投资者与公司之间的互动能否缓解ESG评级分歧?来自中国的证据

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103612
{"title":"投资者与公司之间的互动能否缓解ESG评级分歧?来自中国的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study empirically examines whether investor-firm interactions significantly influence the ESG rating disagreement among A-share listed companies in China. We use Q&amp;A data between 2015 and 2021 from the Easy Interaction and <em>E</em>-Interaction platforms of the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges (SZSE and SSE). Our results reveal that investor-firm interaction can significantly reduce the ESG rating divergence, and this result remains robust after robustness tests. The mechanism test suggests that interactions related to ESG theme can improve the ESG disclosure quality and increase ESG practices; this leads to reduced information asymmetry, thus easing rating divergence. Further, the effect is more pronounced when listed companies' ESG disclosures are similar to those in their industry, non-centralized enterprises, low corporate governance level, and fewer green investors. From the ESG rating divergence mitigation perspective, this study provides empirical evidence on the economic consequences of emerging capital markets regarding investor-firm interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can investor-firm interactions mitigate ESG rating divergence? Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study empirically examines whether investor-firm interactions significantly influence the ESG rating disagreement among A-share listed companies in China. We use Q&amp;A data between 2015 and 2021 from the Easy Interaction and <em>E</em>-Interaction platforms of the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges (SZSE and SSE). Our results reveal that investor-firm interaction can significantly reduce the ESG rating divergence, and this result remains robust after robustness tests. The mechanism test suggests that interactions related to ESG theme can improve the ESG disclosure quality and increase ESG practices; this leads to reduced information asymmetry, thus easing rating divergence. Further, the effect is more pronounced when listed companies' ESG disclosures are similar to those in their industry, non-centralized enterprises, low corporate governance level, and fewer green investors. From the ESG rating divergence mitigation perspective, this study provides empirical evidence on the economic consequences of emerging capital markets regarding investor-firm interactions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005441\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究实证检验了投资者与公司之间的互动是否会显著影响中国 A 股上市公司的 ESG 评级分歧。我们使用了深沪证券交易所(深交所和上交所)"互动易 "和 "电子互动 "平台2015年至2021年的Q&A数据。结果表明,投资者与公司的互动能够显著降低ESG评级背离,并且这一结果在经过稳健性检验后依然稳健。机制检验表明,与 ESG 主题相关的互动可以提高 ESG 信息披露质量,增加 ESG 实践,从而减少信息不对称,缓解评级背离。此外,当上市公司的 ESG 信息披露与同行业相似、企业非集中化、公司治理水平较低、绿色投资者较少时,效果更为明显。从缓解 ESG 评级分歧的角度来看,本研究为新兴资本市场在投资者与企业互动方面的经济后果提供了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can investor-firm interactions mitigate ESG rating divergence? Evidence from China
This study empirically examines whether investor-firm interactions significantly influence the ESG rating disagreement among A-share listed companies in China. We use Q&A data between 2015 and 2021 from the Easy Interaction and E-Interaction platforms of the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges (SZSE and SSE). Our results reveal that investor-firm interaction can significantly reduce the ESG rating divergence, and this result remains robust after robustness tests. The mechanism test suggests that interactions related to ESG theme can improve the ESG disclosure quality and increase ESG practices; this leads to reduced information asymmetry, thus easing rating divergence. Further, the effect is more pronounced when listed companies' ESG disclosures are similar to those in their industry, non-centralized enterprises, low corporate governance level, and fewer green investors. From the ESG rating divergence mitigation perspective, this study provides empirical evidence on the economic consequences of emerging capital markets regarding investor-firm interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Strategic tone management in ESG reports and ESG risk Investigating investor attention to carbon risk from a supply chain perspective Does social responsibility reform curb corporate greenwashing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China Fee structure and equity fund manager’s optimal locking in profits strategy Beyond the balance sheet: Assessing corporate governance through the Lens of debtholders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1