儿科内窥镜检查中的异丙酚镇静安全问题:日本医疗环境中的特殊考虑因素。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70000
Daisuke Murakami, Masayuki Yamato
{"title":"儿科内窥镜检查中的异丙酚镇静安全问题:日本医疗环境中的特殊考虑因素。","authors":"Daisuke Murakami,&nbsp;Masayuki Yamato","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To the Editor,</p><p>Kudo and colleagues<span><sup>1</sup></span> clearly demonstrated that intravenous propofol anesthesia significantly shortened procedure time in pediatric endoscopy, with no adverse events observed. Subsequent to the revision of Japanese guidelines for endoscopic sedation,<span><sup>2</sup></span> gradual adoption of propofol sedation in adult endoscopic procedures is noted. Importantly, however, this guideline explicitly excludes pediatric populations. Additionally, this guideline refrains from explicitly stating whether non-anesthesiologists can safely administer propofol sedation in endoscopy units. Gastroenterologists should understand that propofol is not recommended for anesthetic induction below the age of 3 years or for anesthetic maintenance below 2 months of age. As discussed in this paper, propofol is contraindicated for pediatric intensive care unit sedation due to the risk of propofol infusion syndrome; thus, excessive use should be avoided. Actually, our hospital witnessed an accidental intensive care unit death of a pediatric patient sedated with propofol.</p><p>Our concern stems from the fact that current evidence regarding safe propofol sedation for endoscopy is based predominantly on international reports. The Japanese medical environment differs significantly from those abroad. While anesthesiologists in many other countries routinely administer sedation, the current structure and resource allocation in Japan makes it practically infeasible to have anesthesiologists permanently stationed in endoscopy units. Unlike benzodiazepines, propofol has a narrow pharmacological range between states of sedation with maintained respiration and that of general anesthesia where spontaneous breathing ceases, making it prone to easily induce over-sedation. Therefore, the guideline also emphasizes the use of various devices supporting safe propofol administration; consequently, continuous administration via a target-controlled infusion pump is recommended, and the importance of capnography and/or electroencephalography is stressed (in Japan, widespread adoption of this monitoring in pediatric patients is insufficient). The methodology in Kudo et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> did not address these recommendations.</p><p>Given the aforementioned precautions for propofol use in pediatric patients, endoscopic sedation in children using propofol warrants more careful consideration, prioritizing safety.</p><p>None.</p><p>- Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: N/A.</p><p>- Informed consent: N/A.</p><p>- Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A.</p><p>- Animal studies: N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propofol sedation safety concerns in pediatric endoscopy: Special considerations in the Japanese medical environment\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Murakami,&nbsp;Masayuki Yamato\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To the Editor,</p><p>Kudo and colleagues<span><sup>1</sup></span> clearly demonstrated that intravenous propofol anesthesia significantly shortened procedure time in pediatric endoscopy, with no adverse events observed. Subsequent to the revision of Japanese guidelines for endoscopic sedation,<span><sup>2</sup></span> gradual adoption of propofol sedation in adult endoscopic procedures is noted. Importantly, however, this guideline explicitly excludes pediatric populations. Additionally, this guideline refrains from explicitly stating whether non-anesthesiologists can safely administer propofol sedation in endoscopy units. Gastroenterologists should understand that propofol is not recommended for anesthetic induction below the age of 3 years or for anesthetic maintenance below 2 months of age. As discussed in this paper, propofol is contraindicated for pediatric intensive care unit sedation due to the risk of propofol infusion syndrome; thus, excessive use should be avoided. Actually, our hospital witnessed an accidental intensive care unit death of a pediatric patient sedated with propofol.</p><p>Our concern stems from the fact that current evidence regarding safe propofol sedation for endoscopy is based predominantly on international reports. The Japanese medical environment differs significantly from those abroad. While anesthesiologists in many other countries routinely administer sedation, the current structure and resource allocation in Japan makes it practically infeasible to have anesthesiologists permanently stationed in endoscopy units. Unlike benzodiazepines, propofol has a narrow pharmacological range between states of sedation with maintained respiration and that of general anesthesia where spontaneous breathing ceases, making it prone to easily induce over-sedation. Therefore, the guideline also emphasizes the use of various devices supporting safe propofol administration; consequently, continuous administration via a target-controlled infusion pump is recommended, and the importance of capnography and/or electroencephalography is stressed (in Japan, widespread adoption of this monitoring in pediatric patients is insufficient). The methodology in Kudo et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> did not address these recommendations.</p><p>Given the aforementioned precautions for propofol use in pediatric patients, endoscopic sedation in children using propofol warrants more careful consideration, prioritizing safety.</p><p>None.</p><p>- Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: N/A.</p><p>- Informed consent: N/A.</p><p>- Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A.</p><p>- Animal studies: N/A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致编辑:Kudo 及其同事1 清楚地表明,静脉注射异丙酚麻醉可显著缩短儿科内窥镜手术的时间,且未观察到不良反应。在日本修订内窥镜镇静指南2 之后,丙泊酚镇静逐渐被用于成人内窥镜手术。但重要的是,该指南明确排除了儿科人群。此外,该指南没有明确说明非麻醉科医生是否可以在内镜室安全地使用异丙酚镇静剂。消化内科医生应该了解,不建议将异丙酚用于 3 岁以下的麻醉诱导或 2 个月以下的麻醉维持。正如本文所讨论的,由于丙泊酚输注综合征的风险,丙泊酚禁用于儿科重症监护室镇静,因此应避免过量使用。事实上,我们医院就曾发生过一名使用异丙酚镇静的儿童患者在重症监护室意外死亡的事件。我们之所以担心,是因为目前有关异丙酚镇静用于内窥镜检查的安全性证据主要是基于国际报道。日本的医疗环境与国外有很大不同。虽然许多其他国家的麻醉医师都会常规使用镇静剂,但日本目前的结构和资源分配使得在内窥镜检查室长期派驻麻醉医师实际上是不可行的。与苯二氮卓类药物不同,异丙酚在维持呼吸的镇静状态和停止自主呼吸的全身麻醉状态之间的药理范围较窄,容易诱发过度镇静。因此,该指南还强调使用各种支持安全使用异丙酚的设备;因此,建议通过目标控制输液泵持续给药,并强调了二氧化碳描记术和/或脑电图的重要性(在日本,这种监测在儿科患者中的应用还不够广泛)。鉴于上述在儿科患者中使用异丙酚的注意事项,在儿童中使用异丙酚进行内窥镜镇静需要更加慎重考虑,并将安全性放在首位:不适用:不适用。- 研究/试验的登记和登记号:不适用:不适用:动物研究:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Propofol sedation safety concerns in pediatric endoscopy: Special considerations in the Japanese medical environment

To the Editor,

Kudo and colleagues1 clearly demonstrated that intravenous propofol anesthesia significantly shortened procedure time in pediatric endoscopy, with no adverse events observed. Subsequent to the revision of Japanese guidelines for endoscopic sedation,2 gradual adoption of propofol sedation in adult endoscopic procedures is noted. Importantly, however, this guideline explicitly excludes pediatric populations. Additionally, this guideline refrains from explicitly stating whether non-anesthesiologists can safely administer propofol sedation in endoscopy units. Gastroenterologists should understand that propofol is not recommended for anesthetic induction below the age of 3 years or for anesthetic maintenance below 2 months of age. As discussed in this paper, propofol is contraindicated for pediatric intensive care unit sedation due to the risk of propofol infusion syndrome; thus, excessive use should be avoided. Actually, our hospital witnessed an accidental intensive care unit death of a pediatric patient sedated with propofol.

Our concern stems from the fact that current evidence regarding safe propofol sedation for endoscopy is based predominantly on international reports. The Japanese medical environment differs significantly from those abroad. While anesthesiologists in many other countries routinely administer sedation, the current structure and resource allocation in Japan makes it practically infeasible to have anesthesiologists permanently stationed in endoscopy units. Unlike benzodiazepines, propofol has a narrow pharmacological range between states of sedation with maintained respiration and that of general anesthesia where spontaneous breathing ceases, making it prone to easily induce over-sedation. Therefore, the guideline also emphasizes the use of various devices supporting safe propofol administration; consequently, continuous administration via a target-controlled infusion pump is recommended, and the importance of capnography and/or electroencephalography is stressed (in Japan, widespread adoption of this monitoring in pediatric patients is insufficient). The methodology in Kudo et al.1 did not address these recommendations.

Given the aforementioned precautions for propofol use in pediatric patients, endoscopic sedation in children using propofol warrants more careful consideration, prioritizing safety.

None.

- Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: N/A.

- Informed consent: N/A.

- Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: N/A.

- Animal studies: N/A.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PuraStat as secondary therapy for hemostasis in Mallory−Weiss syndrome with oral antithrombotic medication Correction to “The outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for small focal liver lesions measuring ≤2 cm” Endoscopic features of the duodenal pyloric gland adenoma: A case series of 14 patients Impact of time from diagnosis to endoscopic submucosal dissection on curability in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma The competency of the novel through-the-scope suture device for gastric mucosal defects: In vivo study in a porcine model (with video)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1