全球电休克疗法核磁共振成像研究合作组织的电休克疗法与认知能力。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.013
{"title":"全球电休克疗法核磁共振成像研究合作组织的电休克疗法与认知能力。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Global ECT MRI Research Collaboration (GEMRIC) has collected clinical and neuroimaging data of patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) from around the world. Results to date have focused on neuroimaging correlates of antidepressant response. GEMRIC sites have also collected longitudinal cognitive data. Here, we summarize the existing GEMRIC cognitive data and provide recommendations for prospective data collection for future ECT-imaging investigations. We describe the criteria for selection of cognitive measures for mega-analyses: Trail Making Test Parts A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B), verbal fluency category (VFC), verbal fluency letter (VFL), and percent retention from verbal learning and memory tests. We performed longitudinal data analysis focused on the pre-/post-ECT assessments with healthy comparison (HC) subjects at similar timepoints and assessed associations between demographic and ECT parameters with cognitive changes. The study found an interaction between electrode placement and treatment number for VFC (F(1,107) = 4.14, p = 0.04). Higher treatment was associated with decreased VFC performance with right unilateral electrode placement. Percent retention showed a main effect for group, with post-hoc analysis indicating decreased cognitive performance among the HC group. However, there were no significant effects of group or group interactions observed for TMT-A, TMT-B, or VFL. We assessed the current GEMRIC cognitive data and acknowledge the limitations associated with this data set including the limited number of neuropsychological domains assessed. Aside from the VFC and treatment number relationship, we did not observe ECT-mediated neurocognitive effects in this investigation. We provide prospective cognitive recommendations for future ECT-imaging investigations focused on strong psychometrics and minimal burden to subjects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624005351/pdfft?md5=f8b92dbe10c95fb9fe0d22f4735e8597&pid=1-s2.0-S0022395624005351-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroconvulsive therapy and cognitive performance from the Global ECT MRI Research Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Global ECT MRI Research Collaboration (GEMRIC) has collected clinical and neuroimaging data of patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) from around the world. Results to date have focused on neuroimaging correlates of antidepressant response. GEMRIC sites have also collected longitudinal cognitive data. Here, we summarize the existing GEMRIC cognitive data and provide recommendations for prospective data collection for future ECT-imaging investigations. We describe the criteria for selection of cognitive measures for mega-analyses: Trail Making Test Parts A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B), verbal fluency category (VFC), verbal fluency letter (VFL), and percent retention from verbal learning and memory tests. We performed longitudinal data analysis focused on the pre-/post-ECT assessments with healthy comparison (HC) subjects at similar timepoints and assessed associations between demographic and ECT parameters with cognitive changes. The study found an interaction between electrode placement and treatment number for VFC (F(1,107) = 4.14, p = 0.04). Higher treatment was associated with decreased VFC performance with right unilateral electrode placement. Percent retention showed a main effect for group, with post-hoc analysis indicating decreased cognitive performance among the HC group. However, there were no significant effects of group or group interactions observed for TMT-A, TMT-B, or VFL. We assessed the current GEMRIC cognitive data and acknowledge the limitations associated with this data set including the limited number of neuropsychological domains assessed. Aside from the VFC and treatment number relationship, we did not observe ECT-mediated neurocognitive effects in this investigation. We provide prospective cognitive recommendations for future ECT-imaging investigations focused on strong psychometrics and minimal burden to subjects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624005351/pdfft?md5=f8b92dbe10c95fb9fe0d22f4735e8597&pid=1-s2.0-S0022395624005351-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624005351\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624005351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球电休克磁共振成像研究合作组织(GEMRIC)收集了世界各地接受电休克疗法(ECT)治疗的患者的临床和神经成像数据。迄今为止,研究结果主要集中在抗抑郁反应的神经影像学相关性方面。GEMRIC 研究机构还收集了纵向认知数据。在此,我们总结了现有的 GEMRIC 认知数据,并为未来的 ECT 影像调查提供了前瞻性数据收集建议。我们介绍了为大型分析选择认知测量指标的标准:我们介绍了巨型分析认知指标的选择标准:踪迹创建测试 A 部分(TMT-A)和 B 部分(TMT-B)、言语流畅度类别(VFC)、言语流畅度字母(VFL)以及言语学习和记忆测试的保留百分比。我们进行了纵向数据分析,重点是在相似的时间点对健康对比(HC)受试者进行ECT前后评估,并评估人口统计学参数和ECT参数与认知变化之间的关联。研究发现,电极位置和治疗次数对 VFC 有交互作用(F(1,107) = 4.14, p = 0.04)。右侧单侧电极放置时,治疗次数越多,VFC表现越差。保留百分比显示了组别的主效应,事后分析表明,HC 组的认知能力下降。然而,在 TMT-A、TMT-B 或 VFL 方面,没有观察到明显的组间效应或组间交互作用。我们评估了当前的 GEMRIC 认知数据,并承认该数据集存在局限性,包括评估的神经心理学领域数量有限。除了 VFC 与治疗次数的关系外,我们在这项调查中没有观察到 ECT 所介导的神经认知效应。我们为未来的 ECT 成像调查提供了前瞻性认知建议,这些建议侧重于强大的心理计量学和最小的受试者负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electroconvulsive therapy and cognitive performance from the Global ECT MRI Research Collaboration
The Global ECT MRI Research Collaboration (GEMRIC) has collected clinical and neuroimaging data of patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) from around the world. Results to date have focused on neuroimaging correlates of antidepressant response. GEMRIC sites have also collected longitudinal cognitive data. Here, we summarize the existing GEMRIC cognitive data and provide recommendations for prospective data collection for future ECT-imaging investigations. We describe the criteria for selection of cognitive measures for mega-analyses: Trail Making Test Parts A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B), verbal fluency category (VFC), verbal fluency letter (VFL), and percent retention from verbal learning and memory tests. We performed longitudinal data analysis focused on the pre-/post-ECT assessments with healthy comparison (HC) subjects at similar timepoints and assessed associations between demographic and ECT parameters with cognitive changes. The study found an interaction between electrode placement and treatment number for VFC (F(1,107) = 4.14, p = 0.04). Higher treatment was associated with decreased VFC performance with right unilateral electrode placement. Percent retention showed a main effect for group, with post-hoc analysis indicating decreased cognitive performance among the HC group. However, there were no significant effects of group or group interactions observed for TMT-A, TMT-B, or VFL. We assessed the current GEMRIC cognitive data and acknowledge the limitations associated with this data set including the limited number of neuropsychological domains assessed. Aside from the VFC and treatment number relationship, we did not observe ECT-mediated neurocognitive effects in this investigation. We provide prospective cognitive recommendations for future ECT-imaging investigations focused on strong psychometrics and minimal burden to subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “The identification and measurement of postpartum anxiety in England: A Delphi survey” [J. Psychiatr. Res. 168 (2023) 381–391] Effect of combined Tai Chi and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for sleep disturbance in older adults: A randomized controlled trial Maternal gut-microbiota impacts the influence of intrauterine environmental stressors on the modulation of human cognitive development and behavior Exploring accelerated aging as a target of bipolar disorder treatment: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1