专业实践指南:优化手术室和介入部门受控环境区的能效。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Visceral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.08.001
El-Mahdi Hafiani , Stéphane Ortu , Denis Lopez , Florence Lallemant , Valérie Dumaine , Pierre Cassier , Karem Slim , Patrick Pessaux , with the Collectif d’écoresponsabilité en santé (CERES), the Association française de chirurgie (AFC), the Association pour la prévention et l’étude de la contamination (ASPEC), the Société française d’hygiène hospitalière (SF2H), the Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (SFAR), the Société française de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique (SOFCOT)
{"title":"专业实践指南:优化手术室和介入部门受控环境区的能效。","authors":"El-Mahdi Hafiani ,&nbsp;Stéphane Ortu ,&nbsp;Denis Lopez ,&nbsp;Florence Lallemant ,&nbsp;Valérie Dumaine ,&nbsp;Pierre Cassier ,&nbsp;Karem Slim ,&nbsp;Patrick Pessaux ,&nbsp;with the Collectif d’écoresponsabilité en santé (CERES),&nbsp;the Association française de chirurgie (AFC),&nbsp;the Association pour la prévention et l’étude de la contamination (ASPEC),&nbsp;the Société française d’hygiène hospitalière (SF2H),&nbsp;the Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (SFAR),&nbsp;the Société française de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique (SOFCOT)","doi":"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To issue recommendations for reduced energy consumption in controlled environment zones (CEZ) in operating theaters and interventional sectors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A committee bringing together seven experts from the SFAR, AFC, SF2H, ASPEC and SOFCOT was convened by CERES. A conflict-of-interest statement was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout the elaboration of the reference document. The experts received no financing from any company commercializing a healthcare product (medicine or medical device). The committee was called upon to follow and respect the GRADE® (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) method to evaluate quality of the factual data on which the recommendations were based.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed the relevant literature and formulated the recommendations in accordance with the GRADE® methodology by identifying three different fields. Each question was formulated in accordance with the PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, outcome) format.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The experts’ attempts at synthesis and application of the GRADE® method led to 16 recommendations. In cases where GRADE® method could not be applied, the recommendations were formulated as expert advice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Once strong agreement among the experts had been reached, we formulated 15 recommendations for decreased energy consumption and reduced environmental impact in the controlled environment zones of operating theaters and interventional sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","volume":"161 5","pages":"Pages 344-352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional practice guidelines: Optimization of energy efficiency in controlled environment zones in operating theaters and interventional sectors\",\"authors\":\"El-Mahdi Hafiani ,&nbsp;Stéphane Ortu ,&nbsp;Denis Lopez ,&nbsp;Florence Lallemant ,&nbsp;Valérie Dumaine ,&nbsp;Pierre Cassier ,&nbsp;Karem Slim ,&nbsp;Patrick Pessaux ,&nbsp;with the Collectif d’écoresponsabilité en santé (CERES),&nbsp;the Association française de chirurgie (AFC),&nbsp;the Association pour la prévention et l’étude de la contamination (ASPEC),&nbsp;the Société française d’hygiène hospitalière (SF2H),&nbsp;the Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (SFAR),&nbsp;the Société française de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique (SOFCOT)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To issue recommendations for reduced energy consumption in controlled environment zones (CEZ) in operating theaters and interventional sectors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A committee bringing together seven experts from the SFAR, AFC, SF2H, ASPEC and SOFCOT was convened by CERES. A conflict-of-interest statement was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout the elaboration of the reference document. The experts received no financing from any company commercializing a healthcare product (medicine or medical device). The committee was called upon to follow and respect the GRADE® (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) method to evaluate quality of the factual data on which the recommendations were based.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed the relevant literature and formulated the recommendations in accordance with the GRADE® methodology by identifying three different fields. Each question was formulated in accordance with the PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, outcome) format.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The experts’ attempts at synthesis and application of the GRADE® method led to 16 recommendations. In cases where GRADE® method could not be applied, the recommendations were formulated as expert advice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Once strong agreement among the experts had been reached, we formulated 15 recommendations for decreased energy consumption and reduced environmental impact in the controlled environment zones of operating theaters and interventional sectors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Visceral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"161 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 344-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Visceral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878788624001188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878788624001188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:为减少手术室和介入部门受控环境区(CEZ)的能耗提出建议:发布降低手术室和介入部门受控环境区(CEZ)能耗的建议:设计:CERES 组建了一个委员会,汇集了来自 SFAR、AFC、SF2H、ASPEC 和 SOFCOT 的七位专家。委员会在工作开始时就制定了利益冲突声明,并在整个参考文件的制定过程中予以执行。专家们没有从任何保健产品(药品或医疗器械)商业化公司获得资助。委员会被要求遵循并尊重 GRADE®(建议评估、制定和评价分级)方法,以评估建议所依据的事实数据的质量:我们对相关文献进行了分析,并根据 GRADE® 方法确定了三个不同的领域来制定建议。每个问题都是按照 PICO(患者、干预、比较、结果)格式提出的:结果:专家们尝试综合并应用 GRADE® 方法提出了 16 项建议。在无法应用 GRADE® 方法的情况下,专家们提出了建议:结论:在专家们达成一致意见后,我们制定了 15 项建议,以降低手术室和介入部门受控环境区域的能耗,减少对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Professional practice guidelines: Optimization of energy efficiency in controlled environment zones in operating theaters and interventional sectors

Objective

To issue recommendations for reduced energy consumption in controlled environment zones (CEZ) in operating theaters and interventional sectors.

Design

A committee bringing together seven experts from the SFAR, AFC, SF2H, ASPEC and SOFCOT was convened by CERES. A conflict-of-interest statement was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout the elaboration of the reference document. The experts received no financing from any company commercializing a healthcare product (medicine or medical device). The committee was called upon to follow and respect the GRADE® (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) method to evaluate quality of the factual data on which the recommendations were based.

Methods

We analyzed the relevant literature and formulated the recommendations in accordance with the GRADE® methodology by identifying three different fields. Each question was formulated in accordance with the PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, outcome) format.

Results

The experts’ attempts at synthesis and application of the GRADE® method led to 16 recommendations. In cases where GRADE® method could not be applied, the recommendations were formulated as expert advice.

Conclusion

Once strong agreement among the experts had been reached, we formulated 15 recommendations for decreased energy consumption and reduced environmental impact in the controlled environment zones of operating theaters and interventional sectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visceral Surgery (JVS) is the online-only, English version of the French Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale. The journal focuses on clinical research and continuing education, and publishes original and review articles related to general surgery, as well as press reviews of recently published major international works. High-quality illustrations of surgical techniques, images and videos serve as support for clinical evaluation and practice optimization. JVS is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline) and is accessible worldwide through ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey.
期刊最新文献
A new healthcare paradigm: Integration of the environment in value-based health care. EROMs: Environment-related outcome measures. Left hepatectomy extended to segments 1, 5 and 8 with reconstruction of the right branch of the hepatic artery for Rennes type X perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Neuroendocrine tumor arising inside a tailgut cyst. Resuscitative thoracotomy in France: For whom? By whom? Risk factors for local recurrence of rectal cancer after curative surgery: A single-center retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1