所使用的药房类型会影响服药依从性吗?新西兰奥特亚罗亚地区的一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Canadian Pharmacists Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-28 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1177/17151635241267025
James Nind, Carlo A Marra, Shane Scahill, Charlotte Siermans, Alesha Smith
{"title":"所使用的药房类型会影响服药依从性吗?新西兰奥特亚罗亚地区的一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"James Nind, Carlo A Marra, Shane Scahill, Charlotte Siermans, Alesha Smith","doi":"10.1177/17151635241267025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community pharmacies in New Zealand have varying ownership and operational structures. Unlike independent pharmacies, corporate and hybrid pharmacies do not charge prescription copayments.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research aimed to determine whether people receiving free prescriptions from corporate and hybrid pharmacies (via copayment waiver) have greater medication adherence than the users of independent pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide, retrospective, observational study linked 1 year of dispensing data (1/05/2022 to 30/04/2023) from the Pharmaceutical Collection to patient enrollment data using a National Health Index number to identify demographics of different pharmacy-type users. People were assigned to a particular type of pharmacy if they collected at least 70% of their prescriptions from there; if they did not meet this threshold, they were defined as mixed users. People were classified as adherent if dispensing data showed they collected their supply of medication to cover at least 80% of the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample captured 218,080 people taking at least 1 diabetes medication, with a total of 360,079 unique medications being included in the analysis. The majority, 156,893, used independent pharmacies. The type of pharmacy used was shown to be a significant predictor of adherence. Corporate and hybrid pharmacy users were 0.90 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) times as likely be adherent than the users of independent pharmacies. Mail order pharmacy users were the most likely to be adherent, whereas mixed pharmacy users were the least likely to be adherent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that prescription copayments provided by corporate and hybrid pharmacies are not the most significant barrier to medication adherence. Further research may identify more efficient ways of improving medication adherence than removing prescription copayments for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":46612,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal","volume":"157 5","pages":"261-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the type of pharmacy used influence medication adherence? A retrospective observational study in Aotearoa, New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"James Nind, Carlo A Marra, Shane Scahill, Charlotte Siermans, Alesha Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17151635241267025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community pharmacies in New Zealand have varying ownership and operational structures. Unlike independent pharmacies, corporate and hybrid pharmacies do not charge prescription copayments.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research aimed to determine whether people receiving free prescriptions from corporate and hybrid pharmacies (via copayment waiver) have greater medication adherence than the users of independent pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide, retrospective, observational study linked 1 year of dispensing data (1/05/2022 to 30/04/2023) from the Pharmaceutical Collection to patient enrollment data using a National Health Index number to identify demographics of different pharmacy-type users. People were assigned to a particular type of pharmacy if they collected at least 70% of their prescriptions from there; if they did not meet this threshold, they were defined as mixed users. People were classified as adherent if dispensing data showed they collected their supply of medication to cover at least 80% of the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample captured 218,080 people taking at least 1 diabetes medication, with a total of 360,079 unique medications being included in the analysis. The majority, 156,893, used independent pharmacies. The type of pharmacy used was shown to be a significant predictor of adherence. Corporate and hybrid pharmacy users were 0.90 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) times as likely be adherent than the users of independent pharmacies. Mail order pharmacy users were the most likely to be adherent, whereas mixed pharmacy users were the least likely to be adherent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that prescription copayments provided by corporate and hybrid pharmacies are not the most significant barrier to medication adherence. Further research may identify more efficient ways of improving medication adherence than removing prescription copayments for all.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Pharmacists Journal\",\"volume\":\"157 5\",\"pages\":\"261-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418264/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Pharmacists Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17151635241267025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17151635241267025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新西兰社区药房的所有权和运营结构各不相同。与独立药房不同,公司药房和混合药房不收取处方共付额:本研究旨在确定从企业药房和混合药房(通过免除共付额)获得免费处方的人是否比独立药房的用户更能坚持用药:这是一项全国范围内的回顾性观察研究,通过使用国民健康指数编号,将药品收集处一年的配药数据(2022 年 5 月 1 日至 2023 年 4 月 30 日)与患者注册数据联系起来,以确定不同药房类型用户的人口统计学特征。如果患者至少有 70% 的处方来自某类药房,则被归入该类药房;如果未达到该阈值,则被定义为混合用户。如果配药数据显示他们在研究期间至少有 80% 的时间在药房取药,则被归类为坚持用药者:抽样调查了 218,080 名至少服用一种糖尿病药物的患者,共有 360,079 种药物被纳入分析范围。大多数人(156893 人)使用独立药房。结果表明,所使用的药房类型对用药依从性有显著的预测作用。公司药房和混合药房用户坚持用药的可能性分别是独立药房用户的 0.90 倍(95% CI 0.88 至 0.93)和 0.93 倍(95% CI 0.90 至 0.96)。邮购药房用户最有可能坚持用药,而混合药房用户坚持用药的可能性最小:我们的研究结果表明,企业药房和混合药房提供的处方共付额并不是影响坚持用药的最大障碍。进一步的研究可能会找到比取消处方共付额更有效的方法来提高用药依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does the type of pharmacy used influence medication adherence? A retrospective observational study in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

Background: Community pharmacies in New Zealand have varying ownership and operational structures. Unlike independent pharmacies, corporate and hybrid pharmacies do not charge prescription copayments.

Objectives: This research aimed to determine whether people receiving free prescriptions from corporate and hybrid pharmacies (via copayment waiver) have greater medication adherence than the users of independent pharmacies.

Methods: A nationwide, retrospective, observational study linked 1 year of dispensing data (1/05/2022 to 30/04/2023) from the Pharmaceutical Collection to patient enrollment data using a National Health Index number to identify demographics of different pharmacy-type users. People were assigned to a particular type of pharmacy if they collected at least 70% of their prescriptions from there; if they did not meet this threshold, they were defined as mixed users. People were classified as adherent if dispensing data showed they collected their supply of medication to cover at least 80% of the study period.

Results: The sample captured 218,080 people taking at least 1 diabetes medication, with a total of 360,079 unique medications being included in the analysis. The majority, 156,893, used independent pharmacies. The type of pharmacy used was shown to be a significant predictor of adherence. Corporate and hybrid pharmacy users were 0.90 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) times as likely be adherent than the users of independent pharmacies. Mail order pharmacy users were the most likely to be adherent, whereas mixed pharmacy users were the least likely to be adherent.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that prescription copayments provided by corporate and hybrid pharmacies are not the most significant barrier to medication adherence. Further research may identify more efficient ways of improving medication adherence than removing prescription copayments for all.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Pharmacists Journal
Canadian Pharmacists Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
26.70%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Established in 1868, the Canadian Pharmacists Journal is the oldest continuously published periodical in Canada. Our mission is to enhance patient care through advancement of pharmacy practice, with continuing professional development, peer-reviewed research, and advocacy. Our vision is to become the foremost journal for pharmacy practice and research.
期刊最新文献
The role of Alberta pharmacists working in opioid use disorder and their potential to prescribe buprenorphine-naloxone: A qualitative study. Opportunities and challenges associated with the launch of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) in British Columbia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study to explore community pharmacists' perspectives. Lyme disease chemoprophylaxis prescribing before and after pharmacist prescriptive authority in Nova Scotia. Enabling pharmacist prescribing: Lessons learned in Nova Scotia using behaviour change theory. British Columbia community pharmacy during COVID-19: Describing the patient experience via Google reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1