西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白内障手术过程中角膜内皮细胞的损失

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001128
Rafael Heinz Montoya, Luis Edmundo Vasquez, Christian Lee, Saxon Hancock, Ahmad Kheirkhah
{"title":"西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白内障手术过程中角膜内皮细胞的损失","authors":"Rafael Heinz Montoya, Luis Edmundo Vasquez, Christian Lee, Saxon Hancock, Ahmad Kheirkhah","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Limited information exists on the possible effects of ethnicity on corneal endothelial cell parameters and their changes during cataract surgery. Thus, we evaluated corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) during surgery for senile cataract in Hispanic and non-Hispanic White adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 312 eyes of 227 patients ≥50 years who underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation for senile cataract. Preoperatively and 1 to 2 months after surgery, specular microscopy was performed to measure ECD, coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonal cell percentage (HEX). Regression analysis was used to compare baseline values as well as surgery-related changes in corneal endothelial cell parameters between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients considering demographics, biometric parameters, and intraoperative cumulative dissipated energy (CDE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 109 Hispanics and 118 non-Hispanics. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was significantly lower in Hispanics (3.12±0.36 mm) compared with non-Hispanics (3.25±0.37 mm, P =0.009). There were no significant differences in baseline ECD between Hispanics (2,547±365 cells/mm 2 ) and non-Hispanics (2,483±380 cells/mm 2 , P =0.17). There were also no significant differences in ECL (16.8%±17.0% vs. 17.4%±18.1%, P =0.46), increase in CV (3.8%±20.7% vs. 1.5%±21.6%, P =0.51), and decrease in HEX (-2.7%±8.5% vs. -1.8%±7.0%, P =0.33) between these two groups. Regression analysis showed that ECL was associated with a shallower ACD ( P =0.003), a higher CDE ( P <0.001), but not with ethnicity ( P =0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are no significant differences in ECD and ECL between Hispanics and non-Hispanics undergoing cataract surgery. Although Hispanics have a shallower ACD, the ethnic difference seems to be clinically insignificant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"489-493"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss During Uneventful Cataract Surgery in Hispanics Versus Non-Hispanics.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Heinz Montoya, Luis Edmundo Vasquez, Christian Lee, Saxon Hancock, Ahmad Kheirkhah\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Limited information exists on the possible effects of ethnicity on corneal endothelial cell parameters and their changes during cataract surgery. Thus, we evaluated corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) during surgery for senile cataract in Hispanic and non-Hispanic White adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 312 eyes of 227 patients ≥50 years who underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation for senile cataract. Preoperatively and 1 to 2 months after surgery, specular microscopy was performed to measure ECD, coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonal cell percentage (HEX). Regression analysis was used to compare baseline values as well as surgery-related changes in corneal endothelial cell parameters between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients considering demographics, biometric parameters, and intraoperative cumulative dissipated energy (CDE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 109 Hispanics and 118 non-Hispanics. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was significantly lower in Hispanics (3.12±0.36 mm) compared with non-Hispanics (3.25±0.37 mm, P =0.009). There were no significant differences in baseline ECD between Hispanics (2,547±365 cells/mm 2 ) and non-Hispanics (2,483±380 cells/mm 2 , P =0.17). There were also no significant differences in ECL (16.8%±17.0% vs. 17.4%±18.1%, P =0.46), increase in CV (3.8%±20.7% vs. 1.5%±21.6%, P =0.51), and decrease in HEX (-2.7%±8.5% vs. -1.8%±7.0%, P =0.33) between these two groups. Regression analysis showed that ECL was associated with a shallower ACD ( P =0.003), a higher CDE ( P <0.001), but not with ethnicity ( P =0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are no significant differences in ECD and ECL between Hispanics and non-Hispanics undergoing cataract surgery. Although Hispanics have a shallower ACD, the ethnic difference seems to be clinically insignificant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"489-493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于种族对角膜内皮细胞参数及其在白内障手术过程中的变化可能产生的影响的信息十分有限。因此,我们评估了西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人成年人在老年性白内障手术期间的角膜内皮细胞密度(ECD)和内皮细胞损失(ECL):这项回顾性研究纳入了 227 名年龄≥50 岁、因老年性白内障接受超声乳化术和眼内人工晶体植入术的患者的 312 只眼睛。在术前和术后 1 到 2 个月,通过镜检测量 ECD、变异系数 (CV) 和六角形细胞百分比 (HEX)。使用回归分析比较西班牙裔和非西班牙裔患者角膜内皮细胞参数的基线值和手术相关变化,同时考虑人口统计学、生物测量参数和术中累积耗散能量(CDE):结果:共有 109 名西班牙裔患者和 118 名非西班牙裔患者。与非西班牙裔(3.25±0.37 mm,P=0.009)相比,西班牙裔的前房深度(ACD)明显较低(3.12±0.36 mm)。西班牙裔(2,547±365 个细胞/平方毫米)和非西班牙裔(2,483±380 个细胞/平方毫米,P=0.17)的基线 ECD 没有明显差异。两组之间在ECL(16.8%±17.0% vs. 17.4%±18.1%,P=0.46)、CV增加(3.8%±20.7% vs. 1.5%±21.6%,P=0.51)和HEX减少(-2.7%±8.5% vs. -1.8%±7.0%, P=0.33)方面也无明显差异。回归分析表明,ECL 与较浅的 ACD(P=0.003)、较高的 CDE(PConclusion:接受白内障手术的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔在 ECD 和 ECL 方面没有明显差异。虽然西班牙裔的 ACD 较浅,但种族差异在临床上似乎并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss During Uneventful Cataract Surgery in Hispanics Versus Non-Hispanics.

Purpose: Limited information exists on the possible effects of ethnicity on corneal endothelial cell parameters and their changes during cataract surgery. Thus, we evaluated corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) during surgery for senile cataract in Hispanic and non-Hispanic White adults.

Methods: This retrospective study included 312 eyes of 227 patients ≥50 years who underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation for senile cataract. Preoperatively and 1 to 2 months after surgery, specular microscopy was performed to measure ECD, coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonal cell percentage (HEX). Regression analysis was used to compare baseline values as well as surgery-related changes in corneal endothelial cell parameters between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients considering demographics, biometric parameters, and intraoperative cumulative dissipated energy (CDE).

Results: There were 109 Hispanics and 118 non-Hispanics. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was significantly lower in Hispanics (3.12±0.36 mm) compared with non-Hispanics (3.25±0.37 mm, P =0.009). There were no significant differences in baseline ECD between Hispanics (2,547±365 cells/mm 2 ) and non-Hispanics (2,483±380 cells/mm 2 , P =0.17). There were also no significant differences in ECL (16.8%±17.0% vs. 17.4%±18.1%, P =0.46), increase in CV (3.8%±20.7% vs. 1.5%±21.6%, P =0.51), and decrease in HEX (-2.7%±8.5% vs. -1.8%±7.0%, P =0.33) between these two groups. Regression analysis showed that ECL was associated with a shallower ACD ( P =0.003), a higher CDE ( P <0.001), but not with ethnicity ( P =0.46).

Conclusion: There are no significant differences in ECD and ECL between Hispanics and non-Hispanics undergoing cataract surgery. Although Hispanics have a shallower ACD, the ethnic difference seems to be clinically insignificant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
期刊最新文献
Contact Lens Regulation: Where Have We Been, Where are We Going? Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients With History of Orthokeratology. Evaluation of Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Glue Application Outcomes in Corneal Thinning and Perforation. Spotlight on Amniotic Membrane Extract Eye Drops: A Review of the Literature. Corneal Clarity and Tomographic Patterns in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome: A Severity-Based Investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1