食管专家为成人嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎患者制定初步问题提示清单:改良德尔菲研究。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066
Sudharshan Achalu, Rani Berry, Abel Joseph, Meera Bhargava, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Albert J Bredenoord, Joy Chang, Evan Dellon, Gary Falk, Ikuo Hirano, Jennifer Horsley-Silva, David A Leiman, Kristle L Lynch, Kathryn Peterson, Afrin N Kamal
{"title":"食管专家为成人嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎患者制定初步问题提示清单:改良德尔菲研究。","authors":"Sudharshan Achalu, Rani Berry, Abel Joseph, Meera Bhargava, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Albert J Bredenoord, Joy Chang, Evan Dellon, Gary Falk, Ikuo Hirano, Jennifer Horsley-Silva, David A Leiman, Kristle L Lynch, Kathryn Peterson, Afrin N Kamal","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, an EoE-specific QPL has not been developed for EoE patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a preliminary QPL specific to adults with EoE by incorporating input from international esophageal experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen experts were invited to generate QPL content through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, CA) method consisting of 2 rounds of independent ratings. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts \"what general questions should patients ask when being seen for EoE?\" and \"what questions do I not hear patients asking but given my experience, I believe they should be asking?\" In round 2, experts rated each question on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses rated as \"essential\" or \"important\" (determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥ 4.0) were accepted for the EoE QPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Round 1 generated 100 questions. Questions were combined and modified to reduce redundancy, yielding 57 questions. After round 2, 51 questions (85%) were accepted for inclusion (median value ≥ 4.0) in the final QPL. Questions were then divided into 4 themes based on disease domains: (1) \"What is EoE?,\" (2) \"Treatment Options,\" (3) \"Follow-up Surveillance and Long-term Risks,\" and (4) \"Allergy and Genetic Testing.\" The largest number of questions covered was \"What is EoE?\" (16/51 or 31%). Questions with the highest agreement median (5.0) included examples such as \"what should I do if I get a food impaction?\" and \"what are the treatment options?\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first preliminary EoE QPL developed in the field of medicine. We hope implementation enhances effective patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions that experts prioritized. Future studies will aim to modify this communication tool by incorporating patient perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esophageal Expert Development of a Preliminary Question Prompt List for Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Modified Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sudharshan Achalu, Rani Berry, Abel Joseph, Meera Bhargava, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Albert J Bredenoord, Joy Chang, Evan Dellon, Gary Falk, Ikuo Hirano, Jennifer Horsley-Silva, David A Leiman, Kristle L Lynch, Kathryn Peterson, Afrin N Kamal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, an EoE-specific QPL has not been developed for EoE patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a preliminary QPL specific to adults with EoE by incorporating input from international esophageal experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen experts were invited to generate QPL content through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, CA) method consisting of 2 rounds of independent ratings. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts \\\"what general questions should patients ask when being seen for EoE?\\\" and \\\"what questions do I not hear patients asking but given my experience, I believe they should be asking?\\\" In round 2, experts rated each question on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses rated as \\\"essential\\\" or \\\"important\\\" (determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥ 4.0) were accepted for the EoE QPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Round 1 generated 100 questions. Questions were combined and modified to reduce redundancy, yielding 57 questions. After round 2, 51 questions (85%) were accepted for inclusion (median value ≥ 4.0) in the final QPL. Questions were then divided into 4 themes based on disease domains: (1) \\\"What is EoE?,\\\" (2) \\\"Treatment Options,\\\" (3) \\\"Follow-up Surveillance and Long-term Risks,\\\" and (4) \\\"Allergy and Genetic Testing.\\\" The largest number of questions covered was \\\"What is EoE?\\\" (16/51 or 31%). Questions with the highest agreement median (5.0) included examples such as \\\"what should I do if I get a food impaction?\\\" and \\\"what are the treatment options?\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first preliminary EoE QPL developed in the field of medicine. We hope implementation enhances effective patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions that experts prioritized. Future studies will aim to modify this communication tool by incorporating patient perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:问题提示清单(QPL)是一套结构化的疾病特定问题集,旨在鼓励患者提问并加强患者与医生之间的交流。目的:通过采纳国际食管专家的意见,初步制定出针对成人食管炎患者的 QPL:邀请 16 位专家通过改良德尔菲法(RAND/加州大学洛杉矶分校)生成 QPL 内容,该方法包括两轮独立评分。在第 1 轮中,专家们针对 "患者在就诊时应问哪些一般性问题?"和 "我没有听到患者问哪些问题,但根据我的经验,我认为他们应该问哪些问题?"的提示提供了 5 个答案。在第二轮中,专家们对每个问题进行了 5 点李克特量表评分,被评为 "必要 "或 "重要"(由先验中值≥ 4.0 的阈值决定)的回答将被纳入 EoE QPL:10 位食管专家参加了两轮调查。第一轮产生了 100 个问题。为减少冗余,对问题进行了合并和修改,最终产生了 57 个问题。第 2 轮后,51 个问题(85%)被纳入最终 QPL(中位值≥ 4.0)。然后,根据疾病领域将问题分为 4 个主题:(1) "什么是咽喉炎?",(2) "治疗方案",(3) "随访监测和长期风险",以及 (4) "过敏和基因检测"。涉及最多的问题是 "什么是咽喉炎?"(16/51 或 31%)。同意中值(5.0)最高的问题包括 "如果食物嵌塞,我该怎么办?"和 "有哪些治疗方案?"等例子:这是在医学领域开发的首个初步 EoE QPL。我们希望通过鼓励患者提出专家优先考虑的相关问题,加强医患之间的有效沟通。未来的研究将通过纳入患者的观点来改进这一沟通工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Esophageal Expert Development of a Preliminary Question Prompt List for Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Modified Delphi Study.

Background: Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, an EoE-specific QPL has not been developed for EoE patients.

Aim: To develop a preliminary QPL specific to adults with EoE by incorporating input from international esophageal experts.

Methods: Sixteen experts were invited to generate QPL content through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, CA) method consisting of 2 rounds of independent ratings. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts "what general questions should patients ask when being seen for EoE?" and "what questions do I not hear patients asking but given my experience, I believe they should be asking?" In round 2, experts rated each question on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses rated as "essential" or "important" (determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥ 4.0) were accepted for the EoE QPL.

Results: Ten esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Round 1 generated 100 questions. Questions were combined and modified to reduce redundancy, yielding 57 questions. After round 2, 51 questions (85%) were accepted for inclusion (median value ≥ 4.0) in the final QPL. Questions were then divided into 4 themes based on disease domains: (1) "What is EoE?," (2) "Treatment Options," (3) "Follow-up Surveillance and Long-term Risks," and (4) "Allergy and Genetic Testing." The largest number of questions covered was "What is EoE?" (16/51 or 31%). Questions with the highest agreement median (5.0) included examples such as "what should I do if I get a food impaction?" and "what are the treatment options?"

Conclusion: This is the first preliminary EoE QPL developed in the field of medicine. We hope implementation enhances effective patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions that experts prioritized. Future studies will aim to modify this communication tool by incorporating patient perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Impact of High-dose Esomeprazole-amoxicillin Dual Therapy as Rescue Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis. Prevalence and Pathophysiology of Loose Stools and Their Impact on Clinical Severity and Quality of Life in Women With Fecal Incontinence. Brain Fog in Gastrointestinal Disorders: Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, Gastroparesis, Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Strategies, Technologies, and Tips for Successful Cecal Intubation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1