TMS 诱发电位揭示了帕金森病患者 5 年内枕骨网络受累的情况

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES NPJ Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1038/s41531-024-00793-0
Noa Zifman, Ofri Levy-Lamdan, Tal Hiller, Avner Thaler, Iftach Dolev, Anat Mirelman, Hilla Fogel, Mark Hallett, Inbal Maidan
{"title":"TMS 诱发电位揭示了帕金森病患者 5 年内枕骨网络受累的情况","authors":"Noa Zifman, Ofri Levy-Lamdan, Tal Hiller, Avner Thaler, Iftach Dolev, Anat Mirelman, Hilla Fogel, Mark Hallett, Inbal Maidan","doi":"10.1038/s41531-024-00793-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Distinguishing Parkinson’s disease (PD) subgroups may be achieved by observing network responses to external stimuli. We compared TMS-evoked potential (TEP) measures from stimulation of bilateral motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and visual cortex (V1) between 62 PD patients (age: 69.9 ± 7.5) and 76 healthy controls (age: 69.2 ± 4.3) using a TMS–EEG protocol. TEP measures were analyzed using two-way ANCOVA adjusted for MOCA. PD patients were divided into tremor dominant (TD), non-tremor dominant (NTD) and rapid disease progression (RDP) subgroups. PD patients showed lower wide-waveform adherence (wWFA) (<i>p</i> = 0.025) and interhemispheric connectivity (IHC<sub>CONN</sub>) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to healthy controls. Lower occipital IHC<sub>CONN</sub> correlated with advanced disease stage (<i>r</i> = −0.37, <i>p</i> = 0.0039). The RDP and NTD groups showed lower wWFA in response to occipital stimulation than the TD group (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Occipital TEP measures identified RDP patients with 85% accuracy. These findings demonstrate occipital network involvement in early PD stages, suggesting that TEP measures offer insights into altered networks in PD subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TMS-evoked potentials unveil occipital network involvement in patients diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease within 5 years of inclusion\",\"authors\":\"Noa Zifman, Ofri Levy-Lamdan, Tal Hiller, Avner Thaler, Iftach Dolev, Anat Mirelman, Hilla Fogel, Mark Hallett, Inbal Maidan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41531-024-00793-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Distinguishing Parkinson’s disease (PD) subgroups may be achieved by observing network responses to external stimuli. We compared TMS-evoked potential (TEP) measures from stimulation of bilateral motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and visual cortex (V1) between 62 PD patients (age: 69.9 ± 7.5) and 76 healthy controls (age: 69.2 ± 4.3) using a TMS–EEG protocol. TEP measures were analyzed using two-way ANCOVA adjusted for MOCA. PD patients were divided into tremor dominant (TD), non-tremor dominant (NTD) and rapid disease progression (RDP) subgroups. PD patients showed lower wide-waveform adherence (wWFA) (<i>p</i> = 0.025) and interhemispheric connectivity (IHC<sub>CONN</sub>) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to healthy controls. Lower occipital IHC<sub>CONN</sub> correlated with advanced disease stage (<i>r</i> = −0.37, <i>p</i> = 0.0039). The RDP and NTD groups showed lower wWFA in response to occipital stimulation than the TD group (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Occipital TEP measures identified RDP patients with 85% accuracy. These findings demonstrate occipital network involvement in early PD stages, suggesting that TEP measures offer insights into altered networks in PD subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00793-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-024-00793-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过观察网络对外部刺激的反应可以区分帕金森病(PD)亚群。我们使用 TMS-EEG 方案比较了 62 名帕金森病患者(年龄:69.9 ± 7.5)和 76 名健康对照组(年龄:69.2 ± 4.3)通过刺激双侧运动皮层 (M1)、背外侧前额叶皮层 (DLPFC) 和视觉皮层 (V1) 获得的 TMS 诱发电位 (TEP) 测量结果。采用经 MOCA 调整的双向方差分析对 TEP 测量进行了分析。帕金森病患者被分为震颤显性(TD)、非震颤显性(NTD)和疾病快速进展(RDP)亚组。与健康对照组相比,帕金森病患者的宽波形连贯性(wWFA)(p = 0.025)和半球间连通性(IHCCONN)(p < 0.001)均较低。枕叶 IHCCONN 值较低与疾病晚期相关(r = -0.37,p = 0.0039)。RDP 组和 NTD 组对枕部刺激的 wWFA 反应低于 TD 组(p = 0.005)。枕部 TEP 测量识别 RDP 患者的准确率为 85%。这些研究结果表明,在帕金森病的早期阶段,枕骨网络也参与其中,这表明TEP测量可帮助人们深入了解帕金森病亚组中发生改变的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TMS-evoked potentials unveil occipital network involvement in patients diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease within 5 years of inclusion

Distinguishing Parkinson’s disease (PD) subgroups may be achieved by observing network responses to external stimuli. We compared TMS-evoked potential (TEP) measures from stimulation of bilateral motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and visual cortex (V1) between 62 PD patients (age: 69.9 ± 7.5) and 76 healthy controls (age: 69.2 ± 4.3) using a TMS–EEG protocol. TEP measures were analyzed using two-way ANCOVA adjusted for MOCA. PD patients were divided into tremor dominant (TD), non-tremor dominant (NTD) and rapid disease progression (RDP) subgroups. PD patients showed lower wide-waveform adherence (wWFA) (p = 0.025) and interhemispheric connectivity (IHCCONN) (p < 0.001) compared to healthy controls. Lower occipital IHCCONN correlated with advanced disease stage (r = −0.37, p = 0.0039). The RDP and NTD groups showed lower wWFA in response to occipital stimulation than the TD group (p = 0.005). Occipital TEP measures identified RDP patients with 85% accuracy. These findings demonstrate occipital network involvement in early PD stages, suggesting that TEP measures offer insights into altered networks in PD subgroups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Parkinson's Disease
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
156
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.
期刊最新文献
Awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation targeting the caudal zona incerta for essential tremor Accelerating Parkinson’s Disease drug development with federated learning approaches Push-pull effects of basal ganglia network in Parkinson’s disease inferred by functional MRI A worldwide study of subcortical shape as a marker for clinical staging in Parkinson's disease. Relative sparing of dopaminergic terminals in the caudate nucleus is a feature of rest tremor in Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1