评估手术患者对围手术期隐私的看法。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.115
Burçin Irmak PhD , Nurgül Bölükbaş PhD , Muharrem Çelik BSN, RN , Elif Aslan BSN, RN , Hatice Polat Şimşek BSN, RN , Ömer Seyfi Acar BSN, RN , Ümmühan İrice BSN, RN
{"title":"评估手术患者对围手术期隐私的看法。","authors":"Burçin Irmak PhD ,&nbsp;Nurgül Bölükbaş PhD ,&nbsp;Muharrem Çelik BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Elif Aslan BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Hatice Polat Şimşek BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Ömer Seyfi Acar BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Ümmühan İrice BSN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate surgical patients' perceptions of perioperative privacy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A descriptive and cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 172 patients who underwent surgical intervention at a state hospital were included. A Patient Information Form and the Perioperative Privacy Scale (PPS) were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>With a mean age of 56.81 ± 1.29 years, 56.4% of the patients were male. Over half of all patients (51.7%) were familiar with the concept of patient privacy, and the vast majority (94.2%) felt that their privacy was protected by the health care staff during their hospital stay. The mean PPS score was 74.38 ± 10.44. A statistically significant difference was found between the patients' marital status, education level, health insurance, attention to privacy by health personnel, and the mean scores of the PPS (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The research found that patients who underwent surgery felt that their privacy was well-protected during the perioperative period. To maintain patient privacy during this process, surgical nurses should continue their current practices and emphasize the importance of the subject in in-service training programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":"40 3","pages":"Pages 558-563.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Opinions of Surgery Patients on Perioperative Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Burçin Irmak PhD ,&nbsp;Nurgül Bölükbaş PhD ,&nbsp;Muharrem Çelik BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Elif Aslan BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Hatice Polat Şimşek BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Ömer Seyfi Acar BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Ümmühan İrice BSN, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate surgical patients' perceptions of perioperative privacy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A descriptive and cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 172 patients who underwent surgical intervention at a state hospital were included. A Patient Information Form and the Perioperative Privacy Scale (PPS) were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>With a mean age of 56.81 ± 1.29 years, 56.4% of the patients were male. Over half of all patients (51.7%) were familiar with the concept of patient privacy, and the vast majority (94.2%) felt that their privacy was protected by the health care staff during their hospital stay. The mean PPS score was 74.38 ± 10.44. A statistically significant difference was found between the patients' marital status, education level, health insurance, attention to privacy by health personnel, and the mean scores of the PPS (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The research found that patients who underwent surgery felt that their privacy was well-protected during the perioperative period. To maintain patient privacy during this process, surgical nurses should continue their current practices and emphasize the importance of the subject in in-service training programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 558-563.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089947224003551\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089947224003551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估手术患者对围术期隐私的看法:方法:描述性横断面研究:共纳入 172 名在一家州立医院接受外科手术的患者。采用患者信息表和围手术期隐私量表(PPS)收集数据。数据分析采用描述性统计方法、Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验:平均年龄为(56.81 ± 1.29)岁,56.4%的患者为男性。超过一半的患者(51.7%)熟悉患者隐私的概念,绝大多数患者(94.2%)认为在住院期间医护人员保护了他们的隐私。PPS 平均得分为 74.38 ± 10.44。研究发现,患者的婚姻状况、教育程度、医疗保险、医护人员对隐私的关注程度与 PPS 平均得分之间存在明显的统计学差异(P 结论:PPS 的平均得分与患者的婚姻状况、教育程度、医疗保险、医护人员对隐私的关注程度之间存在明显的统计学差异:研究发现,接受手术的患者认为他们的隐私在围手术期得到了很好的保护。为了在这一过程中维护病人的隐私,外科护士应继续保持目前的做法,并在在职培训课程中强调这一主题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the Opinions of Surgery Patients on Perioperative Privacy

Purpose

To evaluate surgical patients' perceptions of perioperative privacy.

Design

A descriptive and cross-sectional study.

Methods

A total of 172 patients who underwent surgical intervention at a state hospital were included. A Patient Information Form and the Perioperative Privacy Scale (PPS) were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Findings

With a mean age of 56.81 ± 1.29 years, 56.4% of the patients were male. Over half of all patients (51.7%) were familiar with the concept of patient privacy, and the vast majority (94.2%) felt that their privacy was protected by the health care staff during their hospital stay. The mean PPS score was 74.38 ± 10.44. A statistically significant difference was found between the patients' marital status, education level, health insurance, attention to privacy by health personnel, and the mean scores of the PPS (P < .05).

Conclusions

The research found that patients who underwent surgery felt that their privacy was well-protected during the perioperative period. To maintain patient privacy during this process, surgical nurses should continue their current practices and emphasize the importance of the subject in in-service training programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Dexamethasone vs Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Navigating Modern Intravenous Fluid Therapy in Critical Care. Mapping the Research Landscape on Postoperative Hypoxemia: A Bibliometric Analysis (1998 to 2024). Intraoperative Noise Isolation as an Opioid-Sparing Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Enhancing Safety in Pediatric Airway Management: An Integrative Review for Perioperative Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1