Chandra Bhati, Danielle Kirkman, Mikael F Forsgren, Hiba Kamal, Hiba Khan, Sherry Boyett, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard, Jennifer Linge, Vaishali Patel, Samarth Patel, Susan Wolver, Mohammad S Siddiqui
{"title":"与匹配的非移植对照组相比,肝移植受者的代谢体表型更差","authors":"Chandra Bhati, Danielle Kirkman, Mikael F Forsgren, Hiba Kamal, Hiba Khan, Sherry Boyett, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard, Jennifer Linge, Vaishali Patel, Samarth Patel, Susan Wolver, Mohammad S Siddiqui","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Quantification of body compartments, particularly the interaction between adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, is emerging as novel a biomarker of metabolic health. The present study evaluated the impact of liver transplant (LT) on body compartments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Totally 66 adult LT recipients were enrolled in whom body compartments including visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT), muscle fat infiltration (MFI), fat-free muscle volume (FFMV), and liver fat (LF) were quantified via whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To provide non-LT comparison, each LT recipient was matched to at least 150 non-LT controls for same sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) from the UK Biobank registry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>LT recipients (<i>vs</i> matched non-LT controls) had significantly higher subcutaneous (13.82 ± 5.47 <i>vs</i> 12.10 ± 5.10 L, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and visceral fat (7.59 ± 3.75 <i>vs</i> 6.72 ± 3.06 L, <i>P</i> = 0.003) and lower LF (5.88 ± 7.14 <i>vs</i> 8.75 ± 6.50%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and muscle volume (11.69 ± 2.95 <i>vs</i> 12.12 ± 2.90 L, <i>P</i> = 0.027). In subgroup analysis, patients transplanted for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) cirrhosis (<i>vs</i> non-MASH cirrhosis) had higher ASAT, VAT, and MFI. A trend toward higher LF content was noted; however, this did not reach statistical significance (6.90 ± 7.35 <i>vs</i> 4.04 ± 6.23%, <i>P</i> = 0.189). Finally, compared with matched non-LT controls, patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis had higher ASAT and VAT; however, FFMV and MFI were similar.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using non-LT controls, the current study established the higher-than-expected adiposity burden among LT recipients, which is even higher among patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis. These findings provide data needed to design future studies developing radiomics-based risk-stratification strategies in LT recipients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"8 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liver transplant recipients have worse metabolic body phenotype compared with matched non-transplant controls\",\"authors\":\"Chandra Bhati, Danielle Kirkman, Mikael F Forsgren, Hiba Kamal, Hiba Khan, Sherry Boyett, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard, Jennifer Linge, Vaishali Patel, Samarth Patel, Susan Wolver, Mohammad S Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quantification of body compartments, particularly the interaction between adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, is emerging as novel a biomarker of metabolic health. The present study evaluated the impact of liver transplant (LT) on body compartments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Totally 66 adult LT recipients were enrolled in whom body compartments including visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT), muscle fat infiltration (MFI), fat-free muscle volume (FFMV), and liver fat (LF) were quantified via whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To provide non-LT comparison, each LT recipient was matched to at least 150 non-LT controls for same sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) from the UK Biobank registry.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>LT recipients (<i>vs</i> matched non-LT controls) had significantly higher subcutaneous (13.82 ± 5.47 <i>vs</i> 12.10 ± 5.10 L, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and visceral fat (7.59 ± 3.75 <i>vs</i> 6.72 ± 3.06 L, <i>P</i> = 0.003) and lower LF (5.88 ± 7.14 <i>vs</i> 8.75 ± 6.50%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and muscle volume (11.69 ± 2.95 <i>vs</i> 12.12 ± 2.90 L, <i>P</i> = 0.027). In subgroup analysis, patients transplanted for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) cirrhosis (<i>vs</i> non-MASH cirrhosis) had higher ASAT, VAT, and MFI. A trend toward higher LF content was noted; however, this did not reach statistical significance (6.90 ± 7.35 <i>vs</i> 4.04 ± 6.23%, <i>P</i> = 0.189). Finally, compared with matched non-LT controls, patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis had higher ASAT and VAT; however, FFMV and MFI were similar.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using non-LT controls, the current study established the higher-than-expected adiposity burden among LT recipients, which is even higher among patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis. These findings provide data needed to design future studies developing radiomics-based risk-stratification strategies in LT recipients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"8 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70024\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liver transplant recipients have worse metabolic body phenotype compared with matched non-transplant controls
Background and Aim
Quantification of body compartments, particularly the interaction between adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, is emerging as novel a biomarker of metabolic health. The present study evaluated the impact of liver transplant (LT) on body compartments.
Methods
Totally 66 adult LT recipients were enrolled in whom body compartments including visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT), muscle fat infiltration (MFI), fat-free muscle volume (FFMV), and liver fat (LF) were quantified via whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To provide non-LT comparison, each LT recipient was matched to at least 150 non-LT controls for same sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) from the UK Biobank registry.
Results
LT recipients (vs matched non-LT controls) had significantly higher subcutaneous (13.82 ± 5.47 vs 12.10 ± 5.10 L, P < 0.001) and visceral fat (7.59 ± 3.75 vs 6.72 ± 3.06 L, P = 0.003) and lower LF (5.88 ± 7.14 vs 8.75 ± 6.50%, P < 0.001) and muscle volume (11.69 ± 2.95 vs 12.12 ± 2.90 L, P = 0.027). In subgroup analysis, patients transplanted for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) cirrhosis (vs non-MASH cirrhosis) had higher ASAT, VAT, and MFI. A trend toward higher LF content was noted; however, this did not reach statistical significance (6.90 ± 7.35 vs 4.04 ± 6.23%, P = 0.189). Finally, compared with matched non-LT controls, patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis had higher ASAT and VAT; however, FFMV and MFI were similar.
Conclusion
Using non-LT controls, the current study established the higher-than-expected adiposity burden among LT recipients, which is even higher among patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis. These findings provide data needed to design future studies developing radiomics-based risk-stratification strategies in LT recipients.