印度人口样本中食指、中指、无名指和小指的正常活动范围。

Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788593
Mohamed Ibrahim B K, P Umar Farooq Baba, Veena Singh, Ankur Karanjkar, Latha Madhavan, Raheeb Ahmad Shah, Ansarul Haq, Manoj Pawar, Anupama Kumari, Nikhil Panse, Vishnubabu G, Shyamnath Krishna Pandian, Anirudha Sharma, Rajagopalan Krishnamoorthy, Mukund Thatte, Anil Bhat, Sridhar Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"印度人口样本中食指、中指、无名指和小指的正常活动范围。","authors":"Mohamed Ibrahim B K, P Umar Farooq Baba, Veena Singh, Ankur Karanjkar, Latha Madhavan, Raheeb Ahmad Shah, Ansarul Haq, Manoj Pawar, Anupama Kumari, Nikhil Panse, Vishnubabu G, Shyamnath Krishna Pandian, Anirudha Sharma, Rajagopalan Krishnamoorthy, Mukund Thatte, Anil Bhat, Sridhar Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The normative data for finger range of motion (ROM) are not available for the Indian population. The aim of our study was to measure the active ROM of finger joints in normal healthy volunteers in a sample of Indian population. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  This is a prospective observational study conducted as a part of the Indian normative data project of the Indian Society for Surgery of the Hand (ISSH). The study included one participating center from four geographical regions of the country. Certified goniometers were used to measure the ROM of fingers in all centers. A standardized methodology was devised. A pilot study was done to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability, following which data were collected by one measurement. <b>Results</b>  This pilot study was performed in 20 hands that showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability correlation. A total of 390 hands were measured in four participating centers. Active flexion of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was the highest in the middle finger (86.6 ± 10.4 degrees) followed by the index finger (86.0 ± 9.2 degrees), little finger (85.0 ± 8.4 degrees), and ring finger (84.2 ± 8.6 degrees). The index finger (97.2 ± 16.9 degrees) showed maximum proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion followed by the middle finger (96.2 ± 15.8 degrees), ring finger (96.0 ± 15.9 degrees), and little finger (91.8 ± 12.7 degrees). Distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint flexion increased from the index finger (81.6 ± 13.9 degrees) to the little finger (84.6 ± 12.9 degrees). The little finger MCP joint (26.3 ± 6.2 degrees) showed maximum extension followed by the index finger (25.7 ± 6.8 degrees), middle finger (24.7 ± 6.7 degrees) and ring finger (22.3 ± 7.1 degrees). The middle finger (15.6 ± 8.1 degrees) and ring finger (16.2 ± 8 degrees) had more PIP joint extension when compared to the index (13.7 ± 7.8 degrees) and little finger (13.2 ± 8.4 degrees). The ring finger (8.1 ± 6.8 degrees) and the middle finger (8.4 ± 6.9 degrees) had more DIP joint extension when compared with the index finger (6.0 ± 6.0 degrees) and the little finger (6.8 ± 6.7 degrees). Total active motion (TAM) of the middle finger (315.9 ± 31.0 degrees) was the maximum followed by the index finger (310.2 ± 27.3 degrees), ring finger (308.8 ± 29.1 degrees), and little finger (307.8 ± 25.2 degrees). Gender, body mass index (BMI), mother tongue, geographical location, and occupation were factors that had significant correlation, while no significant differences based on side, hand dominance, and age were noted. <b>Conclusion</b>  We have reported normative data of finger ROM and TAM for the index, middle, ring, and little fingers in the Indian population. Finger ROM in the Indian population is highly variable. The observed TAM in the Indian population is higher than what is reported earlier.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Normal Active Range of Motion of the Index, Middle, Ring, and Little Fingers in a Sample of Indian Population.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Ibrahim B K, P Umar Farooq Baba, Veena Singh, Ankur Karanjkar, Latha Madhavan, Raheeb Ahmad Shah, Ansarul Haq, Manoj Pawar, Anupama Kumari, Nikhil Panse, Vishnubabu G, Shyamnath Krishna Pandian, Anirudha Sharma, Rajagopalan Krishnamoorthy, Mukund Thatte, Anil Bhat, Sridhar Krishnamoorthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The normative data for finger range of motion (ROM) are not available for the Indian population. The aim of our study was to measure the active ROM of finger joints in normal healthy volunteers in a sample of Indian population. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  This is a prospective observational study conducted as a part of the Indian normative data project of the Indian Society for Surgery of the Hand (ISSH). The study included one participating center from four geographical regions of the country. Certified goniometers were used to measure the ROM of fingers in all centers. A standardized methodology was devised. A pilot study was done to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability, following which data were collected by one measurement. <b>Results</b>  This pilot study was performed in 20 hands that showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability correlation. A total of 390 hands were measured in four participating centers. Active flexion of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was the highest in the middle finger (86.6 ± 10.4 degrees) followed by the index finger (86.0 ± 9.2 degrees), little finger (85.0 ± 8.4 degrees), and ring finger (84.2 ± 8.6 degrees). The index finger (97.2 ± 16.9 degrees) showed maximum proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion followed by the middle finger (96.2 ± 15.8 degrees), ring finger (96.0 ± 15.9 degrees), and little finger (91.8 ± 12.7 degrees). Distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint flexion increased from the index finger (81.6 ± 13.9 degrees) to the little finger (84.6 ± 12.9 degrees). The little finger MCP joint (26.3 ± 6.2 degrees) showed maximum extension followed by the index finger (25.7 ± 6.8 degrees), middle finger (24.7 ± 6.7 degrees) and ring finger (22.3 ± 7.1 degrees). The middle finger (15.6 ± 8.1 degrees) and ring finger (16.2 ± 8 degrees) had more PIP joint extension when compared to the index (13.7 ± 7.8 degrees) and little finger (13.2 ± 8.4 degrees). The ring finger (8.1 ± 6.8 degrees) and the middle finger (8.4 ± 6.9 degrees) had more DIP joint extension when compared with the index finger (6.0 ± 6.0 degrees) and the little finger (6.8 ± 6.7 degrees). Total active motion (TAM) of the middle finger (315.9 ± 31.0 degrees) was the maximum followed by the index finger (310.2 ± 27.3 degrees), ring finger (308.8 ± 29.1 degrees), and little finger (307.8 ± 25.2 degrees). Gender, body mass index (BMI), mother tongue, geographical location, and occupation were factors that had significant correlation, while no significant differences based on side, hand dominance, and age were noted. <b>Conclusion</b>  We have reported normative data of finger ROM and TAM for the index, middle, ring, and little fingers in the Indian population. Finger ROM in the Indian population is highly variable. The observed TAM in the Indian population is higher than what is reported earlier.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 印度人的手指活动范围(ROM)没有标准数据。我们的研究旨在测量印度正常健康志愿者的手指关节活动范围。材料和方法 这是一项前瞻性观察研究,是印度手外科学会(ISSH)印度标准数据项目的一部分。该研究包括来自全国四个地区的一个参与中心。所有中心均使用经过认证的动态关节角度计测量手指的ROM。制定了标准化的方法。为评估观察者间和观察者内的可靠性,进行了一项试验性研究,随后通过一次测量收集数据。结果 对 20 只手进行了试点研究,结果显示观察者间和观察者内的可靠性相关性良好。四个参与中心共测量了 390 只手。中指掌指关节(MCP)的主动屈曲度最高(86.6 ± 10.4 度),其次是食指(86.0 ± 9.2 度)、小指(85.0 ± 8.4 度)和无名指(84.2 ± 8.6 度)。食指(97.2 ± 16.9 度)的近侧指间关节(PIP)屈曲最大,其次是中指(96.2 ± 15.8 度)、无名指(96.0 ± 15.9 度)和小指(91.8 ± 12.7 度)。从食指(81.6 ± 13.9 度)到小指(84.6 ± 12.9 度),远端指间关节(DIP)的弯曲度有所增加。小指 MCP 关节(26.3 ± 6.2 度)的伸展度最大,其次是食指(25.7 ± 6.8 度)、中指(24.7 ± 6.7 度)和无名指(22.3 ± 7.1 度)。与食指(13.7 ± 7.8 度)和小指(13.2 ± 8.4 度)相比,中指(15.6 ± 8.1 度)和无名指(16.2 ± 8 度)的 PIP 关节伸展度更大。与食指(6.0 ± 6.0 度)和小指(6.8 ± 6.7 度)相比,无名指(8.1 ± 6.8 度)和中指(8.4 ± 6.9 度)的 DIP 关节伸展度更大。中指的总活动度(TAM)最大(315.9 ± 31.0 度),其次是食指(310.2 ± 27.3 度)、无名指(308.8 ± 29.1 度)和小指(307.8 ± 25.2 度)。性别、体重指数 (BMI)、母语、地理位置和职业等因素具有显著的相关性,而侧、手的优势和年龄则无显著差异。结论 我们报告了印度人群食指、中指、无名指和小指的手指ROM和TAM的标准数据。印度人的手指ROM变化很大。在印度人群中观察到的TAM高于之前的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
The Normal Active Range of Motion of the Index, Middle, Ring, and Little Fingers in a Sample of Indian Population.

Background  The normative data for finger range of motion (ROM) are not available for the Indian population. The aim of our study was to measure the active ROM of finger joints in normal healthy volunteers in a sample of Indian population. Materials and Methods  This is a prospective observational study conducted as a part of the Indian normative data project of the Indian Society for Surgery of the Hand (ISSH). The study included one participating center from four geographical regions of the country. Certified goniometers were used to measure the ROM of fingers in all centers. A standardized methodology was devised. A pilot study was done to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability, following which data were collected by one measurement. Results  This pilot study was performed in 20 hands that showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability correlation. A total of 390 hands were measured in four participating centers. Active flexion of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was the highest in the middle finger (86.6 ± 10.4 degrees) followed by the index finger (86.0 ± 9.2 degrees), little finger (85.0 ± 8.4 degrees), and ring finger (84.2 ± 8.6 degrees). The index finger (97.2 ± 16.9 degrees) showed maximum proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion followed by the middle finger (96.2 ± 15.8 degrees), ring finger (96.0 ± 15.9 degrees), and little finger (91.8 ± 12.7 degrees). Distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint flexion increased from the index finger (81.6 ± 13.9 degrees) to the little finger (84.6 ± 12.9 degrees). The little finger MCP joint (26.3 ± 6.2 degrees) showed maximum extension followed by the index finger (25.7 ± 6.8 degrees), middle finger (24.7 ± 6.7 degrees) and ring finger (22.3 ± 7.1 degrees). The middle finger (15.6 ± 8.1 degrees) and ring finger (16.2 ± 8 degrees) had more PIP joint extension when compared to the index (13.7 ± 7.8 degrees) and little finger (13.2 ± 8.4 degrees). The ring finger (8.1 ± 6.8 degrees) and the middle finger (8.4 ± 6.9 degrees) had more DIP joint extension when compared with the index finger (6.0 ± 6.0 degrees) and the little finger (6.8 ± 6.7 degrees). Total active motion (TAM) of the middle finger (315.9 ± 31.0 degrees) was the maximum followed by the index finger (310.2 ± 27.3 degrees), ring finger (308.8 ± 29.1 degrees), and little finger (307.8 ± 25.2 degrees). Gender, body mass index (BMI), mother tongue, geographical location, and occupation were factors that had significant correlation, while no significant differences based on side, hand dominance, and age were noted. Conclusion  We have reported normative data of finger ROM and TAM for the index, middle, ring, and little fingers in the Indian population. Finger ROM in the Indian population is highly variable. The observed TAM in the Indian population is higher than what is reported earlier.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1