风险业务。预防高危患者攻击医务工作者的干预措施:综合评述》(Interventions to Prevent Aggression Against Health Workers From Patients at Risk: An Integrative Review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17433
Teresa McCamon, Vicki Lowe, Rinchu George, Rachel Gordon, Heather Watson
{"title":"风险业务。预防高危患者攻击医务工作者的干预措施:综合评述》(Interventions to Prevent Aggression Against Health Workers From Patients at Risk: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Teresa McCamon, Vicki Lowe, Rinchu George, Rachel Gordon, Heather Watson","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify best practices to prevent violence against healthcare workers by patients at risk for aggression in the adult inpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An integrative review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals Model. Title and abstract screening on 4186 articles resulted in 156 for full text review. Full text screening yielded 14 articles that met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and JBI from January 2019 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review revealed behavioural intervention teams, environmental changes, and coordinated communication plans were the most used strategies, however none demonstrated significant decreases in violence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health systems can implement strategies shown to decrease the incidence of violence in healthcare settings globally. Lack of consistency in the evidence suggests the need for further research to assess mitigating strategies for violence against healthcare workers in inpatient hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Patient safety is a cornerstone of nursing practice; however, healthcare workers need to feel safe in their work environment. Violent events are chronically underreported, ill defined, and when reported, do not address change in the practice setting. Identifying strategies to address escalating behaviour before it results in violence is crucial for everyone's safety.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This integrative review exposes the scarcity of evidence available to address rising concerns about patients on healthcare provider violence (Type II) in the workplace. Although several assessment tools for identifying violent patients exist, evidence regarding prevention is woefully absent. The review highlights potential interventions for further study to equip healthcare workers to manage patients safely and effectively before an escalation occurs.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>PRISMA checklist for integrative reviews.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution was part of this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risky Business. Interventions to Prevent Aggression Against Health Workers From Patients at Risk: An Integrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa McCamon, Vicki Lowe, Rinchu George, Rachel Gordon, Heather Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify best practices to prevent violence against healthcare workers by patients at risk for aggression in the adult inpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An integrative review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals Model. Title and abstract screening on 4186 articles resulted in 156 for full text review. Full text screening yielded 14 articles that met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and JBI from January 2019 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review revealed behavioural intervention teams, environmental changes, and coordinated communication plans were the most used strategies, however none demonstrated significant decreases in violence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health systems can implement strategies shown to decrease the incidence of violence in healthcare settings globally. Lack of consistency in the evidence suggests the need for further research to assess mitigating strategies for violence against healthcare workers in inpatient hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Patient safety is a cornerstone of nursing practice; however, healthcare workers need to feel safe in their work environment. Violent events are chronically underreported, ill defined, and when reported, do not address change in the practice setting. Identifying strategies to address escalating behaviour before it results in violence is crucial for everyone's safety.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This integrative review exposes the scarcity of evidence available to address rising concerns about patients on healthcare provider violence (Type II) in the workplace. Although several assessment tools for identifying violent patients exist, evidence regarding prevention is woefully absent. The review highlights potential interventions for further study to equip healthcare workers to manage patients safely and effectively before an escalation occurs.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>PRISMA checklist for integrative reviews.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution was part of this review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定预防成人住院患者对医护人员施暴的最佳实践:设计:综合回顾:采用约翰霍普金斯大学的护士和医护人员循证实践模式。对 4186 篇文章的标题和摘要进行筛选,最终确定 156 篇文章进行全文综述。全文筛选出 14 篇符合纳入标准的文章:从 2019 年 1 月到 2023 年 2 月,对 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase 和 JBI 等数据库进行了检索:综述显示,行为干预小组、环境改变和协调沟通计划是使用最多的策略,但没有一项策略能显著减少暴力行为:结论:医疗系统可以实施一些策略来减少全球医疗机构中的暴力事件。由于证据缺乏一致性,因此有必要开展进一步研究,以评估在医院住院环境中针对医护人员的暴力行为的缓解策略:患者安全是护理实践的基石;然而,医护人员需要在工作环境中感到安全。暴力事件的报告率长期偏低,定义不清,即使报告了也不能解决实践环境中的变化。在暴力行为发生之前,确定解决行为升级的策略对每个人的安全都至关重要:本综述揭示了现有证据的匮乏,无法解决人们日益关注的工作场所患者对医护人员的暴力行为(第二类)问题。虽然有几种评估工具可用于识别暴力患者,但有关预防的证据却非常缺乏。本综述强调了有待进一步研究的潜在干预措施,以帮助医护人员在暴力升级之前安全有效地管理病人:报告方法:PRISMA综合综述核对表:本综述无患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risky Business. Interventions to Prevent Aggression Against Health Workers From Patients at Risk: An Integrative Review.

Aim: To identify best practices to prevent violence against healthcare workers by patients at risk for aggression in the adult inpatient setting.

Design: An integrative review.

Methods: Conducted using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice for Nurses and Healthcare Professionals Model. Title and abstract screening on 4186 articles resulted in 156 for full text review. Full text screening yielded 14 articles that met inclusion criteria.

Data sources: A search of the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and JBI from January 2019 to February 2023.

Results: The review revealed behavioural intervention teams, environmental changes, and coordinated communication plans were the most used strategies, however none demonstrated significant decreases in violence.

Conclusions: Health systems can implement strategies shown to decrease the incidence of violence in healthcare settings globally. Lack of consistency in the evidence suggests the need for further research to assess mitigating strategies for violence against healthcare workers in inpatient hospital settings.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Patient safety is a cornerstone of nursing practice; however, healthcare workers need to feel safe in their work environment. Violent events are chronically underreported, ill defined, and when reported, do not address change in the practice setting. Identifying strategies to address escalating behaviour before it results in violence is crucial for everyone's safety.

Impact: This integrative review exposes the scarcity of evidence available to address rising concerns about patients on healthcare provider violence (Type II) in the workplace. Although several assessment tools for identifying violent patients exist, evidence regarding prevention is woefully absent. The review highlights potential interventions for further study to equip healthcare workers to manage patients safely and effectively before an escalation occurs.

Reporting method: PRISMA checklist for integrative reviews.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution was part of this review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'. "But what do you really think?" Nurses' contrasting explicit and implicit attitudes towards people with disabilities using the implicit association test. Nursing standards, language and age as variables associated with clinical competence for nurses in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study. Factors related to nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia. Factors related to preoperative anxiety in older patients with sensory impairment: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1