流出道室性早搏消融术中的额外病变组:随机临床试验

IF 3.784 3区 化学 Q1 Chemistry ACS Combinatorial Science Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2975
Kexin Wang,Fu Yi,Fangyi Xiao,Cao Zou,Yuzhen Zhang,Yuegang Wang,Linsheng Shi,Chengzong Li,Long Chen,Shuanglun Xie,Wenzhi Shen,Ning Zhang,Qiang Wu,Qiang Xu,Yuan Ji,Cheng Wang,Zhiyu Lin,Youquan Wei,Zhongbao Ruan,Yumin Sun,Weizhu Ju,Minglong Chen,
{"title":"流出道室性早搏消融术中的额外病变组:随机临床试验","authors":"Kexin Wang,Fu Yi,Fangyi Xiao,Cao Zou,Yuzhen Zhang,Yuegang Wang,Linsheng Shi,Chengzong Li,Long Chen,Shuanglun Xie,Wenzhi Shen,Ning Zhang,Qiang Wu,Qiang Xu,Yuan Ji,Cheng Wang,Zhiyu Lin,Youquan Wei,Zhongbao Ruan,Yumin Sun,Weizhu Ju,Minglong Chen,","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nRecurrence remains a challenge after ablation of outflow tract premature ventricular contractions (OT-PVCs). Although adding additional lesions next to the index effective ablation site is sometimes performed to reinforce the ablation, it remains uncertain whether this approach is effective.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo test the hypothesis that additional ablation lesions would reduce the recurrence rate compared with single-point ablation at the index effective site for the ablation of OT-PVCs.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThis study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients receiving their first catheter ablation for OT-PVCs were enrolled from 18 hospitals in China between October 2021 and February 2023. Scheduled follow-up duration was 3 months after the procedure.\r\n\r\nIntervention\r\nAfter identifying the target point and eliminating the PVC by a single-point ablation, patients were randomized 1:1 into an additional ablation group or a control group.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe primary end point of the study was freedom from PVC recurrence (≥80% reduction of PVC burden, which is the number of PVCs in 24 hours/total heartbeats in 24 hours × 100%) from baseline to 3 months postprocedure.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nOf 308 patients enrolled in the study, 286 (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [14.6] years; 173 female [60.5%]) were randomized to the additional ablation or the control group. The additional ablation group had a mean (SD) of 6.3 (1.1) radiofrequency applications, whereas the control group (single-point ablation group) had a mean (SD) of 1 (0) radiofrequency application. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 3.2 (0) months, the rate of freedom from PVCs was significantly higher in the additional ablation group (139 of 142 [97.9%]) compared with the control group (115 of 139 [82.7%]; P < .001). Patients in the additional ablation group also had a more substantial reduction in PVC burden than the control group (mean [SD] reduction, 23.0% [10.5%] vs 19.0% [10.4%]; P = .002). There were no severe periprocedural complications in either group.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nThis randomized clinical trial showed a benefit of additional ablation in reducing the recurrence of OT-PVCs compared with the single-point ablation strategy, without increased complication risk. Additional ablations surrounding the index effective ablation point should be considered in OT-PVC ablation.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nChinese Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200055340.","PeriodicalId":14,"journal":{"name":"ACS Combinatorial Science","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7840,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additional Lesion Sets in Ablation of Outflow Tract Premature Ventricular Contractions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kexin Wang,Fu Yi,Fangyi Xiao,Cao Zou,Yuzhen Zhang,Yuegang Wang,Linsheng Shi,Chengzong Li,Long Chen,Shuanglun Xie,Wenzhi Shen,Ning Zhang,Qiang Wu,Qiang Xu,Yuan Ji,Cheng Wang,Zhiyu Lin,Youquan Wei,Zhongbao Ruan,Yumin Sun,Weizhu Ju,Minglong Chen,\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance\\r\\nRecurrence remains a challenge after ablation of outflow tract premature ventricular contractions (OT-PVCs). Although adding additional lesions next to the index effective ablation site is sometimes performed to reinforce the ablation, it remains uncertain whether this approach is effective.\\r\\n\\r\\nObjective\\r\\nTo test the hypothesis that additional ablation lesions would reduce the recurrence rate compared with single-point ablation at the index effective site for the ablation of OT-PVCs.\\r\\n\\r\\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\\r\\nThis study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients receiving their first catheter ablation for OT-PVCs were enrolled from 18 hospitals in China between October 2021 and February 2023. Scheduled follow-up duration was 3 months after the procedure.\\r\\n\\r\\nIntervention\\r\\nAfter identifying the target point and eliminating the PVC by a single-point ablation, patients were randomized 1:1 into an additional ablation group or a control group.\\r\\n\\r\\nMain Outcomes and Measures\\r\\nThe primary end point of the study was freedom from PVC recurrence (≥80% reduction of PVC burden, which is the number of PVCs in 24 hours/total heartbeats in 24 hours × 100%) from baseline to 3 months postprocedure.\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nOf 308 patients enrolled in the study, 286 (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [14.6] years; 173 female [60.5%]) were randomized to the additional ablation or the control group. The additional ablation group had a mean (SD) of 6.3 (1.1) radiofrequency applications, whereas the control group (single-point ablation group) had a mean (SD) of 1 (0) radiofrequency application. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 3.2 (0) months, the rate of freedom from PVCs was significantly higher in the additional ablation group (139 of 142 [97.9%]) compared with the control group (115 of 139 [82.7%]; P < .001). Patients in the additional ablation group also had a more substantial reduction in PVC burden than the control group (mean [SD] reduction, 23.0% [10.5%] vs 19.0% [10.4%]; P = .002). There were no severe periprocedural complications in either group.\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions and Relevance\\r\\nThis randomized clinical trial showed a benefit of additional ablation in reducing the recurrence of OT-PVCs compared with the single-point ablation strategy, without increased complication risk. Additional ablations surrounding the index effective ablation point should be considered in OT-PVC ablation.\\r\\n\\r\\nTrial Registration\\r\\nChinese Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200055340.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Combinatorial Science\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7840,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Combinatorial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2975\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Combinatorial Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性流出道室性早搏(OT-PVC)消融术后复发仍是一个难题。尽管有时会在指数有效消融部位旁增加额外的病灶以加强消融效果,但这种方法是否有效仍不确定。本研究是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机临床试验。2021年10月至2023年2月期间,来自中国18家医院的首次接受导管消融术的OT-PVC患者被纳入研究。干预措施在确定靶点并通过单点消融消除PVC后,将患者按1:1随机分为额外消融组或对照组。主要结果和测量指标研究的主要终点是自基线至术后3个月期间PVC不再复发(PVC负荷减少≥80%,即24小时内PVC次数/24小时内总心跳次数×100%)。结果在308名参与研究的患者中,286名(平均[标码]年龄为49.2[14.6]岁;173名女性[60.5%])被随机分为额外消融组或对照组。额外消融组平均(标清)应用了 6.3(1.1)次射频,而对照组(单点消融组)平均(标清)应用了 1(0)次射频。中位(IQR)随访 3.2 (0) 个月后,额外消融组(142 例中有 139 例[97.9%])的 PVC 消失率明显高于对照组(139 例中有 115 例[82.7%];P < .001)。与对照组相比,额外消融组患者的 PVC 负荷减少幅度更大(平均 [SD] 减少幅度,23.0% [10.5%] vs 19.0% [10.4%];P = .002)。结论和相关性这项随机临床试验显示,与单点消融策略相比,额外消融在降低 OT-PVC 复发率方面具有优势,且不会增加并发症风险。在 OT-PVC 消融术中,应考虑在指数有效消融点周围进行额外消融:ChiCTR2200055340。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Additional Lesion Sets in Ablation of Outflow Tract Premature Ventricular Contractions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance Recurrence remains a challenge after ablation of outflow tract premature ventricular contractions (OT-PVCs). Although adding additional lesions next to the index effective ablation site is sometimes performed to reinforce the ablation, it remains uncertain whether this approach is effective. Objective To test the hypothesis that additional ablation lesions would reduce the recurrence rate compared with single-point ablation at the index effective site for the ablation of OT-PVCs. Design, Setting, and Participants This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients receiving their first catheter ablation for OT-PVCs were enrolled from 18 hospitals in China between October 2021 and February 2023. Scheduled follow-up duration was 3 months after the procedure. Intervention After identifying the target point and eliminating the PVC by a single-point ablation, patients were randomized 1:1 into an additional ablation group or a control group. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point of the study was freedom from PVC recurrence (≥80% reduction of PVC burden, which is the number of PVCs in 24 hours/total heartbeats in 24 hours × 100%) from baseline to 3 months postprocedure. Results Of 308 patients enrolled in the study, 286 (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [14.6] years; 173 female [60.5%]) were randomized to the additional ablation or the control group. The additional ablation group had a mean (SD) of 6.3 (1.1) radiofrequency applications, whereas the control group (single-point ablation group) had a mean (SD) of 1 (0) radiofrequency application. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 3.2 (0) months, the rate of freedom from PVCs was significantly higher in the additional ablation group (139 of 142 [97.9%]) compared with the control group (115 of 139 [82.7%]; P < .001). Patients in the additional ablation group also had a more substantial reduction in PVC burden than the control group (mean [SD] reduction, 23.0% [10.5%] vs 19.0% [10.4%]; P = .002). There were no severe periprocedural complications in either group. Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial showed a benefit of additional ablation in reducing the recurrence of OT-PVCs compared with the single-point ablation strategy, without increased complication risk. Additional ablations surrounding the index effective ablation point should be considered in OT-PVC ablation. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200055340.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Combinatorial Science
ACS Combinatorial Science CHEMISTRY, APPLIED-CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry has been relaunched as ACS Combinatorial Science under the leadership of new Editor-in-Chief M.G. Finn of The Scripps Research Institute. The journal features an expanded scope and will build upon the legacy of the Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry, a highly cited leader in the field.
期刊最新文献
Reply. The role of endometrial scratching in IVF/ICSI: a critical appraisal of individual participant data meta-analysis. The role of endometrial scratching in IVF/ICSI: a critical appraisal of individual participant data meta-analysis. Does the holy grail of the evidence pyramid vindicate the controversial practice of endometrial scratching or is there room for healthy skepticism? Reply. How much evidence is needed to stop calling endometrial scratching 'controversial'? Cellular mechanisms of monozygotic twinning: clues from assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1