通过在建筑立面上镶嵌几何图案实现高效采光和热性能:系统综述

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2024.101563
Mana Dastoum, Carmen Sanchez Guevara, Beatriz Arranz
{"title":"通过在建筑立面上镶嵌几何图案实现高效采光和热性能:系统综述","authors":"Mana Dastoum,&nbsp;Carmen Sanchez Guevara,&nbsp;Beatriz Arranz","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of sustainable architecture and construction, facade design plays a crucial role in regulating building energy consumption by controlling factors such as daylight and thermal comfort. Traditional approaches have evolved to incorporate geometric patterns like tessellations, which offer both aesthetic and functional benefits. However, understanding the intricate relationship between tessellation patterns and energy efficiency remains a complex task. Although numerous literature reviews exist on energy-efficient building facades, only a few have specifically addressed the geometric aspects of facade design and their impact on energy performance. This study conducts a systematic review of existing literature, employing the PRISMA framework to uncover the nuanced effects and potential limitations of tessellation patterns. Of the 611 papers identified in the initial search, a large number were excluded based on selection criteria and screening, leaving a total of 36 papers for review. Among these, 22 studies specifically focused on tessellated patterns. The review identifies significant gaps in the literature: 40 % of studies concentrated on static shading screens, while only 28 % and 23 % addressed static and dynamic double-skin facades, respectively. Research on dynamic shading screens remains largely unexplored. Daylight performance was the most studied energy indicator (73 %), while thermal performance accounted for only 18 % of the focus. Additionally, 62 % of the studies focused on hot-arid and semi-arid climates. These findings highlight the need for further research on dynamic shading screens, the integration of daylight and thermal performance, diverse climate contexts, sustainable materials, smart controls, and practical designs for real-world application. The significance of this study extends beyond academia to architects, urban planners, and policymakers involved in sustainable building design and construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101563"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient daylighting and thermal performance through tessellation of geometric patterns in building façade: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Mana Dastoum,&nbsp;Carmen Sanchez Guevara,&nbsp;Beatriz Arranz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the realm of sustainable architecture and construction, facade design plays a crucial role in regulating building energy consumption by controlling factors such as daylight and thermal comfort. Traditional approaches have evolved to incorporate geometric patterns like tessellations, which offer both aesthetic and functional benefits. However, understanding the intricate relationship between tessellation patterns and energy efficiency remains a complex task. Although numerous literature reviews exist on energy-efficient building facades, only a few have specifically addressed the geometric aspects of facade design and their impact on energy performance. This study conducts a systematic review of existing literature, employing the PRISMA framework to uncover the nuanced effects and potential limitations of tessellation patterns. Of the 611 papers identified in the initial search, a large number were excluded based on selection criteria and screening, leaving a total of 36 papers for review. Among these, 22 studies specifically focused on tessellated patterns. The review identifies significant gaps in the literature: 40 % of studies concentrated on static shading screens, while only 28 % and 23 % addressed static and dynamic double-skin facades, respectively. Research on dynamic shading screens remains largely unexplored. Daylight performance was the most studied energy indicator (73 %), while thermal performance accounted for only 18 % of the focus. Additionally, 62 % of the studies focused on hot-arid and semi-arid climates. These findings highlight the need for further research on dynamic shading screens, the integration of daylight and thermal performance, diverse climate contexts, sustainable materials, smart controls, and practical designs for real-world application. The significance of this study extends beyond academia to architects, urban planners, and policymakers involved in sustainable building design and construction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"83 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082624001893\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082624001893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在可持续建筑和施工领域,外立面设计通过控制日光和热舒适度等因素,在调节建筑能耗方面发挥着至关重要的作用。传统的设计方法已发展到采用几何图案(如棋盘格),这种图案具有美学和功能上的双重优势。然而,了解细分图案与能源效率之间的复杂关系仍然是一项复杂的任务。尽管有许多关于节能建筑外立面的文献综述,但只有少数文献专门讨论了外立面设计的几何方面及其对节能性能的影响。本研究采用 PRISMA 框架对现有文献进行了系统回顾,以揭示细分图案的细微影响和潜在限制。在最初搜索到的 611 篇论文中,根据选择标准和筛选结果,大量论文被排除在外,总共有 36 篇论文可供查阅。其中,有 22 项研究特别关注了镶嵌图案。综述发现了文献中的重大空白:40% 的研究集中在静态遮阳幕上,而只有 28% 和 23% 的研究分别涉及静态和动态双层幕墙。关于动态遮阳屏的研究在很大程度上仍处于空白状态。日光性能是研究最多的能源指标(73%),而热性能仅占研究重点的 18%。此外,62%的研究集中于炎热干旱和半干旱气候。这些发现突出表明,有必要进一步研究动态遮阳屏、日光与热性能的结合、不同的气候环境、可持续材料、智能控制以及实际应用中的实用设计。这项研究的意义不仅限于学术界,还包括建筑师、城市规划者以及参与可持续建筑设计和施工的政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient daylighting and thermal performance through tessellation of geometric patterns in building façade: A systematic review
In the realm of sustainable architecture and construction, facade design plays a crucial role in regulating building energy consumption by controlling factors such as daylight and thermal comfort. Traditional approaches have evolved to incorporate geometric patterns like tessellations, which offer both aesthetic and functional benefits. However, understanding the intricate relationship between tessellation patterns and energy efficiency remains a complex task. Although numerous literature reviews exist on energy-efficient building facades, only a few have specifically addressed the geometric aspects of facade design and their impact on energy performance. This study conducts a systematic review of existing literature, employing the PRISMA framework to uncover the nuanced effects and potential limitations of tessellation patterns. Of the 611 papers identified in the initial search, a large number were excluded based on selection criteria and screening, leaving a total of 36 papers for review. Among these, 22 studies specifically focused on tessellated patterns. The review identifies significant gaps in the literature: 40 % of studies concentrated on static shading screens, while only 28 % and 23 % addressed static and dynamic double-skin facades, respectively. Research on dynamic shading screens remains largely unexplored. Daylight performance was the most studied energy indicator (73 %), while thermal performance accounted for only 18 % of the focus. Additionally, 62 % of the studies focused on hot-arid and semi-arid climates. These findings highlight the need for further research on dynamic shading screens, the integration of daylight and thermal performance, diverse climate contexts, sustainable materials, smart controls, and practical designs for real-world application. The significance of this study extends beyond academia to architects, urban planners, and policymakers involved in sustainable building design and construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Economic Analysis of Bifacial Roof-top PV Systems Development of a comprehensive Rooftop Solar PV Index using DVF framework of Design Thinking Long-range energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions analysis using the LEAP Model: A case study of building ceramic industrial park Assessing greenhouse gas emissions and decarbonization potential of household biogas plant: Nepal's case study Spatial vulnerability of energy poverty among the households in Odisha
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1