从电子病历中识别个人和家庭自杀想法和行为史的深度学习

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01266-7
Prakash Adekkanattu, Al’ona Furmanchuk, Yonghui Wu, Aman Pathak, Braja Gopal Patra, Sarah Bost, Destinee Morrow, Grace Hsin-Min Wang, Yuyang Yang, Noah James Forrest, Yuan Luo, Theresa L. Walunas, Weihsuan Lo-Ciganic, Walid Gelad, Jiang Bian, Yuhua Bao, Mark Weiner, David Oslin, Jyotishman Pathak
{"title":"从电子病历中识别个人和家庭自杀想法和行为史的深度学习","authors":"Prakash Adekkanattu, Al’ona Furmanchuk, Yonghui Wu, Aman Pathak, Braja Gopal Patra, Sarah Bost, Destinee Morrow, Grace Hsin-Min Wang, Yuyang Yang, Noah James Forrest, Yuan Luo, Theresa L. Walunas, Weihsuan Lo-Ciganic, Walid Gelad, Jiang Bian, Yuhua Bao, Mark Weiner, David Oslin, Jyotishman Pathak","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01266-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal and family history of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (PSH and FSH, respectively) are significant risk factors associated with suicides. Research is limited in automatic identification of such data from clinical notes in Electronic Health Records. This study developed deep learning (DL) tools utilizing transformer models (Bio_ClinicalBERT and GatorTron) to detect PSH and FSH in clinical notes derived from three academic medical centers, and compared their performance with a rule-based natural language processing tool. For detecting PSH, the rule-based approach obtained an F1-score of 0.75 ± 0.07, while the Bio_ClinicalBERT and GatorTron DL tools scored 0.83 ± 0.09 and 0.84 ± 0.07, respectively. For detecting FSH, the rule-based approach achieved an F1-score of 0.69 ± 0.11, compared to 0.89 ± 0.10 for Bio_ClinicalBERT and 0.92 ± 0.07 for GatorTron. Across sites, the DL tools identified more than 80% of patients at elevated risk for suicide who remain undiagnosed and untreated.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01266-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning for identifying personal and family history of suicidal thoughts and behaviors from EHRs\",\"authors\":\"Prakash Adekkanattu, Al’ona Furmanchuk, Yonghui Wu, Aman Pathak, Braja Gopal Patra, Sarah Bost, Destinee Morrow, Grace Hsin-Min Wang, Yuyang Yang, Noah James Forrest, Yuan Luo, Theresa L. Walunas, Weihsuan Lo-Ciganic, Walid Gelad, Jiang Bian, Yuhua Bao, Mark Weiner, David Oslin, Jyotishman Pathak\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-024-01266-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Personal and family history of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (PSH and FSH, respectively) are significant risk factors associated with suicides. Research is limited in automatic identification of such data from clinical notes in Electronic Health Records. This study developed deep learning (DL) tools utilizing transformer models (Bio_ClinicalBERT and GatorTron) to detect PSH and FSH in clinical notes derived from three academic medical centers, and compared their performance with a rule-based natural language processing tool. For detecting PSH, the rule-based approach obtained an F1-score of 0.75 ± 0.07, while the Bio_ClinicalBERT and GatorTron DL tools scored 0.83 ± 0.09 and 0.84 ± 0.07, respectively. For detecting FSH, the rule-based approach achieved an F1-score of 0.69 ± 0.11, compared to 0.89 ± 0.10 for Bio_ClinicalBERT and 0.92 ± 0.07 for GatorTron. Across sites, the DL tools identified more than 80% of patients at elevated risk for suicide who remain undiagnosed and untreated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01266-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01266-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01266-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个人和家族的自杀想法和行为史(分别为 PSH 和 FSH)是与自杀相关的重要风险因素。从电子健康记录的临床笔记中自动识别此类数据的研究十分有限。本研究利用转换器模型(Bio_ClinicalBERT 和 GatorTron)开发了深度学习(DL)工具,用于检测三个学术医疗中心临床笔记中的 PSH 和 FSH,并将其性能与基于规则的自然语言处理工具进行了比较。在检测 PSH 方面,基于规则的方法获得的 F1 分数为 0.75 ± 0.07,而 Bio_ClinicalBERT 和 GatorTron DL 工具的分数分别为 0.83 ± 0.09 和 0.84 ± 0.07。在检测 FSH 方面,基于规则的方法的 F1 分数为 0.69 ± 0.11,而 Bio_ClinicalBERT 为 0.89 ± 0.10,GatorTron 为 0.92 ± 0.07。在所有研究机构中,DL工具识别出了80%以上的自杀风险较高但仍未得到诊断和治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning for identifying personal and family history of suicidal thoughts and behaviors from EHRs
Personal and family history of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (PSH and FSH, respectively) are significant risk factors associated with suicides. Research is limited in automatic identification of such data from clinical notes in Electronic Health Records. This study developed deep learning (DL) tools utilizing transformer models (Bio_ClinicalBERT and GatorTron) to detect PSH and FSH in clinical notes derived from three academic medical centers, and compared their performance with a rule-based natural language processing tool. For detecting PSH, the rule-based approach obtained an F1-score of 0.75 ± 0.07, while the Bio_ClinicalBERT and GatorTron DL tools scored 0.83 ± 0.09 and 0.84 ± 0.07, respectively. For detecting FSH, the rule-based approach achieved an F1-score of 0.69 ± 0.11, compared to 0.89 ± 0.10 for Bio_ClinicalBERT and 0.92 ± 0.07 for GatorTron. Across sites, the DL tools identified more than 80% of patients at elevated risk for suicide who remain undiagnosed and untreated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence awarded two Nobel Prizes for innovations that will shape the future of medicine Spatial resolution enhancement using deep learning improves chest disease diagnosis based on thick slice CT Learning from the EHR to implement AI in healthcare A data-driven framework for identifying patient subgroups on which an AI/machine learning model may underperform Phenotype driven molecular genetic test recommendation for diagnosing pediatric rare disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1