探索人口因素和富裕程度对工作场所分心的影响:跨国分析

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Nursing Management Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1155/2024/2431300
Emad Shdaifat, Tamadur Shudayfat, Noha Al-Shdayfat, Nora Alotaibi, Mona Alduhaileb
{"title":"探索人口因素和富裕程度对工作场所分心的影响:跨国分析","authors":"Emad Shdaifat,&nbsp;Tamadur Shudayfat,&nbsp;Noha Al-Shdayfat,&nbsp;Nora Alotaibi,&nbsp;Mona Alduhaileb","doi":"10.1155/2024/2431300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the influence of demographic factors and flourishing on workplace distractions in a cross-country analysis of Saudi Arabia and Jordan.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in two government hospitals: one in eastern Saudi Arabia and the other in northern Jordan. Data were collected from the nurses using convenience sampling. The required sample size was determined using the G∗Power software, with a target of 242 nurses per country, resulting in 484 participants. Ultimately, the final sample consisted of 437 nurses: 222 from Saudi Arabia and 215 from Jordan. Two online instruments were used to collect data on the distractions and flourishing.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The study found that “using the Internet” and “using the phone” were the most time-consuming distractions among nurses, while “watching TV” was the least time-consuming. There were significant associations between demographics and distractions, with participants from Saudi Arabia having lower distraction scores than participants from Jordan. Younger participants were more distracted than older participants, whereas male participants were more distracted than female participants were. Smokers and individuals with less expertise exhibit higher levels of distraction. Furthermore, degree of education was associated with higher levels of distraction. Nurses in Saudi Arabia experience a much greater loss of productivity due to distractions than their Jordanian counterparts. Regression analysis revealed that experience, “Mental and Physical Health” domain scores, smoking status, and educational level all highly predicted distraction levels among Saudi Arabian and Jordanian nurses, accounting for approximately 9.6% of the differences in distraction.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> In this cross-country study on workplace distractions among Saudi and Jordanian nurses, “using the Internet” and “using the phone” emerged as the most time-consuming distractions. Younger age, male sex, smoking, and less experience are associated with higher distraction levels. Additionally, higher education levels were linked to increased distraction. Implementing employee flourishing activities can help reduce distractions and enhance productivity. This study offers valuable insights into improving nurses’ performance and well-being.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2431300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Influence of Demographic Factors and Flourishing on Workplace Distractions: A Cross-Country Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Emad Shdaifat,&nbsp;Tamadur Shudayfat,&nbsp;Noha Al-Shdayfat,&nbsp;Nora Alotaibi,&nbsp;Mona Alduhaileb\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2431300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the influence of demographic factors and flourishing on workplace distractions in a cross-country analysis of Saudi Arabia and Jordan.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in two government hospitals: one in eastern Saudi Arabia and the other in northern Jordan. Data were collected from the nurses using convenience sampling. The required sample size was determined using the G∗Power software, with a target of 242 nurses per country, resulting in 484 participants. Ultimately, the final sample consisted of 437 nurses: 222 from Saudi Arabia and 215 from Jordan. Two online instruments were used to collect data on the distractions and flourishing.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> The study found that “using the Internet” and “using the phone” were the most time-consuming distractions among nurses, while “watching TV” was the least time-consuming. There were significant associations between demographics and distractions, with participants from Saudi Arabia having lower distraction scores than participants from Jordan. Younger participants were more distracted than older participants, whereas male participants were more distracted than female participants were. Smokers and individuals with less expertise exhibit higher levels of distraction. Furthermore, degree of education was associated with higher levels of distraction. Nurses in Saudi Arabia experience a much greater loss of productivity due to distractions than their Jordanian counterparts. Regression analysis revealed that experience, “Mental and Physical Health” domain scores, smoking status, and educational level all highly predicted distraction levels among Saudi Arabian and Jordanian nurses, accounting for approximately 9.6% of the differences in distraction.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> In this cross-country study on workplace distractions among Saudi and Jordanian nurses, “using the Internet” and “using the phone” emerged as the most time-consuming distractions. Younger age, male sex, smoking, and less experience are associated with higher distraction levels. Additionally, higher education levels were linked to increased distraction. Implementing employee flourishing activities can help reduce distractions and enhance productivity. This study offers valuable insights into improving nurses’ performance and well-being.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2431300\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2431300\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/2431300","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过对沙特阿拉伯和约旦的跨国分析,探讨人口因素和繁荣对工作场所分心的影响。 研究方法这项横断面比较研究在两家政府医院进行:一家位于沙特阿拉伯东部,另一家位于约旦北部。采用便利抽样法从护士中收集数据。使用 G∗Power 软件确定了所需的样本量,目标是每个国家 242 名护士,最终确定了 484 名参与者。最终,最终样本由 437 名护士组成:其中 222 人来自沙特阿拉伯,215 人来自约旦。我们使用了两种在线工具来收集有关分心和蓬勃发展的数据。 研究结果研究发现,"使用互联网 "和 "使用电话 "是护士最耗时的分心行为,而 "看电视 "耗时最少。人口统计学与分心之间存在明显的关联,来自沙特阿拉伯的参与者的分心得分低于来自约旦的参与者。年轻的参与者比年长的参与者更容易分心,而男性参与者比女性参与者更容易分心。吸烟者和专业知识较少的人分心程度较高。此外,教育程度也与注意力分散程度有关。与约旦护士相比,沙特阿拉伯护士因分心而损失的工作效率要高得多。回归分析表明,经验、"身心健康 "领域得分、吸烟状况和受教育程度均可高度预测沙特阿拉伯和约旦护士的分心程度,约占分心差异的 9.6%。 结论在这项关于沙特阿拉伯和约旦护士工作分心情况的跨国研究中,"使用互联网 "和 "使用电话 "成为最耗时的分心行为。年龄较小、性别为男性、吸烟和经验较少与分心程度较高有关。此外,受教育程度越高,分心程度越高。开展员工蓬勃发展活动有助于减少分心,提高工作效率。这项研究为提高护士的绩效和幸福感提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Influence of Demographic Factors and Flourishing on Workplace Distractions: A Cross-Country Analysis

Objective: To explore the influence of demographic factors and flourishing on workplace distractions in a cross-country analysis of Saudi Arabia and Jordan.

Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in two government hospitals: one in eastern Saudi Arabia and the other in northern Jordan. Data were collected from the nurses using convenience sampling. The required sample size was determined using the G∗Power software, with a target of 242 nurses per country, resulting in 484 participants. Ultimately, the final sample consisted of 437 nurses: 222 from Saudi Arabia and 215 from Jordan. Two online instruments were used to collect data on the distractions and flourishing.

Results: The study found that “using the Internet” and “using the phone” were the most time-consuming distractions among nurses, while “watching TV” was the least time-consuming. There were significant associations between demographics and distractions, with participants from Saudi Arabia having lower distraction scores than participants from Jordan. Younger participants were more distracted than older participants, whereas male participants were more distracted than female participants were. Smokers and individuals with less expertise exhibit higher levels of distraction. Furthermore, degree of education was associated with higher levels of distraction. Nurses in Saudi Arabia experience a much greater loss of productivity due to distractions than their Jordanian counterparts. Regression analysis revealed that experience, “Mental and Physical Health” domain scores, smoking status, and educational level all highly predicted distraction levels among Saudi Arabian and Jordanian nurses, accounting for approximately 9.6% of the differences in distraction.

Conclusion: In this cross-country study on workplace distractions among Saudi and Jordanian nurses, “using the Internet” and “using the phone” emerged as the most time-consuming distractions. Younger age, male sex, smoking, and less experience are associated with higher distraction levels. Additionally, higher education levels were linked to increased distraction. Implementing employee flourishing activities can help reduce distractions and enhance productivity. This study offers valuable insights into improving nurses’ performance and well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Swedish Primary Healthcare Nurses’ Discontent With Their Current Job Determinants of First-Line Nurse Managers’ Span of Control: A Delphi Study The Impact of Medical Explainable Artificial Intelligence on Nurses’ Innovation Behaviour: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach Exploring the Influence of Demographic Factors and Flourishing on Workplace Distractions: A Cross-Country Analysis Identifying Accessibility and Equity Defects of Elderly Care Services in Developing Countries: Insights From Xiamen City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1