接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者在 DAPT ≤ 1 个月后接受替卡格雷单药治疗与继续 DAPT 治疗的对比:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Problems in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102868
Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba , Alexandros Páris de Mesquita Ipácio , David Abraham Batista da Hora , Christian Ken Fukunaga , Maria Tereza Camarotti , Arthur Parke Costa Corvelo , André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira M.D
{"title":"接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者在 DAPT ≤ 1 个月后接受替卡格雷单药治疗与继续 DAPT 治疗的对比:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba ,&nbsp;Alexandros Páris de Mesquita Ipácio ,&nbsp;David Abraham Batista da Hora ,&nbsp;Christian Ken Fukunaga ,&nbsp;Maria Tereza Camarotti ,&nbsp;Arthur Parke Costa Corvelo ,&nbsp;André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira M.D","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1–2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33–0,59; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29–0.83; <em>p</em> = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":"49 12","pages":"Article 102868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤ 1-month DAPT vs continued DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Elizabet Taylor Pimenta Weba ,&nbsp;Alexandros Páris de Mesquita Ipácio ,&nbsp;David Abraham Batista da Hora ,&nbsp;Christian Ken Fukunaga ,&nbsp;Maria Tereza Camarotti ,&nbsp;Arthur Parke Costa Corvelo ,&nbsp;André Luiz Carvalho Ferreira M.D\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1–2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33–0,59; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29–0.83; <em>p</em> = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"49 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 102868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280624005036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280624005036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现行指南建议经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后至少使用 12 个月的双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)。然而,长期使用 DAPT 可能会增加出血并发症的风险。因此,我们旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以评估在PCI术后急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者DAPT≤1个月后,与继续使用DATP相比,替卡格雷单药治疗是否能改善临床预后:我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中截至2024年8月发表的随机对照试验。对全因和心血管死亡、总体和主要出血事件、心肌梗死(MI)、中风、靶血管血运重建(TVR)以及术后 1-2 年内的支架血栓进行了评估。统计分析使用Review Manager 5.1.7进行:共纳入三项研究和 13737 名患者,其中 6861 人(49.95%)接受了单药替卡格雷治疗。与DAPT相比,替卡格雷单药治疗可显著降低总体(2.0% vs 4.5%;RR 0.44;95 % Cl 0.33-0.59;p < 0.00001)和大出血(1.4% vs 2.5%;RR 0.49;95 % Cl 0.29-0.83;p = 0.04)风险。两种抗血小板疗法的死亡率、心肌梗死、中风、TVR或支架血栓形成率相似:这项荟萃分析表明,与传统的 12 个月 DAPT 相比,ACS 患者在 PCI 后 DAPT ≤1 个月后单用替卡格雷可减少出血并发症,但不会增加主要不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤ 1-month DAPT vs continued DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Current guidelines recommend at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, DAPT prolonged use may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to assess whether ticagrelor monotherapy after ≤1 month of DAPT improves clinical outcomes compared with continued DATP in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients post-PCI.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 2024. All-cause and cardiovascular death, overall and major bleeding events, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis within 1–2 years post-procedure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.7.

Results

Three studies and 13,737 patients were included, of whom 6861 (49.95 %) received ticagrelor alone. When compared with DAPT, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of overall (2.0 % vs 4.5 %; RR 0.44; 95 % Cl 0.33–0,59; p < 0.00001) and major (1.4 % vs 2.5 %; RR 0.49; 95 % Cl 0.29–0.83; p = 0.04) bleeding events. Both antiplatelet regimens had similar rates of mortality, MI, stroke, TVR or stent thrombosis.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor alone after ≤1 month of DAPT post-PCI in ACS patients reduces bleeding complications without increasing major adverse events compared with traditional DAPT for 12 months.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cardiology
Current Problems in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
392
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in high-risk patients. Insights from a third-world country. "Linking Psoriasis to Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from "Association between psoriasis and atrial fibrillation: A Systematic review and meta-analysis": Psoriasis and AF. Advancements, challenges, and innovative strategies in cardiac rehabilitation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review. Long-term prognosis of elderly patients undergoing atrial septal defect closure: are we acting too late? The Enigmatic Role of SIRT2 in the Cardiovascular System: Deciphering its Protective and Detrimental Actions to Unlock New Avenues for Therapeutic Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1