急诊科与初级保健之间的护理过渡:综合系统回顾。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17434
Kathleen Hain, Jennie M Scarvell, Catherine Paterson
{"title":"急诊科与初级保健之间的护理过渡:综合系统回顾。","authors":"Kathleen Hain, Jennie M Scarvell, Catherine Paterson","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the barriers and enablers of effective transitions of care between the emergency department and primary care providers.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful patient care transitions from the emergency department to primary care providers are important because this process has implications for the quality, patient safety, and cost of patient care. Failure in follow-up consultations with primary care can result in representations to the emergency department, which can impact negative emergency department operational issues throughout the entire hospital.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>An integrative systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The reviewers followed a systematic review protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316165). A search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health databases. Articles were assessed using a predetermined eligibility criterion. Quality assessment and a narrative synthesis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1200 articles screened, 25 studies were included. Four additional articles were identified from reference lists. The range of study designs included: four qualitative, three mixed methods and 22 quantitative studies. A total of 291,012 patients were represented. Successful care transition was enhanced by access to insurance, ease of payment methods, effective communication, prior booked primary care provider appointments and access to transportation. Many patients experienced financial toxicity, and the shortfall between fees charged and rebates provided was found to influence primary care provider follow-up compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future recommendations to provide safe and effective transitions of care would be to optimise supported self-management for patients and deliver timely and clear communication with standardised discharge documentation to be shared between the emergency department and primary care providers.</p><p><strong>Relevance for clinical practice: </strong>There is no one-size-fits-all approach to delivering safe care transitions between emergency department and primary care providers, and future research should target high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero: CRD42022316165.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Transition of Care Between Emergency Department and Primary Care: An Integrative Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Hain, Jennie M Scarvell, Catherine Paterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the barriers and enablers of effective transitions of care between the emergency department and primary care providers.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful patient care transitions from the emergency department to primary care providers are important because this process has implications for the quality, patient safety, and cost of patient care. Failure in follow-up consultations with primary care can result in representations to the emergency department, which can impact negative emergency department operational issues throughout the entire hospital.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>An integrative systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The reviewers followed a systematic review protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316165). A search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health databases. Articles were assessed using a predetermined eligibility criterion. Quality assessment and a narrative synthesis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1200 articles screened, 25 studies were included. Four additional articles were identified from reference lists. The range of study designs included: four qualitative, three mixed methods and 22 quantitative studies. A total of 291,012 patients were represented. Successful care transition was enhanced by access to insurance, ease of payment methods, effective communication, prior booked primary care provider appointments and access to transportation. Many patients experienced financial toxicity, and the shortfall between fees charged and rebates provided was found to influence primary care provider follow-up compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future recommendations to provide safe and effective transitions of care would be to optimise supported self-management for patients and deliver timely and clear communication with standardised discharge documentation to be shared between the emergency department and primary care providers.</p><p><strong>Relevance for clinical practice: </strong>There is no one-size-fits-all approach to delivering safe care transitions between emergency department and primary care providers, and future research should target high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero: CRD42022316165.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17434\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在急诊科和初级医疗服务提供者之间进行有效护理过渡的障碍和促进因素:背景:从急诊科到初级医疗服务提供者之间成功的病人护理过渡非常重要,因为这一过程对病人护理的质量、病人安全和成本都有影响。与初级医疗机构的后续会诊失败可能会导致急诊科的复诊,这可能会对整个医院急诊科的运营问题产生负面影响:根据 PRISMA 指南报告了一篇综合性系统综述。综述者遵循在 PROSPERO(CRD42022316165)注册的系统综述协议。采用检索策略从纳入的数据库中提取文章:CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Scopus、ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health 数据库。采用预先确定的资格标准对文章进行评估。进行了质量评估和叙述性综合:在筛选出的 1200 篇文章中,共纳入了 25 项研究。从参考文献列表中还发现了另外 4 篇文章。研究设计的范围包括:4 项定性研究、3 项混合方法研究和 22 项定量研究。共有 291012 名患者参与了研究。获得保险、方便的支付方式、有效的沟通、提前预约初级保健提供者以及交通便利都有助于成功完成护理过渡。许多患者经历了经济上的痛苦,收费与提供的回扣之间的差额被发现会影响初级保健提供者的随访依从性:结论:为提供安全、有效的护理过渡,今后的建议是优化患者的自我管理,并通过急诊科和初级保健提供者之间共享的标准化出院文件进行及时、清晰的沟通:在急诊科和初级医疗服务提供者之间进行安全的护理过渡没有放之四海而皆准的方法,未来的研究应以高风险群体为目标:试验注册:Prospero:CRD42022316165。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Transition of Care Between Emergency Department and Primary Care: An Integrative Systematic Review.

Aims: To identify the barriers and enablers of effective transitions of care between the emergency department and primary care providers.

Background: Successful patient care transitions from the emergency department to primary care providers are important because this process has implications for the quality, patient safety, and cost of patient care. Failure in follow-up consultations with primary care can result in representations to the emergency department, which can impact negative emergency department operational issues throughout the entire hospital.

Design and methods: An integrative systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The reviewers followed a systematic review protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316165). A search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health databases. Articles were assessed using a predetermined eligibility criterion. Quality assessment and a narrative synthesis were conducted.

Results: Of the 1200 articles screened, 25 studies were included. Four additional articles were identified from reference lists. The range of study designs included: four qualitative, three mixed methods and 22 quantitative studies. A total of 291,012 patients were represented. Successful care transition was enhanced by access to insurance, ease of payment methods, effective communication, prior booked primary care provider appointments and access to transportation. Many patients experienced financial toxicity, and the shortfall between fees charged and rebates provided was found to influence primary care provider follow-up compliance.

Conclusion: Future recommendations to provide safe and effective transitions of care would be to optimise supported self-management for patients and deliver timely and clear communication with standardised discharge documentation to be shared between the emergency department and primary care providers.

Relevance for clinical practice: There is no one-size-fits-all approach to delivering safe care transitions between emergency department and primary care providers, and future research should target high-risk groups.

Trial registration: Prospero: CRD42022316165.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
'Towards a conceptualization of nurses' support of hospitalised patients' self-management-A modified Delphi study'. "But what do you really think?" Nurses' contrasting explicit and implicit attitudes towards people with disabilities using the implicit association test. Nursing standards, language and age as variables associated with clinical competence for nurses in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional study. Factors related to nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia. Factors related to preoperative anxiety in older patients with sensory impairment: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1