S M Gondivkar, G S Sarode, A Warhekar, M Yuwanati, R Ingole, A R Gadbail, S C Sarode, P Motghare
{"title":"口腔癌患者自杀倾向的发生率和风险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"S M Gondivkar, G S Sarode, A Warhekar, M Yuwanati, R Ingole, A R Gadbail, S C Sarode, P Motghare","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective was to estimate the pooled prevalence of suicidal ideation (SI) and related risk factors in oral cancer (OC). Studies that specified SI in OC patients were considered eligible. SI prevalence and associated risk factors were extracted from the included studies for qualitative analysis and meta-analysis. Five studies (two retrospective, two cross-sectional, and one prospective longitudinal) were included in this review. Out of a total 15,475 OC patients, SI was reported in 117. The pooled prevalence of SI was 6% (95% confidence interval 1-22%). The prevalence of SI varied widely across the included studies, from 0.26% to 18.7%. Four studies described SI assessment methods, which were DS-MV, PHQ-9, Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation, and psychiatric interviews. Older age, depression, demoralization, previous cancer history, psychiatric history, alcohol dependence, anxiety, living alone, and poor quality of life were frequently mentioned as risk factors of SI. The prevalence of SI varied across studies and was probably affected by the method of assessment, treatment, and postoperative care. SI was consistently predicted with psychological distress. It is essential to raise awareness of demographic, clinical, and psychological associations with SI in order to assess risks and design interventions for this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation in oral cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"S M Gondivkar, G S Sarode, A Warhekar, M Yuwanati, R Ingole, A R Gadbail, S C Sarode, P Motghare\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijom.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective was to estimate the pooled prevalence of suicidal ideation (SI) and related risk factors in oral cancer (OC). Studies that specified SI in OC patients were considered eligible. SI prevalence and associated risk factors were extracted from the included studies for qualitative analysis and meta-analysis. Five studies (two retrospective, two cross-sectional, and one prospective longitudinal) were included in this review. Out of a total 15,475 OC patients, SI was reported in 117. The pooled prevalence of SI was 6% (95% confidence interval 1-22%). The prevalence of SI varied widely across the included studies, from 0.26% to 18.7%. Four studies described SI assessment methods, which were DS-MV, PHQ-9, Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation, and psychiatric interviews. Older age, depression, demoralization, previous cancer history, psychiatric history, alcohol dependence, anxiety, living alone, and poor quality of life were frequently mentioned as risk factors of SI. The prevalence of SI varied across studies and was probably affected by the method of assessment, treatment, and postoperative care. SI was consistently predicted with psychological distress. It is essential to raise awareness of demographic, clinical, and psychological associations with SI in order to assess risks and design interventions for this cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
该研究旨在估算口腔癌(OC)患者自杀意念(SI)及相关风险因素的总体流行率。符合条件的研究均指明了口腔癌患者的自杀意念。从纳入的研究中提取 SI 患病率和相关风险因素,进行定性分析和荟萃分析。本综述共纳入了五项研究(两项回顾性研究、两项横断面研究和一项前瞻性纵向研究)。在总共 15,475 例 OC 患者中,有 117 例报告了 SI。汇总的 SI 患病率为 6%(95% 置信区间为 1-22%)。纳入研究的 SI 患病率差异很大,从 0.26% 到 18.7%。四项研究介绍了 SI 的评估方法,包括 DS-MV、PHQ-9、贝克自杀意念量表和精神科访谈。高龄、抑郁、意志消沉、既往癌症病史、精神病史、酒精依赖、焦虑、独居和生活质量差是经常被提及的 SI 风险因素。不同研究的 SI 发生率各不相同,可能受到评估、治疗和术后护理方法的影响。SI 始终与心理困扰相关。有必要提高人们对 SI 的人口、临床和心理关联的认识,以便为这一群体评估风险和设计干预措施。
Prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation in oral cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The objective was to estimate the pooled prevalence of suicidal ideation (SI) and related risk factors in oral cancer (OC). Studies that specified SI in OC patients were considered eligible. SI prevalence and associated risk factors were extracted from the included studies for qualitative analysis and meta-analysis. Five studies (two retrospective, two cross-sectional, and one prospective longitudinal) were included in this review. Out of a total 15,475 OC patients, SI was reported in 117. The pooled prevalence of SI was 6% (95% confidence interval 1-22%). The prevalence of SI varied widely across the included studies, from 0.26% to 18.7%. Four studies described SI assessment methods, which were DS-MV, PHQ-9, Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation, and psychiatric interviews. Older age, depression, demoralization, previous cancer history, psychiatric history, alcohol dependence, anxiety, living alone, and poor quality of life were frequently mentioned as risk factors of SI. The prevalence of SI varied across studies and was probably affected by the method of assessment, treatment, and postoperative care. SI was consistently predicted with psychological distress. It is essential to raise awareness of demographic, clinical, and psychological associations with SI in order to assess risks and design interventions for this cohort.