Ashley Young MD, Eli Stein MD, Matthew Rowland MD, Taher Valika MD, Saied Ghadersohi MD, Inbal Hazkani MD
{"title":"在呼吸系统受损的儿童中使用 heliox 的效果:10 年的单一机构经验","authors":"Ashley Young MD, Eli Stein MD, Matthew Rowland MD, Taher Valika MD, Saied Ghadersohi MD, Inbal Hazkani MD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Heliox, a mixture of helium and oxygen, has been shown to improve laminar airflow and decrease airway resistance in children. This study aims to describe the outcomes of heliox use in children with respiratory compromise and to identify variables associated with a need for airway surgical intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study of patients who received heliox between 2012 and 2022 at a tertiary care children's hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A hundred and thirty-eight heliox treatments were recorded in 119 children. Twelve patients were excluded. Most (<i>n</i> = 100, 84%) patients had significant comorbidities. On average, patients spent a cumulative mean of 94 ± 187 h on heliox therapy per hospital admission. Patients with croup or asthma without known airway pathology presented at an older age than patients with other indications for heliox therapy (4.0 ± 4.7 vs. 2.2 ± 3.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and were significantly less likely to have background diseases (<i>n</i> = 14, 52% vs. <i>n</i> = 74, 93%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Overall, 51 (47.7%) patients were recommended tracheostomy placement, airway reconstruction, or palliative care. Cumulative use of heliox for more than 47 h was associated with an increased risk of needing tracheostomy or airway reconstruction (odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence intervals 2.56–14.13, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). In multivariable regression analysis, neuromuscular disease, intracranial neuropathology, and cumulative time of heliox were associated with a need for definitive airway intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Heliox may be used as a temporizing agent in children with upper airway obstruction. The effectiveness of heliox use for more than 47 h in children, especially in the presence of neuromuscular disease and intracranial neuropathology should be reconsidered.</p>\n \n <p>Level of evidence: 4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of heliox use in children with respiratory compromise: A 10-year single institution experience\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Young MD, Eli Stein MD, Matthew Rowland MD, Taher Valika MD, Saied Ghadersohi MD, Inbal Hazkani MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Heliox, a mixture of helium and oxygen, has been shown to improve laminar airflow and decrease airway resistance in children. This study aims to describe the outcomes of heliox use in children with respiratory compromise and to identify variables associated with a need for airway surgical intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective cohort study of patients who received heliox between 2012 and 2022 at a tertiary care children's hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A hundred and thirty-eight heliox treatments were recorded in 119 children. Twelve patients were excluded. Most (<i>n</i> = 100, 84%) patients had significant comorbidities. On average, patients spent a cumulative mean of 94 ± 187 h on heliox therapy per hospital admission. Patients with croup or asthma without known airway pathology presented at an older age than patients with other indications for heliox therapy (4.0 ± 4.7 vs. 2.2 ± 3.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and were significantly less likely to have background diseases (<i>n</i> = 14, 52% vs. <i>n</i> = 74, 93%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Overall, 51 (47.7%) patients were recommended tracheostomy placement, airway reconstruction, or palliative care. Cumulative use of heliox for more than 47 h was associated with an increased risk of needing tracheostomy or airway reconstruction (odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence intervals 2.56–14.13, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). In multivariable regression analysis, neuromuscular disease, intracranial neuropathology, and cumulative time of heliox were associated with a need for definitive airway intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Heliox may be used as a temporizing agent in children with upper airway obstruction. The effectiveness of heliox use for more than 47 h in children, especially in the presence of neuromuscular disease and intracranial neuropathology should be reconsidered.</p>\\n \\n <p>Level of evidence: 4.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of heliox use in children with respiratory compromise: A 10-year single institution experience
Objective
Heliox, a mixture of helium and oxygen, has been shown to improve laminar airflow and decrease airway resistance in children. This study aims to describe the outcomes of heliox use in children with respiratory compromise and to identify variables associated with a need for airway surgical intervention.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study of patients who received heliox between 2012 and 2022 at a tertiary care children's hospital.
Results
A hundred and thirty-eight heliox treatments were recorded in 119 children. Twelve patients were excluded. Most (n = 100, 84%) patients had significant comorbidities. On average, patients spent a cumulative mean of 94 ± 187 h on heliox therapy per hospital admission. Patients with croup or asthma without known airway pathology presented at an older age than patients with other indications for heliox therapy (4.0 ± 4.7 vs. 2.2 ± 3.6 years, p = 0.04) and were significantly less likely to have background diseases (n = 14, 52% vs. n = 74, 93%, p < 0.0001). Overall, 51 (47.7%) patients were recommended tracheostomy placement, airway reconstruction, or palliative care. Cumulative use of heliox for more than 47 h was associated with an increased risk of needing tracheostomy or airway reconstruction (odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence intervals 2.56–14.13, p < 0.0001). In multivariable regression analysis, neuromuscular disease, intracranial neuropathology, and cumulative time of heliox were associated with a need for definitive airway intervention.
Conclusions
Heliox may be used as a temporizing agent in children with upper airway obstruction. The effectiveness of heliox use for more than 47 h in children, especially in the presence of neuromuscular disease and intracranial neuropathology should be reconsidered.