全面评估原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症一石激起千层浪

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115978
{"title":"全面评估原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症一石激起千层浪","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a treatable cause of nephrolithiasis. However, PHPT is not consistently evaluated in nephrolithiasis patients. Symptoms of parathyroid disease were explored in relation to evaluation of PHPT in nephrolithiasis patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with nephrolithiasis on imaging between 2017 and 2021 were identified. Measurement of serum calcium levels after nephrolithiasis diagnosis was determined. Patients with hypercalcemia (<span><math><mrow><mo>≥</mo></mrow></math></span> 10.2 ​mg/dL) were identified. Characteristics associated with parathyroid hormone (PTH) evaluation and specialist referral were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2264 nephrolithiasis patients with calcium levels measured, 383 (17.1 ​%) had hypercalcemia. Of those, 107 (27.9 ​%) had PTH levels drawn. PTH was more often assessed in patients with higher median calcium levels, recurrent nephrolithiasis, depression, and osteopenia/osteoporosis. PTH was elevated (&gt;64 ​pg/mL) or non-suppressed (40–64 ​pg/mL) in 68 (63.6 ​%) patients. Of those, 31 (45.6 ​%) were referred to a parathyroid specialist. Referred patients had higher PTH and calcium levels than those without referral, and higher rates of osteopenia/osteoporosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PTH evaluation in hypercalcemic nephrolithiasis patients was low. The majority of patients evaluated had elevated or non-suppressed PTH levels, but only a fraction were referred to a specialist.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A thorough evaluation for primary hyperparathyroidism: More than a stone's throw away\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a treatable cause of nephrolithiasis. However, PHPT is not consistently evaluated in nephrolithiasis patients. Symptoms of parathyroid disease were explored in relation to evaluation of PHPT in nephrolithiasis patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with nephrolithiasis on imaging between 2017 and 2021 were identified. Measurement of serum calcium levels after nephrolithiasis diagnosis was determined. Patients with hypercalcemia (<span><math><mrow><mo>≥</mo></mrow></math></span> 10.2 ​mg/dL) were identified. Characteristics associated with parathyroid hormone (PTH) evaluation and specialist referral were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2264 nephrolithiasis patients with calcium levels measured, 383 (17.1 ​%) had hypercalcemia. Of those, 107 (27.9 ​%) had PTH levels drawn. PTH was more often assessed in patients with higher median calcium levels, recurrent nephrolithiasis, depression, and osteopenia/osteoporosis. PTH was elevated (&gt;64 ​pg/mL) or non-suppressed (40–64 ​pg/mL) in 68 (63.6 ​%) patients. Of those, 31 (45.6 ​%) were referred to a parathyroid specialist. Referred patients had higher PTH and calcium levels than those without referral, and higher rates of osteopenia/osteoporosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PTH evaluation in hypercalcemic nephrolithiasis patients was low. The majority of patients evaluated had elevated or non-suppressed PTH levels, but only a fraction were referred to a specialist.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005300\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症(PHPT)是肾结石的一种可治疗原因。然而,对肾结石患者的PHPT评估并不一致。研究人员探讨了甲状旁腺疾病的症状与肾炎患者 PHPT 评估的关系。方法确定了 2017 年至 2021 年期间通过影像学检查患有肾炎的患者。测定肾结石诊断后的血清钙水平。确定了高钙血症(≥ 10.2 mg/dL)患者。结果 在测量血钙水平的 2264 名肾结石患者中,383 人(17.1%)患有高钙血症。其中 107 人(27.9%)检测了 PTH 水平。中位钙水平较高、复发性肾结石、抑郁症和骨质疏松/骨质疏松症患者更常接受 PTH 评估。68例(63.6%)患者的PTH升高(64 pg/mL)或未受抑制(40-64 pg/mL)。其中31人(45.6%)被转诊至甲状旁腺专科医生。与未转诊的患者相比,转诊患者的PTH和血钙水平更高,骨质疏松症/骨质疏松症的发生率也更高。大多数接受评估的患者PTH水平升高或未受抑制,但只有一小部分患者被转诊至专科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A thorough evaluation for primary hyperparathyroidism: More than a stone's throw away

Background

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a treatable cause of nephrolithiasis. However, PHPT is not consistently evaluated in nephrolithiasis patients. Symptoms of parathyroid disease were explored in relation to evaluation of PHPT in nephrolithiasis patients.

Methods

Patients with nephrolithiasis on imaging between 2017 and 2021 were identified. Measurement of serum calcium levels after nephrolithiasis diagnosis was determined. Patients with hypercalcemia ( 10.2 ​mg/dL) were identified. Characteristics associated with parathyroid hormone (PTH) evaluation and specialist referral were assessed.

Results

Of 2264 nephrolithiasis patients with calcium levels measured, 383 (17.1 ​%) had hypercalcemia. Of those, 107 (27.9 ​%) had PTH levels drawn. PTH was more often assessed in patients with higher median calcium levels, recurrent nephrolithiasis, depression, and osteopenia/osteoporosis. PTH was elevated (>64 ​pg/mL) or non-suppressed (40–64 ​pg/mL) in 68 (63.6 ​%) patients. Of those, 31 (45.6 ​%) were referred to a parathyroid specialist. Referred patients had higher PTH and calcium levels than those without referral, and higher rates of osteopenia/osteoporosis.

Conclusions

PTH evaluation in hypercalcemic nephrolithiasis patients was low. The majority of patients evaluated had elevated or non-suppressed PTH levels, but only a fraction were referred to a specialist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of ERAS protocol adherence and postoperative outcomes after major colorectal surgery in a community hospital. National trends and costs of same day discharge in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colectomy. Variation in PTH levels and kinetics after parathyroidectomy Time is money: The return on investment of research in surgical training AJS virtual research mentor: Tips on writing an abstract for a conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1