Xinyan Lu , Erica F. Andersen , Rahul Banerjee , Celeste C. Eno , Patrick R. Gonzales , Angela M. Lager , Patricia M. Miron , Trevor Pugh , Fabiola Quintero-Rivera , Virginia C. Thurston , Daynna J. Wolff , Jian Zhao , Linda B. Baughn
{"title":"9.多发性骨髓瘤 FISH 研究检测和报告的最佳实践:CGC 工作组的建议","authors":"Xinyan Lu , Erica F. Andersen , Rahul Banerjee , Celeste C. Eno , Patrick R. Gonzales , Angela M. Lager , Patricia M. Miron , Trevor Pugh , Fabiola Quintero-Rivera , Virginia C. Thurston , Daynna J. Wolff , Jian Zhao , Linda B. Baughn","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy with recurrent primary and secondary cytogenetic abnormalities having prognostic and therapeutic implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold-standard assay to detect these genetic abnormalities. However, FISH testing for MM is heterogeneous among clinical laboratories, with differences in plasma cell isolation, FISH panel design, and reporting practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CGC Plasma Cell Neoplasm workgroup conducted a survey targeting the international MM clinician community on utilization of FISH and result reporting/interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 102 survey responses representing 14 countries. Most (74%) MM clinicians utilize their own in-house FISH testing service with 81% reporting plasma cell enrichment was performed by their lab. 90% of respondents desired FISH at diagnosis, 72% during disease progression and 40% for treatment/response assessment. The most-requested FISH probes included: TP53 (99%), t(4;14) (92%), 1q gain/amplification (91%), t(14;16) (90%), t(11;14) (85%), t(14;20) (76%), 1p deletion (67%), while FISH for ploidy status, deletion 13q/-13, t(6;14), MYC rearrangement, and other rare IG rearrangements were ranked lower in importance (10-50%). About 40% of respondents were dissatisfied with clarity, summary, and interpretation of FISH reports. When challenged to interpret a FISH report, only 2% of responders interpreted results correctly and the majority were either unsure or misinterpreted the report.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study showed that significant improvements are needed by clinical lab directors in MM FISH report clarity to benefit both the clinician and patient. We propose standardization of best MM FISH practices and reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49225,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genetics","volume":"286 ","pages":"Pages S3-S4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"9. Best practices for testing and reporting of FISH studies in multiple myeloma: Recommendations from the CGC working group\",\"authors\":\"Xinyan Lu , Erica F. Andersen , Rahul Banerjee , Celeste C. Eno , Patrick R. Gonzales , Angela M. Lager , Patricia M. Miron , Trevor Pugh , Fabiola Quintero-Rivera , Virginia C. Thurston , Daynna J. Wolff , Jian Zhao , Linda B. Baughn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy with recurrent primary and secondary cytogenetic abnormalities having prognostic and therapeutic implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold-standard assay to detect these genetic abnormalities. However, FISH testing for MM is heterogeneous among clinical laboratories, with differences in plasma cell isolation, FISH panel design, and reporting practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CGC Plasma Cell Neoplasm workgroup conducted a survey targeting the international MM clinician community on utilization of FISH and result reporting/interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 102 survey responses representing 14 countries. Most (74%) MM clinicians utilize their own in-house FISH testing service with 81% reporting plasma cell enrichment was performed by their lab. 90% of respondents desired FISH at diagnosis, 72% during disease progression and 40% for treatment/response assessment. The most-requested FISH probes included: TP53 (99%), t(4;14) (92%), 1q gain/amplification (91%), t(14;16) (90%), t(11;14) (85%), t(14;20) (76%), 1p deletion (67%), while FISH for ploidy status, deletion 13q/-13, t(6;14), MYC rearrangement, and other rare IG rearrangements were ranked lower in importance (10-50%). About 40% of respondents were dissatisfied with clarity, summary, and interpretation of FISH reports. When challenged to interpret a FISH report, only 2% of responders interpreted results correctly and the majority were either unsure or misinterpreted the report.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study showed that significant improvements are needed by clinical lab directors in MM FISH report clarity to benefit both the clinician and patient. We propose standardization of best MM FISH practices and reporting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"volume\":\"286 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S3-S4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000498\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)仍是一种无法治愈的浆细胞恶性肿瘤,其反复出现的原发性和继发性细胞遗传学异常对预后和治疗都有影响。荧光原位杂交(FISH)是检测这些基因异常的金标准检测方法。方法 CGC 浆细胞肿瘤工作组针对国际 MM 临床医生群体就 FISH 的使用和结果报告/解释进行了一项调查。大多数(74%)MM 临床医生使用自己的内部 FISH 检测服务,81% 的人报告说他们的实验室进行了血浆细胞富集。90%的受访者希望在诊断时进行FISH检测,72%的受访者希望在疾病进展期间进行FISH检测,40%的受访者希望在治疗/反应评估时进行FISH检测。最需要的 FISH 探针包括TP53(99%)、t(4;14)(92%)、1q 增益/扩增(91%)、t(14;16)(90%)、t(11;14)(85%)、t(14;20)(76%)、1p 缺失(67%),而倍性状态、13q/-13 缺失、t(6;14)、MYC 重排和其他罕见 IG 重排的 FISH 重要性较低(10-50%)。约 40% 的受访者对 FISH 报告的清晰度、摘要和解释不满意。结论我们的研究表明,临床实验室主任需要在 MM FISH 报告的清晰度方面做出重大改进,以使临床医生和患者都能从中受益。我们建议对 MM FISH 的最佳实践和报告进行标准化。
9. Best practices for testing and reporting of FISH studies in multiple myeloma: Recommendations from the CGC working group
Purpose
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy with recurrent primary and secondary cytogenetic abnormalities having prognostic and therapeutic implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold-standard assay to detect these genetic abnormalities. However, FISH testing for MM is heterogeneous among clinical laboratories, with differences in plasma cell isolation, FISH panel design, and reporting practices.
Methods
The CGC Plasma Cell Neoplasm workgroup conducted a survey targeting the international MM clinician community on utilization of FISH and result reporting/interpretation.
Results
There were 102 survey responses representing 14 countries. Most (74%) MM clinicians utilize their own in-house FISH testing service with 81% reporting plasma cell enrichment was performed by their lab. 90% of respondents desired FISH at diagnosis, 72% during disease progression and 40% for treatment/response assessment. The most-requested FISH probes included: TP53 (99%), t(4;14) (92%), 1q gain/amplification (91%), t(14;16) (90%), t(11;14) (85%), t(14;20) (76%), 1p deletion (67%), while FISH for ploidy status, deletion 13q/-13, t(6;14), MYC rearrangement, and other rare IG rearrangements were ranked lower in importance (10-50%). About 40% of respondents were dissatisfied with clarity, summary, and interpretation of FISH reports. When challenged to interpret a FISH report, only 2% of responders interpreted results correctly and the majority were either unsure or misinterpreted the report.
Conclusion
Our study showed that significant improvements are needed by clinical lab directors in MM FISH report clarity to benefit both the clinician and patient. We propose standardization of best MM FISH practices and reporting.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Cancer Genetics is to publish high quality scientific papers on the cellular, genetic and molecular aspects of cancer, including cancer predisposition and clinical diagnostic applications. Specific areas of interest include descriptions of new chromosomal, molecular or epigenetic alterations in benign and malignant diseases; novel laboratory approaches for identification and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements or genomic alterations in cancer cells; correlation of genetic changes with pathology and clinical presentation; and the molecular genetics of cancer predisposition. To reach a basic science and clinical multidisciplinary audience, we welcome original full-length articles, reviews, meeting summaries, brief reports, and letters to the editor.