Mina Tadrous , Theresa Aves , Christine Fahim , Jessica Riad , Nicole Mittmann , Daniel Prieto-Alhambra , Donna R. Rivera , Kelvin Chan , Lisa M. Lix , Seamus Kent , Dalia Dawoud , Jason Robert Guertin , James Ted McDonald , Jeff Round , Scott Klarenbach , Sanja Stanojevic , Mary A. De Vera , Erin Strumpf , Robert W. Platt , Farah Husein , Kaleen N. Hayes
{"title":"为监管和卫生技术评估 (HTA) 决策制定加拿大真实世界证据报告指南。","authors":"Mina Tadrous , Theresa Aves , Christine Fahim , Jessica Riad , Nicole Mittmann , Daniel Prieto-Alhambra , Donna R. Rivera , Kelvin Chan , Lisa M. Lix , Seamus Kent , Dalia Dawoud , Jason Robert Guertin , James Ted McDonald , Jeff Round , Scott Klarenbach , Sanja Stanojevic , Mary A. De Vera , Erin Strumpf , Robert W. Platt , Farah Husein , Kaleen N. Hayes","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Real-world evidence (RWE) can complement and fill knowledge gaps from randomized controlled trials to assist in health-technology assessment (HTA) for regulatory decision-making. However, the generation of RWE is an intricate process with many sequential decision points, and different methods and approaches may impact the quality and reliability of evidence. Standardization and transparency in reporting these decisions is imperative to appraise RWE and incorporate it into HTA decision-making. A partnership between Canadian health system stakeholders, namely, Health Canada and Canada’s Drug Agency (formerly the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), was established to develop guidance for the standardization of reporting of RWE for regulatory and HTA decision-making in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>A collaborative initiative to create structured guidance for RWE reporting in the context of regulatory and HTA decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The developed guidance aims to standardize and ensure transparent reporting of RWE to improve its reliability and usefulness in regulatory and HTA processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This guidance can be adapted for other jurisdictions and will have future extensions to incorporate emerging issues with RWE and HTA decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 111545"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Canadian Guidance for reporting real-world evidence for regulatory and health-technology assessment (HTA) decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Mina Tadrous , Theresa Aves , Christine Fahim , Jessica Riad , Nicole Mittmann , Daniel Prieto-Alhambra , Donna R. Rivera , Kelvin Chan , Lisa M. Lix , Seamus Kent , Dalia Dawoud , Jason Robert Guertin , James Ted McDonald , Jeff Round , Scott Klarenbach , Sanja Stanojevic , Mary A. De Vera , Erin Strumpf , Robert W. Platt , Farah Husein , Kaleen N. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Real-world evidence (RWE) can complement and fill knowledge gaps from randomized controlled trials to assist in health-technology assessment (HTA) for regulatory decision-making. However, the generation of RWE is an intricate process with many sequential decision points, and different methods and approaches may impact the quality and reliability of evidence. Standardization and transparency in reporting these decisions is imperative to appraise RWE and incorporate it into HTA decision-making. A partnership between Canadian health system stakeholders, namely, Health Canada and Canada’s Drug Agency (formerly the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), was established to develop guidance for the standardization of reporting of RWE for regulatory and HTA decision-making in Canada.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>A collaborative initiative to create structured guidance for RWE reporting in the context of regulatory and HTA decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The developed guidance aims to standardize and ensure transparent reporting of RWE to improve its reliability and usefulness in regulatory and HTA processes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This guidance can be adapted for other jurisdictions and will have future extensions to incorporate emerging issues with RWE and HTA decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624003019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624003019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a Canadian Guidance for reporting real-world evidence for regulatory and health-technology assessment (HTA) decision-making
Background and Objective
Real-world evidence (RWE) can complement and fill knowledge gaps from randomized controlled trials to assist in health-technology assessment (HTA) for regulatory decision-making. However, the generation of RWE is an intricate process with many sequential decision points, and different methods and approaches may impact the quality and reliability of evidence. Standardization and transparency in reporting these decisions is imperative to appraise RWE and incorporate it into HTA decision-making. A partnership between Canadian health system stakeholders, namely, Health Canada and Canada’s Drug Agency (formerly the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health), was established to develop guidance for the standardization of reporting of RWE for regulatory and HTA decision-making in Canada.
Study Design and Setting
A collaborative initiative to create structured guidance for RWE reporting in the context of regulatory and HTA decision-making.
Results
The developed guidance aims to standardize and ensure transparent reporting of RWE to improve its reliability and usefulness in regulatory and HTA processes.
Conclusion
This guidance can be adapted for other jurisdictions and will have future extensions to incorporate emerging issues with RWE and HTA decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.