为监管和卫生技术评估 (HTA) 决策制定加拿大真实世界证据报告指南。

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111545
Mina Tadrous , Theresa Aves , Christine Fahim , Jessica Riad , Nicole Mittmann , Daniel Prieto-Alhambra , Donna R. Rivera , Kelvin Chan , Lisa M. Lix , Seamus Kent , Dalia Dawoud , Jason Robert Guertin , James Ted McDonald , Jeff Round , Scott Klarenbach , Sanja Stanojevic , Mary A. De Vera , Erin Strumpf , Robert W. Platt , Farah Husein , Kaleen N. Hayes
{"title":"为监管和卫生技术评估 (HTA) 决策制定加拿大真实世界证据报告指南。","authors":"Mina Tadrous ,&nbsp;Theresa Aves ,&nbsp;Christine Fahim ,&nbsp;Jessica Riad ,&nbsp;Nicole Mittmann ,&nbsp;Daniel Prieto-Alhambra ,&nbsp;Donna R. Rivera ,&nbsp;Kelvin Chan ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Lix ,&nbsp;Seamus Kent ,&nbsp;Dalia Dawoud ,&nbsp;Jason Robert Guertin ,&nbsp;James Ted McDonald ,&nbsp;Jeff Round ,&nbsp;Scott Klarenbach ,&nbsp;Sanja Stanojevic ,&nbsp;Mary A. De Vera ,&nbsp;Erin Strumpf ,&nbsp;Robert W. Platt ,&nbsp;Farah Husein ,&nbsp;Kaleen N. Hayes","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Real-world evidence (RWE) can complement and fill knowledge gaps from randomized controlled trials to assist in health-technology assessment (HTA) for regulatory decision-making. However, the generation of RWE is an intricate process with many sequential decision points, and different methods and approaches may impact the quality and reliability of evidence. Standardization and transparency in reporting these decisions is imperative to appraise RWE and incorporate it into HTA decision-making. A partnership between Canadian health system stakeholders, namely, Health Canada and Canada’s Drug Agency (formerly the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), was established to develop guidance for the standardization of reporting of RWE for regulatory and HTA decision-making in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>A collaborative initiative to create structured guidance for RWE reporting in the context of regulatory and HTA decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The developed guidance aims to standardize and ensure transparent reporting of RWE to improve its reliability and usefulness in regulatory and HTA processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This guidance can be adapted for other jurisdictions and will have future extensions to incorporate emerging issues with RWE and HTA decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 111545"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Canadian Guidance for reporting real-world evidence for regulatory and health-technology assessment (HTA) decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Mina Tadrous ,&nbsp;Theresa Aves ,&nbsp;Christine Fahim ,&nbsp;Jessica Riad ,&nbsp;Nicole Mittmann ,&nbsp;Daniel Prieto-Alhambra ,&nbsp;Donna R. Rivera ,&nbsp;Kelvin Chan ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Lix ,&nbsp;Seamus Kent ,&nbsp;Dalia Dawoud ,&nbsp;Jason Robert Guertin ,&nbsp;James Ted McDonald ,&nbsp;Jeff Round ,&nbsp;Scott Klarenbach ,&nbsp;Sanja Stanojevic ,&nbsp;Mary A. De Vera ,&nbsp;Erin Strumpf ,&nbsp;Robert W. Platt ,&nbsp;Farah Husein ,&nbsp;Kaleen N. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Real-world evidence (RWE) can complement and fill knowledge gaps from randomized controlled trials to assist in health-technology assessment (HTA) for regulatory decision-making. However, the generation of RWE is an intricate process with many sequential decision points, and different methods and approaches may impact the quality and reliability of evidence. Standardization and transparency in reporting these decisions is imperative to appraise RWE and incorporate it into HTA decision-making. A partnership between Canadian health system stakeholders, namely, Health Canada and Canada’s Drug Agency (formerly the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), was established to develop guidance for the standardization of reporting of RWE for regulatory and HTA decision-making in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>A collaborative initiative to create structured guidance for RWE reporting in the context of regulatory and HTA decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The developed guidance aims to standardize and ensure transparent reporting of RWE to improve its reliability and usefulness in regulatory and HTA processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This guidance can be adapted for other jurisdictions and will have future extensions to incorporate emerging issues with RWE and HTA decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624003019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624003019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

真实世界证据(RWE)可以补充和填补随机对照试验的知识空白,从而协助卫生技术评估(HTA)的监管决策。然而,真实世界证据的生成是一个复杂的过程,有许多连续的决策点,不同的方法和途径可能会影响证据的质量和可靠性。要评估 RWE 并将其纳入 HTA 决策,就必须实现这些决策报告的标准化和透明化。加拿大卫生系统的利益相关者,即加拿大卫生部和加拿大药品局(前身为加拿大药品和卫生技术局 (CADTH))建立了合作关系,共同为加拿大监管和 HTA 决策制定 RWE 报告标准化指南。在本文中,我们介绍了为加拿大监管和 HTA 决策制定真实世界证据报告指南文件和真实世界证据报告核对表的方法。该指南可适用于其他司法管辖区,未来还将扩展,以纳入真实世界证据和 HTA 决策中新出现的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a Canadian Guidance for reporting real-world evidence for regulatory and health-technology assessment (HTA) decision-making

Background and Objective

Real-world evidence (RWE) can complement and fill knowledge gaps from randomized controlled trials to assist in health-technology assessment (HTA) for regulatory decision-making. However, the generation of RWE is an intricate process with many sequential decision points, and different methods and approaches may impact the quality and reliability of evidence. Standardization and transparency in reporting these decisions is imperative to appraise RWE and incorporate it into HTA decision-making. A partnership between Canadian health system stakeholders, namely, Health Canada and Canada’s Drug Agency (formerly the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), was established to develop guidance for the standardization of reporting of RWE for regulatory and HTA decision-making in Canada.

Study Design and Setting

A collaborative initiative to create structured guidance for RWE reporting in the context of regulatory and HTA decision-making.

Results

The developed guidance aims to standardize and ensure transparent reporting of RWE to improve its reliability and usefulness in regulatory and HTA processes.

Conclusion

This guidance can be adapted for other jurisdictions and will have future extensions to incorporate emerging issues with RWE and HTA decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
期刊最新文献
Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: Rapid scoping review and content analysis. Corrigendum to 'Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of cochrane review searches' [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 149 (2022) 83-88]. A methodological review identified several options for utilizing registries for randomized controlled trials. Real-time Adaptive Randomization of Clinical Trials. Some superiority trials with non-significant results published in high impact factor journals correspond to non-inferiority situations: a research-on-research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1