherapy, longer hospitalizations, and increased health care costs.

Areas covered: Treatment alternatives for CRO infections in PHMs.

Expert opinion: The best available treatment option for KPC and OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime/avibactam. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam remain as the alternative options. They can also be used as salvage therapy in KPC-positive Enterobacterales infections resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, if in vitro susceptibility is shown. Treatment of metallo-β-lactamase producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam or aztreonam/avibactam seems to be the most reliable option for metallo-β-lactamase producers. As a first-line option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, ceftolozane/tazobactam is preferable and ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam constitute alternative regimens. Although sulbactam/durlobactam is the most reliable option against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, its utility as monotherapy and in PHMs is not yet known. Cefiderocol can be selected as a 'last-resort' option for CRO infections. New risk score models supported by artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to predict the exact risk of infections in previously colonized patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
期刊最新文献
Could the next "disease X" be a pandemic of virus-induced encephalitis? What should our first medical response be? The opportunities and challenges of epigenetic approaches to manage herpes simplex infections. Potential activity of nanomaterials to combat SARS-CoV-2 and mucormycosis ‎coinfection‎. Clinical effectiveness of oral antivirals for non-hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients aged 18-60 years. Is self-medication with antibiotics among the public a global concern: a mixed-methods systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1