少并不总是多:与内容稀少的数数书相比,内容丰富、意义深远的数数书更能加深幼儿对数字的理解。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Developmental Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1037/dev0001826
Cristina Carrazza, Susan C Levine
{"title":"少并不总是多:与内容稀少的数数书相比,内容丰富、意义深远的数数书更能加深幼儿对数字的理解。","authors":"Cristina Carrazza, Susan C Levine","doi":"10.1037/dev0001826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children vary widely in their number knowledge by the time they enter kindergarten, and this variation is related to their future academic success. Although talk about number predicts children's early understanding of foundational number concepts, we know little about whether interventions can increase this talk nor about the types of number talk that are most beneficial to children's number understanding. The current project examines whether embedding number talk in goal-based stories leads to more robust number learning than providing the same numeric input outside of this context. Parent-child dyads (<i>N</i> = 71; child age = 3 years) were randomly assigned within their preintervention cardinal number understanding levels to one of three conditions: rich counting books (narrative and pictures involving a number goal), sparse counting books (text and pictures that provide opportunities to count and label the same cardinalities as in the rich condition but with no narrative), or nonnumerical control books that involve labeling colors of objects. Children's number knowledge was measured at pretest and at 2 and 4 weeks into the intervention. Findings showed that children randomized to rich counting book condition showed significantly greater cardinal number knowledge and counting skill by the final testing session compared to children in the sparse counting book condition and the color control book condition, which did not significantly differ from each other. Results have implications for the types of number talk that most effectively support children's number learning in the home environment and for the design of interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Less is not always more: Rich and meaningful counting books lead to greater gains in number understanding than sparse counting books.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Carrazza, Susan C Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0001826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children vary widely in their number knowledge by the time they enter kindergarten, and this variation is related to their future academic success. Although talk about number predicts children's early understanding of foundational number concepts, we know little about whether interventions can increase this talk nor about the types of number talk that are most beneficial to children's number understanding. The current project examines whether embedding number talk in goal-based stories leads to more robust number learning than providing the same numeric input outside of this context. Parent-child dyads (<i>N</i> = 71; child age = 3 years) were randomly assigned within their preintervention cardinal number understanding levels to one of three conditions: rich counting books (narrative and pictures involving a number goal), sparse counting books (text and pictures that provide opportunities to count and label the same cardinalities as in the rich condition but with no narrative), or nonnumerical control books that involve labeling colors of objects. Children's number knowledge was measured at pretest and at 2 and 4 weeks into the intervention. Findings showed that children randomized to rich counting book condition showed significantly greater cardinal number knowledge and counting skill by the final testing session compared to children in the sparse counting book condition and the color control book condition, which did not significantly differ from each other. Results have implications for the types of number talk that most effectively support children's number learning in the home environment and for the design of interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001826\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童在进入幼儿园时,对数字的认识存在很大差异,而这种差异与他们未来的学业成就息息相关。虽然关于数字的谈话能预测儿童对基础数字概念的早期理解,但我们对干预措施是否能增加这种谈话以及对儿童数字理解最有益的数字谈话类型知之甚少。本项目研究了在基于目标的故事中嵌入数字对话是否会比在此背景之外提供相同的数字输入更能促进儿童的数字学习。亲子二人组(N = 71;儿童年龄 = 3 岁)在干预前的心算数字理解水平内被随机分配到三种条件之一:丰富的数数书(涉及数字目标的叙述和图片)、稀疏的数数书(提供数数和标注与丰富条件相同的心算数字机会的文字和图片,但没有叙述)或涉及标注物体颜色的非数字对照书。儿童的数字知识是在干预前、干预后 2 周和 4 周进行测量的。结果表明,在最后的测试中,被随机分配到内容丰富的数数书条件下的儿童,与内容稀少的数数书条件下的儿童和颜色对照书条件下的儿童相比,在心数知识和数数技能方面都有显著提高,但两者之间没有显著差异。研究结果对在家庭环境中最有效地帮助儿童学习数字的数字谈话类型以及干预措施的设计具有启示意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Less is not always more: Rich and meaningful counting books lead to greater gains in number understanding than sparse counting books.

Children vary widely in their number knowledge by the time they enter kindergarten, and this variation is related to their future academic success. Although talk about number predicts children's early understanding of foundational number concepts, we know little about whether interventions can increase this talk nor about the types of number talk that are most beneficial to children's number understanding. The current project examines whether embedding number talk in goal-based stories leads to more robust number learning than providing the same numeric input outside of this context. Parent-child dyads (N = 71; child age = 3 years) were randomly assigned within their preintervention cardinal number understanding levels to one of three conditions: rich counting books (narrative and pictures involving a number goal), sparse counting books (text and pictures that provide opportunities to count and label the same cardinalities as in the rich condition but with no narrative), or nonnumerical control books that involve labeling colors of objects. Children's number knowledge was measured at pretest and at 2 and 4 weeks into the intervention. Findings showed that children randomized to rich counting book condition showed significantly greater cardinal number knowledge and counting skill by the final testing session compared to children in the sparse counting book condition and the color control book condition, which did not significantly differ from each other. Results have implications for the types of number talk that most effectively support children's number learning in the home environment and for the design of interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
期刊最新文献
Does inducing growth-oriented mindsets about math ability in parents enhance children's math mindsets, affect, and achievement? How relations between early reading skills and third-grade mathematics outcomes vary across distribution: A quantile regression approach. Children's social preference for peers engaged in brilliance-required activities: The impact of gender and race. The development of math skills from grades 1 to 12: Novel findings using person-oriented approach. The effect of unconditional cash transfers on maternal assessments of children's early language and socioemotional development: Experimental evidence from U.S. families residing in poverty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1