地球磁鞘中的磁场:模型与观测

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1029/2023JA032393
M. Vandas, E. Romashets
{"title":"地球磁鞘中的磁场:模型与观测","authors":"M. Vandas,&nbsp;E. Romashets","doi":"10.1029/2023JA032393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Magnetic field measurements in the Earth's magnetosheath are compared with four analytical models, namely Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778), Romashets and Vandas (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026006), Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), and Romashets et al. (2010), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.010). The bow shock and the magnetopause are modeled as paraboloids in all models except that of Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), in which they are assumed to be spheroids. 34 magnetosheath crossings by spacecraft are analyzed in detail and it is concluded that the model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) performs the best.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic Field in the Earth's Magnetosheath: Models Versus Observations\",\"authors\":\"M. Vandas,&nbsp;E. Romashets\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023JA032393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Magnetic field measurements in the Earth's magnetosheath are compared with four analytical models, namely Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778), Romashets and Vandas (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026006), Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), and Romashets et al. (2010), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.010). The bow shock and the magnetopause are modeled as paraboloids in all models except that of Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), in which they are assumed to be spheroids. 34 magnetosheath crossings by spacecraft are analyzed in detail and it is concluded that the model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) performs the best.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JA032393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JA032393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地球磁鞘的磁场测量结果与四个分析模型进行了比较,即 Kobel 和 Flückiger(1994 年),(https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778);Romashets 和 Vandas(2019 年),(https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026006);Vandas 和 Romashets(2019 年),(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007);以及 Romashets 等人(2010 年),(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.010)。除了 Vandas 和 Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007) 的模型假定弓形冲击和磁层顶为球面之外,其他所有模型都将弓形冲击和磁层顶假定为抛物面。详细分析了航天器穿越的 34 个磁鞘,结论是 Kobel 和 Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) 的模型表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Magnetic Field in the Earth's Magnetosheath: Models Versus Observations

Magnetic field measurements in the Earth's magnetosheath are compared with four analytical models, namely Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778), Romashets and Vandas (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026006), Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), and Romashets et al. (2010), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.010). The bow shock and the magnetopause are modeled as paraboloids in all models except that of Vandas and Romashets (2019), (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.07.007), in which they are assumed to be spheroids. 34 magnetosheath crossings by spacecraft are analyzed in detail and it is concluded that the model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994), (https://doi.org/10.1029/94ja01778) performs the best.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the Magnetic and Plasma Environment Upstream of Ganymede Ion Diffusive Transport Across the Separatrix Between the Low-Latitude Mantle and the Plasma Sheet by Kinetic Alfvén Waves: MMS Observation Hemispheric Asymmetry of Ionospheric Poynting Flux During Geomagnetically Quiet Periods Influence of Initial Proton Energy on the Nonlinear Interactions Between Ring Current Protons and He+ Band EMIC Waves Electron Dissipation and Electromagnetic Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1