局部晚期食管癌倾向匹配研究:手术与术后放疗。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s13014-024-02528-0
Ya Zeng, Xi Su, Tongfang Zhou, Jingyi Jia, Jun Liu, Wen Yu, Qin Zhang, Xinyun Song, Xiaolong Fu, Xuwei Cai
{"title":"局部晚期食管癌倾向匹配研究:手术与术后放疗。","authors":"Ya Zeng, Xi Su, Tongfang Zhou, Jingyi Jia, Jun Liu, Wen Yu, Qin Zhang, Xinyun Song, Xiaolong Fu, Xuwei Cai","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02528-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to delineate the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients managed with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort from two academic centers, encompassing patients who initially underwent esophagectomy and were pathologically staged T3-4, was analyzed. Survival outcomes were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method, with survival significance was evaluated using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance potential selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 506 patients, 251 underwent surgery alone and 255 received radiotherapy following radical surgery. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, PORT significantly improved 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (45.3% vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) compared to surgery alone. These differences in survival outcomes persisted even after PSM (p < 0.001 for both). Treatment failure was significantly less frequent in the PORT group (46.7%) compared to the surgery-only group (90.0%; p < 0.001), with corresponding reductions in locoregional recurrence (9.4% vs. 54.1%; p < 0.001). This underscores the significant association between PORT and disease control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy highlights the importance of PORT in improving survival and reducing recurrence in advanced T3-4 TESCC patients. This study underscores the importance of PORT as a salvage treatment for locally advanced TESCC patients without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propensity-matched study on locally advanced esophageal cancer: surgery versus post-operative radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Ya Zeng, Xi Su, Tongfang Zhou, Jingyi Jia, Jun Liu, Wen Yu, Qin Zhang, Xinyun Song, Xiaolong Fu, Xuwei Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02528-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to delineate the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients managed with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort from two academic centers, encompassing patients who initially underwent esophagectomy and were pathologically staged T3-4, was analyzed. Survival outcomes were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method, with survival significance was evaluated using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance potential selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 506 patients, 251 underwent surgery alone and 255 received radiotherapy following radical surgery. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, PORT significantly improved 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (45.3% vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) compared to surgery alone. These differences in survival outcomes persisted even after PSM (p < 0.001 for both). Treatment failure was significantly less frequent in the PORT group (46.7%) compared to the surgery-only group (90.0%; p < 0.001), with corresponding reductions in locoregional recurrence (9.4% vs. 54.1%; p < 0.001). This underscores the significant association between PORT and disease control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy highlights the importance of PORT in improving survival and reducing recurrence in advanced T3-4 TESCC patients. This study underscores the importance of PORT as a salvage treatment for locally advanced TESCC patients without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02528-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02528-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨局部晚期胸腔食管鳞状细胞癌(TESCC)患者接受或不接受术后放疗(PORT)的长期疗效和复发模式:分析了来自两个学术中心的回顾性队列,其中包括最初接受食管切除术且病理分期为 T3-4 的患者。生存结果采用卡普兰-梅耶法(Kaplan-Meier method)计算,生存意义采用对数秩检验(log-rank test)评估。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)平衡潜在的选择偏差:在506名患者中,251人只接受了手术,255人在根治术后接受了放疗。中位随访时间为 49.1 个月,PORT 能显著提高患者的 5 年总生存率(53.8% 对 25.3%;P 结论:PORT 能显著提高患者的 5 年总生存率:新辅助化放疗的缺失凸显了PORT在提高晚期T3-4 TESCC患者生存率和减少复发方面的重要性。这项研究强调了PORT作为不进行新辅助化放疗的局部晚期TESCC患者挽救治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Propensity-matched study on locally advanced esophageal cancer: surgery versus post-operative radiotherapy.

Background: This study aims to delineate the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients managed with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).

Methods: A retrospective cohort from two academic centers, encompassing patients who initially underwent esophagectomy and were pathologically staged T3-4, was analyzed. Survival outcomes were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method, with survival significance was evaluated using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance potential selection bias.

Results: Among the 506 patients, 251 underwent surgery alone and 255 received radiotherapy following radical surgery. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, PORT significantly improved 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (45.3% vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) compared to surgery alone. These differences in survival outcomes persisted even after PSM (p < 0.001 for both). Treatment failure was significantly less frequent in the PORT group (46.7%) compared to the surgery-only group (90.0%; p < 0.001), with corresponding reductions in locoregional recurrence (9.4% vs. 54.1%; p < 0.001). This underscores the significant association between PORT and disease control.

Conclusion: The absence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy highlights the importance of PORT in improving survival and reducing recurrence in advanced T3-4 TESCC patients. This study underscores the importance of PORT as a salvage treatment for locally advanced TESCC patients without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of radiation-related lymphocyte recovery on the prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective analysis. Correction: Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas. Deep learning-based synthetic CT for dosimetric monitoring of combined conventional radiotherapy and lattice boost in large lung tumors. Correction: The significance of risk stratification through nomogram-based assessment in determining postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with pT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer. Sequential or simultaneous-integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer patients: trade-offs between skin toxicity and risk of compromised coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1