Sudharshan Achalu, Rani Berry, Abel Joseph, Meera Bhargava, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Albert J Bredenoord, Joy Chang, Evan Dellon, Gary Falk, Ikuo Hirano, Jennifer Horsley-Silva, David A Leiman, Kristle L Lynch, Kathryn Peterson, Afrin N Kamal
{"title":"食管专家为成人嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎患者制定初步问题提示清单:改良德尔菲研究。","authors":"Sudharshan Achalu, Rani Berry, Abel Joseph, Meera Bhargava, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Albert J Bredenoord, Joy Chang, Evan Dellon, Gary Falk, Ikuo Hirano, Jennifer Horsley-Silva, David A Leiman, Kristle L Lynch, Kathryn Peterson, Afrin N Kamal","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, an EoE-specific QPL has not been developed for EoE patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a preliminary QPL specific to adults with EoE by incorporating input from international esophageal experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen experts were invited to generate QPL content through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, CA) method consisting of 2 rounds of independent ratings. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts \"what general questions should patients ask when being seen for EoE?\" and \"what questions do I not hear patients asking but given my experience, I believe they should be asking?\" In round 2, experts rated each question on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses rated as \"essential\" or \"important\" (determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥ 4.0) were accepted for the EoE QPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Round 1 generated 100 questions. Questions were combined and modified to reduce redundancy, yielding 57 questions. After round 2, 51 questions (85%) were accepted for inclusion (median value ≥ 4.0) in the final QPL. Questions were then divided into 4 themes based on disease domains: (1) \"What is EoE?,\" (2) \"Treatment Options,\" (3) \"Follow-up Surveillance and Long-term Risks,\" and (4) \"Allergy and Genetic Testing.\" The largest number of questions covered was \"What is EoE?\" (16/51 or 31%). Questions with the highest agreement median (5.0) included examples such as \"what should I do if I get a food impaction?\" and \"what are the treatment options?\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first preliminary EoE QPL developed in the field of medicine. We hope implementation enhances effective patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions that experts prioritized. Future studies will aim to modify this communication tool by incorporating patient perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esophageal Expert Development of a Preliminary Question Prompt List for Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Modified Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sudharshan Achalu, Rani Berry, Abel Joseph, Meera Bhargava, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Albert J Bredenoord, Joy Chang, Evan Dellon, Gary Falk, Ikuo Hirano, Jennifer Horsley-Silva, David A Leiman, Kristle L Lynch, Kathryn Peterson, Afrin N Kamal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, an EoE-specific QPL has not been developed for EoE patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a preliminary QPL specific to adults with EoE by incorporating input from international esophageal experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen experts were invited to generate QPL content through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, CA) method consisting of 2 rounds of independent ratings. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts \\\"what general questions should patients ask when being seen for EoE?\\\" and \\\"what questions do I not hear patients asking but given my experience, I believe they should be asking?\\\" In round 2, experts rated each question on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses rated as \\\"essential\\\" or \\\"important\\\" (determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥ 4.0) were accepted for the EoE QPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Round 1 generated 100 questions. Questions were combined and modified to reduce redundancy, yielding 57 questions. After round 2, 51 questions (85%) were accepted for inclusion (median value ≥ 4.0) in the final QPL. Questions were then divided into 4 themes based on disease domains: (1) \\\"What is EoE?,\\\" (2) \\\"Treatment Options,\\\" (3) \\\"Follow-up Surveillance and Long-term Risks,\\\" and (4) \\\"Allergy and Genetic Testing.\\\" The largest number of questions covered was \\\"What is EoE?\\\" (16/51 or 31%). Questions with the highest agreement median (5.0) included examples such as \\\"what should I do if I get a food impaction?\\\" and \\\"what are the treatment options?\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first preliminary EoE QPL developed in the field of medicine. We hope implementation enhances effective patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions that experts prioritized. Future studies will aim to modify this communication tool by incorporating patient perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Esophageal Expert Development of a Preliminary Question Prompt List for Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Modified Delphi Study.
Background: Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, an EoE-specific QPL has not been developed for EoE patients.
Aim: To develop a preliminary QPL specific to adults with EoE by incorporating input from international esophageal experts.
Methods: Sixteen experts were invited to generate QPL content through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, CA) method consisting of 2 rounds of independent ratings. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts "what general questions should patients ask when being seen for EoE?" and "what questions do I not hear patients asking but given my experience, I believe they should be asking?" In round 2, experts rated each question on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses rated as "essential" or "important" (determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥ 4.0) were accepted for the EoE QPL.
Results: Ten esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Round 1 generated 100 questions. Questions were combined and modified to reduce redundancy, yielding 57 questions. After round 2, 51 questions (85%) were accepted for inclusion (median value ≥ 4.0) in the final QPL. Questions were then divided into 4 themes based on disease domains: (1) "What is EoE?," (2) "Treatment Options," (3) "Follow-up Surveillance and Long-term Risks," and (4) "Allergy and Genetic Testing." The largest number of questions covered was "What is EoE?" (16/51 or 31%). Questions with the highest agreement median (5.0) included examples such as "what should I do if I get a food impaction?" and "what are the treatment options?"
Conclusion: This is the first preliminary EoE QPL developed in the field of medicine. We hope implementation enhances effective patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions that experts prioritized. Future studies will aim to modify this communication tool by incorporating patient perspectives.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.