人工智能预测特发性正常压力脑积水患者的分流反应:系统性综述。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.087
Rafael Tiza Fernandes, Filipe Wolff Fernandes, Mrinmoy Kundu, Daniele S C Ramsay, Ahmed Salih, Srikar N Namireddy, Dragan Jankovic, Darius Kalasauskas, Malte Ottenhausen, Andreas Kramer, Florian Ringel, Santhosh G Thavarajasingam
{"title":"人工智能预测特发性正常压力脑积水患者的分流反应:系统性综述。","authors":"Rafael Tiza Fernandes, Filipe Wolff Fernandes, Mrinmoy Kundu, Daniele S C Ramsay, Ahmed Salih, Srikar N Namireddy, Dragan Jankovic, Darius Kalasauskas, Malte Ottenhausen, Andreas Kramer, Florian Ringel, Santhosh G Thavarajasingam","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a reversible cause of dementia, typically treated with shunt surgery, although outcomes vary. Artificial intelligence (AI) advancements could improve predictions of shunt response (SR) by analyzing extensive data sets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review to assess AI's effectiveness in predicting SR in iNPH. Studies using AI or machine learning (ML) algorithms for SR prediction were identified through searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to September 2023, adhering to Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 3541 studies identified, 33 were assessed for eligibility, and 8 involving 479 patients were included. Study sample sizes varied from 28 to 132 patients. Common data inputs included imaging/radiomics (62.5%) and demographics (37.5%), with Support Vector Machine being the most frequently used ML algorithm (87.5%). Two studies compared multiple algorithms. Only four studies reported the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values, which ranged between 0.80 and 0.94. The results highlighted inconsistency in outcome measures, data heterogeneity, and potential biases in the models used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While AI shows promise for improving iNPH management, there is a need for standardized data and extensive validation of AI models to enhance their clinical utility. Future research should aim to develop robust and generalizable AI models for more effective diagnosis and management of iNPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Tiza Fernandes, Filipe Wolff Fernandes, Mrinmoy Kundu, Daniele S C Ramsay, Ahmed Salih, Srikar N Namireddy, Dragan Jankovic, Darius Kalasauskas, Malte Ottenhausen, Andreas Kramer, Florian Ringel, Santhosh G Thavarajasingam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a reversible cause of dementia, typically treated with shunt surgery, although outcomes vary. Artificial intelligence (AI) advancements could improve predictions of shunt response (SR) by analyzing extensive data sets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review to assess AI's effectiveness in predicting SR in iNPH. Studies using AI or machine learning (ML) algorithms for SR prediction were identified through searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to September 2023, adhering to Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 3541 studies identified, 33 were assessed for eligibility, and 8 involving 479 patients were included. Study sample sizes varied from 28 to 132 patients. Common data inputs included imaging/radiomics (62.5%) and demographics (37.5%), with Support Vector Machine being the most frequently used ML algorithm (87.5%). Two studies compared multiple algorithms. Only four studies reported the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values, which ranged between 0.80 and 0.94. The results highlighted inconsistency in outcome measures, data heterogeneity, and potential biases in the models used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While AI shows promise for improving iNPH management, there is a need for standardized data and extensive validation of AI models to enhance their clinical utility. Future research should aim to develop robust and generalizable AI models for more effective diagnosis and management of iNPH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.087\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)是导致痴呆的一种可逆性原因,通常采用分流手术治疗,但疗效各不相同。人工智能(AI)的进步可以通过分析大量数据集来改善对分流反应(SR)的预测:我们进行了一项系统性综述,以评估人工智能在预测 iNPH SR 方面的有效性。通过检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Web of Science(截止到 2023 年 9 月),我们发现了使用人工智能或机器学习(ML)算法预测 SR 的研究,这些研究遵循了无 Meta 分析综合报告指南:在已确定的 3541 项研究中,对 33 项进行了资格评估,纳入了 8 项研究,涉及 479 名患者。研究样本量从 28 到 132 例患者不等。常见的数据输入包括成像/放射组学(62.5%)和人口统计学(37.5%),支持向量机是最常用的 ML 算法(87.5%)。有两项研究比较了多种算法。只有四项研究报告了曲线下面积 (AUC) 值,介于 0.80 和 0.94 之间。研究结果凸显了结果测量的不一致性、数据的异质性以及所用模型的潜在偏差:虽然人工智能有望改善 iNPH 管理,但仍需要标准化数据和人工智能模型的广泛验证,以提高其临床实用性。未来的研究应致力于开发稳健且可推广的人工智能模型,以更有效地诊断和管理 iNPH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review.

Background: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a reversible cause of dementia, typically treated with shunt surgery, although outcomes vary. Artificial intelligence (AI) advancements could improve predictions of shunt response (SR) by analyzing extensive data sets.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review to assess AI's effectiveness in predicting SR in iNPH. Studies using AI or machine learning (ML) algorithms for SR prediction were identified through searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to September 2023, adhering to Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines.

Results: Out of 3541 studies identified, 33 were assessed for eligibility, and 8 involving 479 patients were included. Study sample sizes varied from 28 to 132 patients. Common data inputs included imaging/radiomics (62.5%) and demographics (37.5%), with Support Vector Machine being the most frequently used ML algorithm (87.5%). Two studies compared multiple algorithms. Only four studies reported the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values, which ranged between 0.80 and 0.94. The results highlighted inconsistency in outcome measures, data heterogeneity, and potential biases in the models used.

Conclusions: While AI shows promise for improving iNPH management, there is a need for standardized data and extensive validation of AI models to enhance their clinical utility. Future research should aim to develop robust and generalizable AI models for more effective diagnosis and management of iNPH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Shunt Response in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review. Plasma estrogen levels and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in women. Postural Change Assists Surgical Maneuverability During Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Macroadenoma. YouTube® as a Tool for Medical Education: Analyzing Content Quality and Reliability on Chiari Malformation. Evaluation of the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lamina osteotomy replantation assisted by ultrasonic bone scalpel in the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1