{"title":"在自然语言处理模型的辅助下验证丹麦医院的神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症诊断编码","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Danish Health Care Registers rely on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-classification and stand as a widely utilized resource for health epidemiological research. Eating disorders are multifaceted syndromes where two distinctive diagnoses are defined, anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). However, the validity of the registered diagnoses remains to be verified. Manuel chart review is often the method for validation of diagnosis codes, but there is limited research on how natural language processing (NLP) models could enhance this process.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the accuracy of the clinical use of ICD-10 diagnosis codes F50.0, F50.1, F50.2, and F50.3 in the Danish Health Care Registers, using a manual chart review assisted by NLP.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>From a cohort of all individuals attending hospitals in Region of Southern Denmark with registered electronic health information, we extracted medical information from the electronic health journal on 100 individuals with each of the four diagnosis codes. After extraction, an NLP model with regular expression search patterns identified relevant text passages for manual chart review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 372 of the 400 diagnosis codes (93%) were correct. A diagnosis code for AN was correct in 90% of instances, 96% for atypical AN, 96% for BN and 90% for an atypical BN diagnosis code.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found that the accuracy of a diagnosis code F50.0, F50.1, F50.2, and F50.3 to be high. This confirms that the generally well-documented validity of the Danish health care registers also applies to the eating disorder diagnoses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of anorexia nervosa and Bulimia nervosa diagnosis coding in Danish hospitals assisted by a natural language processing model\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Danish Health Care Registers rely on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-classification and stand as a widely utilized resource for health epidemiological research. Eating disorders are multifaceted syndromes where two distinctive diagnoses are defined, anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). However, the validity of the registered diagnoses remains to be verified. Manuel chart review is often the method for validation of diagnosis codes, but there is limited research on how natural language processing (NLP) models could enhance this process.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the accuracy of the clinical use of ICD-10 diagnosis codes F50.0, F50.1, F50.2, and F50.3 in the Danish Health Care Registers, using a manual chart review assisted by NLP.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>From a cohort of all individuals attending hospitals in Region of Southern Denmark with registered electronic health information, we extracted medical information from the electronic health journal on 100 individuals with each of the four diagnosis codes. After extraction, an NLP model with regular expression search patterns identified relevant text passages for manual chart review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 372 of the 400 diagnosis codes (93%) were correct. A diagnosis code for AN was correct in 90% of instances, 96% for atypical AN, 96% for BN and 90% for an atypical BN diagnosis code.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found that the accuracy of a diagnosis code F50.0, F50.1, F50.2, and F50.3 to be high. This confirms that the generally well-documented validity of the Danish health care registers also applies to the eating disorder diagnoses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624005405\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624005405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of anorexia nervosa and Bulimia nervosa diagnosis coding in Danish hospitals assisted by a natural language processing model
Introduction
The Danish Health Care Registers rely on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-classification and stand as a widely utilized resource for health epidemiological research. Eating disorders are multifaceted syndromes where two distinctive diagnoses are defined, anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). However, the validity of the registered diagnoses remains to be verified. Manuel chart review is often the method for validation of diagnosis codes, but there is limited research on how natural language processing (NLP) models could enhance this process.
Objective
To investigate the accuracy of the clinical use of ICD-10 diagnosis codes F50.0, F50.1, F50.2, and F50.3 in the Danish Health Care Registers, using a manual chart review assisted by NLP.
Method
From a cohort of all individuals attending hospitals in Region of Southern Denmark with registered electronic health information, we extracted medical information from the electronic health journal on 100 individuals with each of the four diagnosis codes. After extraction, an NLP model with regular expression search patterns identified relevant text passages for manual chart review.
Results
Overall, 372 of the 400 diagnosis codes (93%) were correct. A diagnosis code for AN was correct in 90% of instances, 96% for atypical AN, 96% for BN and 90% for an atypical BN diagnosis code.
Conclusion
We found that the accuracy of a diagnosis code F50.0, F50.1, F50.2, and F50.3 to be high. This confirms that the generally well-documented validity of the Danish health care registers also applies to the eating disorder diagnoses.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research:
(1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors;
(2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology;
(3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;