对预先授权负担的看法和解决方案。

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae096
Nikhil R Sahni, Brooke Istvan, Celia Stafford, David Cutler
{"title":"对预先授权负担的看法和解决方案。","authors":"Nikhil R Sahni, Brooke Istvan, Celia Stafford, David Cutler","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prior authorization (PA) process consumes time and money on the part of patients, providers, and payers. While some research shows substantial possible savings in the PA process, identifying what different groups can do is not as well known. Thus, organizations have struggled to capture this opportunity. To understand different perspectives on PA burden and receptivity to possible changes in the PA process, we surveyed 1005 patients, 1010 provider employees, and 115 private payer employees. Patients reported the longest perceived wait times but indicated the highest perceived approval rates and lowest perceived burden. The relatively low burden for patients is because most do not have to engage in PA directly. Provider respondents reported spending time equivalent of more than 100 000 full-time registered nurses per year on prior authorization. Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a possible solution: 65% of private payer respondents reported that their organizations planned to incorporate AI into the process in the next 3 to 5 years. Intended adoption by provider respondents is much smaller (11%). Private payer respondents cited cybersecurity concerns and a lack of technical infrastructure as barriers; provider respondents cited lack of budget and limited trust in the technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 9","pages":"qxae096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of prior authorization burden and solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Nikhil R Sahni, Brooke Istvan, Celia Stafford, David Cutler\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prior authorization (PA) process consumes time and money on the part of patients, providers, and payers. While some research shows substantial possible savings in the PA process, identifying what different groups can do is not as well known. Thus, organizations have struggled to capture this opportunity. To understand different perspectives on PA burden and receptivity to possible changes in the PA process, we surveyed 1005 patients, 1010 provider employees, and 115 private payer employees. Patients reported the longest perceived wait times but indicated the highest perceived approval rates and lowest perceived burden. The relatively low burden for patients is because most do not have to engage in PA directly. Provider respondents reported spending time equivalent of more than 100 000 full-time registered nurses per year on prior authorization. Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a possible solution: 65% of private payer respondents reported that their organizations planned to incorporate AI into the process in the next 3 to 5 years. Intended adoption by provider respondents is much smaller (11%). Private payer respondents cited cybersecurity concerns and a lack of technical infrastructure as barriers; provider respondents cited lack of budget and limited trust in the technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"qxae096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425057/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事先授权(PA)流程耗费了患者、医疗服务提供者和支付方的时间和金钱。虽然一些研究表明,事先授权过程中可能会节省大量费用,但如何确定不同的团体可以做些什么却并不为人所知。因此,各机构一直在努力抓住这一机遇。为了了解不同群体对 PA 负担的看法以及对 PA 流程中可能出现的变化的接受程度,我们对 1005 名患者、1010 名医疗服务提供者员工和 115 名私人支付方员工进行了调查。患者报告的等待时间最长,但他们认为批准率最高、负担最低。患者的负担相对较轻是因为大多数患者不必直接参与 PA。医疗机构受访者表示,每年花费在事先授权上的时间相当于 100 000 多名全职注册护士。人工智能 (AI) 是一种可能的解决方案:65% 的私营支付方受访者表示,他们的组织计划在未来 3 到 5 年内将人工智能纳入流程。而医疗服务提供者受访者打算采用人工智能的比例要小得多(11%)。私人付费者受访者认为网络安全问题和缺乏技术基础设施是障碍;医疗服务提供者受访者则认为缺乏预算和对技术的信任有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of prior authorization burden and solutions.

The prior authorization (PA) process consumes time and money on the part of patients, providers, and payers. While some research shows substantial possible savings in the PA process, identifying what different groups can do is not as well known. Thus, organizations have struggled to capture this opportunity. To understand different perspectives on PA burden and receptivity to possible changes in the PA process, we surveyed 1005 patients, 1010 provider employees, and 115 private payer employees. Patients reported the longest perceived wait times but indicated the highest perceived approval rates and lowest perceived burden. The relatively low burden for patients is because most do not have to engage in PA directly. Provider respondents reported spending time equivalent of more than 100 000 full-time registered nurses per year on prior authorization. Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a possible solution: 65% of private payer respondents reported that their organizations planned to incorporate AI into the process in the next 3 to 5 years. Intended adoption by provider respondents is much smaller (11%). Private payer respondents cited cybersecurity concerns and a lack of technical infrastructure as barriers; provider respondents cited lack of budget and limited trust in the technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States. Examining the use of telehealth to initiate buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1