当患者可以访问护理文件内容时,如何应对护理文件的复杂性:定性研究。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/jan.16502
Birgitte Lerbæk, Kathrine Hoffmann Kusk, Lone Jørgensen, Britt Laugesen
{"title":"当患者可以访问护理文件内容时,如何应对护理文件的复杂性:定性研究。","authors":"Birgitte Lerbæk, Kathrine Hoffmann Kusk, Lone Jørgensen, Britt Laugesen","doi":"10.1111/jan.16502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how Danish registered nurses (RNs) in hospitals experience documenting nursing care in electronic patient records when the content is accessible to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a qualitative research design, data were generated in six focus groups conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, comprising 31 RNs employed in inpatient wards at a university hospital in Denmark. Subsequently, qualitative content analysis was applied to the gathered data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings include three themes: (1) weighing one's words, (2) building trust or triggering conflicts and (3) risking loss of knowledge. Together, these three themes illustrate the complexities that RNs navigate when patients have access to the content of nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' access to nursing documentation requires RNs to navigate a complex interplay of factors, including awareness of language-use, influence on the nurse-patient-relative relationships, and the risk of losing essential knowledge. Therefore, although patients' access to nursing documentation can induce a positive change in terms of strengthening the professional focus on documentation, it can also result in changes in documentation practices in ways that may compromise nursing documentation as a working tool.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>The findings emphasize an urgent need to explore and discuss how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way when patients have access to the documentation. Furthermore, to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts with patients, it is essential to focus on and prioritize patient involvement in nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>RNs navigate complex practices when patients have direct online access to nursing documentation content. It is crucial to clarify which content nursing documentation should entail and how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way.</p><p><strong>Reporting: </strong>The COREQ checklist was used for reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the Complexities of Nursing Documentation When Patients Have Access to the Content: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Birgitte Lerbæk, Kathrine Hoffmann Kusk, Lone Jørgensen, Britt Laugesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how Danish registered nurses (RNs) in hospitals experience documenting nursing care in electronic patient records when the content is accessible to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a qualitative research design, data were generated in six focus groups conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, comprising 31 RNs employed in inpatient wards at a university hospital in Denmark. Subsequently, qualitative content analysis was applied to the gathered data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings include three themes: (1) weighing one's words, (2) building trust or triggering conflicts and (3) risking loss of knowledge. Together, these three themes illustrate the complexities that RNs navigate when patients have access to the content of nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' access to nursing documentation requires RNs to navigate a complex interplay of factors, including awareness of language-use, influence on the nurse-patient-relative relationships, and the risk of losing essential knowledge. Therefore, although patients' access to nursing documentation can induce a positive change in terms of strengthening the professional focus on documentation, it can also result in changes in documentation practices in ways that may compromise nursing documentation as a working tool.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>The findings emphasize an urgent need to explore and discuss how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way when patients have access to the documentation. Furthermore, to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts with patients, it is essential to focus on and prioritize patient involvement in nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>RNs navigate complex practices when patients have direct online access to nursing documentation content. It is crucial to clarify which content nursing documentation should entail and how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way.</p><p><strong>Reporting: </strong>The COREQ checklist was used for reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨丹麦医院注册护士(RNs)如何在患者可访问电子病历内容的情况下记录护理工作:方法:采用定性研究设计,在 2022 年底和 2023 年初开展的六个焦点小组中收集数据,小组成员包括丹麦一所大学医院住院病房的 31 名注册护士。随后,对收集到的数据进行了定性内容分析:研究结果包括三个主题:(1) 权衡自己的言辞;(2) 建立信任或引发冲突;(3) 冒失去知识的风险。这三个主题共同说明了当患者可以获取护理文件内容时,护士所面临的复杂问题:患者获取护理文件要求护士掌握各种复杂因素的相互作用,包括对语言使用的认识、对护患关系的影响以及丧失基本知识的风险。因此,尽管患者获取护理文件可以在加强对文件的专业关注方面引起积极的变化,但也可能导致文件记录方式的改变,从而损害护理文件作为一种工作工具的作用:研究结果表明,迫切需要探讨和讨论在病人能够接触到护理文件的情况下,如何以安全和适当的方式分享敏感的护理观察结果。此外,为防止与患者之间产生误解和冲突,必须重视并优先考虑患者参与护理记录:影响:当患者可以直接在线访问护理文件内容时,护士需要处理复杂的实践问题。明确护理文件应包含哪些内容以及如何以安全、适当的方式分享敏感的护理观察结果至关重要:报告:使用 COREQ 核对表进行报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating the Complexities of Nursing Documentation When Patients Have Access to the Content: A Qualitative Study.

Aim: To explore how Danish registered nurses (RNs) in hospitals experience documenting nursing care in electronic patient records when the content is accessible to patients.

Methods: In a qualitative research design, data were generated in six focus groups conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, comprising 31 RNs employed in inpatient wards at a university hospital in Denmark. Subsequently, qualitative content analysis was applied to the gathered data.

Results: The findings include three themes: (1) weighing one's words, (2) building trust or triggering conflicts and (3) risking loss of knowledge. Together, these three themes illustrate the complexities that RNs navigate when patients have access to the content of nursing documentation.

Conclusion: Patients' access to nursing documentation requires RNs to navigate a complex interplay of factors, including awareness of language-use, influence on the nurse-patient-relative relationships, and the risk of losing essential knowledge. Therefore, although patients' access to nursing documentation can induce a positive change in terms of strengthening the professional focus on documentation, it can also result in changes in documentation practices in ways that may compromise nursing documentation as a working tool.

Implications for the profession and patient care: The findings emphasize an urgent need to explore and discuss how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way when patients have access to the documentation. Furthermore, to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts with patients, it is essential to focus on and prioritize patient involvement in nursing documentation.

Impact: RNs navigate complex practices when patients have direct online access to nursing documentation content. It is crucial to clarify which content nursing documentation should entail and how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way.

Reporting: The COREQ checklist was used for reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Preparing Graduate Nursing Students to Lead Nursing Green Teams: Approach and Identified Greening Opportunities and Solutions. A Comprehensive Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Different Infant Feeding Types: The Observational Study GREEN MOTHER. Exploring Emotional Well-Being and Support of Midwives Who Provide Termination of Pregnancy Care: An International Survey. Unconscious bias and (nursing) care. "I Am Forever Changed": A Phenomenological Study of the Existential Experiences of Parents of Children and Young People With Complex Care Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1