Emily S. Winn-Deen , Laura T. Bortolin , Daniel Gusenleitner , Kelly M. Biette , Karen Copeland , Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj , Sophia Apostolidou , Anthony D. Couvillon , Daniel P. Salem , Sanchari Banerjee , Jonian Grosha , Ibukunoluwapo O. Zabroski , Christopher R. Sedlak , Delaney M. Byrne , Bilal F. Hamzeh , MacKenzie S. King , Lauren T. Cuoco , Peter A. Duff , Brendan J. Manning , Troy B. Hawkins , Usha Menon
{"title":"使用基于细胞外囊泡的新型血液检验提高卵巢癌筛查的特异性--训练和验证队列中的表现。","authors":"Emily S. Winn-Deen , Laura T. Bortolin , Daniel Gusenleitner , Kelly M. Biette , Karen Copeland , Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj , Sophia Apostolidou , Anthony D. Couvillon , Daniel P. Salem , Sanchari Banerjee , Jonian Grosha , Ibukunoluwapo O. Zabroski , Christopher R. Sedlak , Delaney M. Byrne , Bilal F. Hamzeh , MacKenzie S. King , Lauren T. Cuoco , Peter A. Duff , Brendan J. Manning , Troy B. Hawkins , Usha Menon","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The low incidence of ovarian cancer (OC) dictates that any screening strategy needs to be both highly sensitive and highly specific. This study explored the utility of detecting multiple colocalized proteins or glycosylation epitopes on single tumor-associated extracellular vesicles from blood. The novel Mercy Halo Ovarian Cancer Test (OC Test) uses immunoaffinity capture of tumor-associated extracellular vesicles, followed by proximity-ligation real-time quantitative PCR to detect combinations of up to three biomarkers to maximize specificity, and measures multiple combinations to maximize sensitivity. A high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) case-control training set of EDTA plasma samples from 397 women was used to lock down the test design, the data interpretation algorithm, and the cutoff between cancer and noncancer. Performance was verified and compared with cancer antigen 125 in an independent blinded case-control set of serum samples from 390 women (132 controls, 66 HGSC, 83 non-HGSC OC, and 109 benign). In the verification study, the OC Test showed a specificity of 97.0% (128/132; 95% CI, 92.4%–99.6%), a HGSC sensitivity of 97.0% (64/66; 95% CI, 87.8%–99.2%), and an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93–0.99) and detected 73.5% (61/83; 95% CI, 62.7%–82.6%) of the non-HGSC OC cases. This test exhibited fewer false positives in subjects with benign ovarian tumors, nonovarian cancers, and inflammatory conditions when compared with cancer antigen 125. The combined sensitivity and specificity of this new test suggests that it may have potential in OC screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":"26 12","pages":"Pages 1129-1148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Specificity for Ovarian Cancer Screening Using a Novel Extracellular Vesicle–Based Blood Test\",\"authors\":\"Emily S. Winn-Deen , Laura T. Bortolin , Daniel Gusenleitner , Kelly M. Biette , Karen Copeland , Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj , Sophia Apostolidou , Anthony D. Couvillon , Daniel P. Salem , Sanchari Banerjee , Jonian Grosha , Ibukunoluwapo O. Zabroski , Christopher R. Sedlak , Delaney M. Byrne , Bilal F. Hamzeh , MacKenzie S. King , Lauren T. Cuoco , Peter A. Duff , Brendan J. Manning , Troy B. Hawkins , Usha Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The low incidence of ovarian cancer (OC) dictates that any screening strategy needs to be both highly sensitive and highly specific. This study explored the utility of detecting multiple colocalized proteins or glycosylation epitopes on single tumor-associated extracellular vesicles from blood. The novel Mercy Halo Ovarian Cancer Test (OC Test) uses immunoaffinity capture of tumor-associated extracellular vesicles, followed by proximity-ligation real-time quantitative PCR to detect combinations of up to three biomarkers to maximize specificity, and measures multiple combinations to maximize sensitivity. A high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) case-control training set of EDTA plasma samples from 397 women was used to lock down the test design, the data interpretation algorithm, and the cutoff between cancer and noncancer. Performance was verified and compared with cancer antigen 125 in an independent blinded case-control set of serum samples from 390 women (132 controls, 66 HGSC, 83 non-HGSC OC, and 109 benign). In the verification study, the OC Test showed a specificity of 97.0% (128/132; 95% CI, 92.4%–99.6%), a HGSC sensitivity of 97.0% (64/66; 95% CI, 87.8%–99.2%), and an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93–0.99) and detected 73.5% (61/83; 95% CI, 62.7%–82.6%) of the non-HGSC OC cases. This test exhibited fewer false positives in subjects with benign ovarian tumors, nonovarian cancers, and inflammatory conditions when compared with cancer antigen 125. The combined sensitivity and specificity of this new test suggests that it may have potential in OC screening.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"26 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1129-1148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824002083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824002083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving Specificity for Ovarian Cancer Screening Using a Novel Extracellular Vesicle–Based Blood Test
The low incidence of ovarian cancer (OC) dictates that any screening strategy needs to be both highly sensitive and highly specific. This study explored the utility of detecting multiple colocalized proteins or glycosylation epitopes on single tumor-associated extracellular vesicles from blood. The novel Mercy Halo Ovarian Cancer Test (OC Test) uses immunoaffinity capture of tumor-associated extracellular vesicles, followed by proximity-ligation real-time quantitative PCR to detect combinations of up to three biomarkers to maximize specificity, and measures multiple combinations to maximize sensitivity. A high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) case-control training set of EDTA plasma samples from 397 women was used to lock down the test design, the data interpretation algorithm, and the cutoff between cancer and noncancer. Performance was verified and compared with cancer antigen 125 in an independent blinded case-control set of serum samples from 390 women (132 controls, 66 HGSC, 83 non-HGSC OC, and 109 benign). In the verification study, the OC Test showed a specificity of 97.0% (128/132; 95% CI, 92.4%–99.6%), a HGSC sensitivity of 97.0% (64/66; 95% CI, 87.8%–99.2%), and an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93–0.99) and detected 73.5% (61/83; 95% CI, 62.7%–82.6%) of the non-HGSC OC cases. This test exhibited fewer false positives in subjects with benign ovarian tumors, nonovarian cancers, and inflammatory conditions when compared with cancer antigen 125. The combined sensitivity and specificity of this new test suggests that it may have potential in OC screening.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.