Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba , Alexandros Páris de Mesquita Ipácio , David Abraham Batista da Hora , Christian Ken Fukunaga , Maria Tereza Camarotti , Arthur Parke Costa Corvelo , André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira M.D
{"title":"接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者在 DAPT ≤ 1 个月后接受替卡格雷单药治疗与继续 DAPT 治疗的对比:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba , Alexandros Páris de Mesquita Ipácio , David Abraham Batista da Hora , Christian Ken Fukunaga , Maria Tereza Camarotti , Arthur Parke Costa Corvelo , André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira M.D","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1–2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33–0,59; <em>p</em> < 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29–0.83; <em>p</em> = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":"49 12","pages":"Article 102868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤ 1-month DAPT vs continued DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba , Alexandros Páris de Mesquita Ipácio , David Abraham Batista da Hora , Christian Ken Fukunaga , Maria Tereza Camarotti , Arthur Parke Costa Corvelo , André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira M.D\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1–2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33–0,59; <em>p</em> < 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29–0.83; <em>p</em> = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"49 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 102868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280624005036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280624005036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤ 1-month DAPT vs continued DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background
Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1–2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7.
Results
Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33–0,59; p < 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29–0.83; p = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.
期刊介绍:
Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.