使用术中计算机断层扫描对颧骨颌面复合体修复手术入路数量的影响

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2024.0168
Alyssa K Ovaitt, Jamie R Oliver, Logan McKinney, Tuleen Sawaf, John Flynn, Kevin Sykes, David J Kriet, Clinton D Humphrey
{"title":"使用术中计算机断层扫描对颧骨颌面复合体修复手术入路数量的影响","authors":"Alyssa K Ovaitt, Jamie R Oliver, Logan McKinney, Tuleen Sawaf, John Flynn, Kevin Sykes, David J Kriet, Clinton D Humphrey","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are repaired using a variety of surgical approaches. Utilization of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) may reduce the number of surgical approaches. <b>Study Objective:</b> To compare the use of intraoperative CT for the operative repair of ZMC fractures, as measured by the number of surgical approaches. <b>Method:</b> A retrospective review was completed on patients who underwent surgical repair of ZMC fractures by facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons at a tertiary hospital. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-four patients underwent open ZMC repair between 2009 and 2022. Patients had a median age of 42 years (range: 19-93, interquartile range 29-59), were 76.2% Male (<i>n</i> = 64) and 78.6% (<i>N</i> = 66) White. There were 38 and 46 patients in the pre- and post-intraoperative CT cohorts, respectively. The most common incision utilized was a gingivobuccal incision (98.8%), followed by a transconjunctival approach (47.6%). Cases in which CT was utilized had a significantly reduced number of incisions (mean incisions: 2.45 pre vs. 1.67 post, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with large reductions in the rate of transconjunctival incisions (pre-intraoperative CT: 73.7%; post-intraoperative CT: 26.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lateral canthotomy incisions (23.7% vs. 4.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Intraoperative CT reduces the number of surgical approaches in patients with ZMC trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography on the Number of Surgical Approaches Used for Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa K Ovaitt, Jamie R Oliver, Logan McKinney, Tuleen Sawaf, John Flynn, Kevin Sykes, David J Kriet, Clinton D Humphrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are repaired using a variety of surgical approaches. Utilization of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) may reduce the number of surgical approaches. <b>Study Objective:</b> To compare the use of intraoperative CT for the operative repair of ZMC fractures, as measured by the number of surgical approaches. <b>Method:</b> A retrospective review was completed on patients who underwent surgical repair of ZMC fractures by facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons at a tertiary hospital. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-four patients underwent open ZMC repair between 2009 and 2022. Patients had a median age of 42 years (range: 19-93, interquartile range 29-59), were 76.2% Male (<i>n</i> = 64) and 78.6% (<i>N</i> = 66) White. There were 38 and 46 patients in the pre- and post-intraoperative CT cohorts, respectively. The most common incision utilized was a gingivobuccal incision (98.8%), followed by a transconjunctival approach (47.6%). Cases in which CT was utilized had a significantly reduced number of incisions (mean incisions: 2.45 pre vs. 1.67 post, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with large reductions in the rate of transconjunctival incisions (pre-intraoperative CT: 73.7%; post-intraoperative CT: 26.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lateral canthotomy incisions (23.7% vs. 4.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Intraoperative CT reduces the number of surgical approaches in patients with ZMC trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2024.0168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颧骨颌面复合体(ZMC)骨折的修复有多种手术方法。利用术中计算机断层扫描(CT)可减少手术方法的数量。研究目的:比较术中 CT 在颧颌面复合体骨折手术修复中的应用,以手术方法的数量来衡量。研究方法:对 ZMC 骨折患者进行回顾性分析:对一家三级医院的面部整形和重建外科医生对 ZMC 骨折进行手术修复的患者进行回顾性研究。结果2009年至2022年期间,84名患者接受了开放式ZMC修复术。患者的中位年龄为42岁(范围:19-93岁,四分位间范围为29-59岁),76.2%为男性(n = 64),78.6%为白人(n = 66)。术前和术后 CT 组别分别有 38 和 46 名患者。最常用的切口是龈颊切口(98.8%),其次是经结膜切口(47.6%)。使用 CT 的病例切口数量明显减少(平均切口:术前 2.45 个,术后 1.67 个,p < 0.001),其中经结膜切口的比例大幅降低(术前 CT:73.7%;术后 CT:26.1%,p < 0.001),外侧颊切口的比例也大幅降低(23.7% 对 4.3%,p < 0.001)。结论:术中 CT 可减少 ZMC 外伤患者的手术方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography on the Number of Surgical Approaches Used for Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Repair.

Background: Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are repaired using a variety of surgical approaches. Utilization of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) may reduce the number of surgical approaches. Study Objective: To compare the use of intraoperative CT for the operative repair of ZMC fractures, as measured by the number of surgical approaches. Method: A retrospective review was completed on patients who underwent surgical repair of ZMC fractures by facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons at a tertiary hospital. Results: Eighty-four patients underwent open ZMC repair between 2009 and 2022. Patients had a median age of 42 years (range: 19-93, interquartile range 29-59), were 76.2% Male (n = 64) and 78.6% (N = 66) White. There were 38 and 46 patients in the pre- and post-intraoperative CT cohorts, respectively. The most common incision utilized was a gingivobuccal incision (98.8%), followed by a transconjunctival approach (47.6%). Cases in which CT was utilized had a significantly reduced number of incisions (mean incisions: 2.45 pre vs. 1.67 post, p < 0.001), with large reductions in the rate of transconjunctival incisions (pre-intraoperative CT: 73.7%; post-intraoperative CT: 26.1%, p < 0.001) and lateral canthotomy incisions (23.7% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Intraoperative CT reduces the number of surgical approaches in patients with ZMC trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Cost Comparison of Industry Versus In-House Three-Dimensional Printed Models for Microvascular Mandible Reconstruction. Intradermal Injection of Tranexamic Acid for the Treatment of Adult Melasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Tranexamic Acid in Rhytidectomy: A Split-Face Multi-Institutional Study. Commentary on Von Sneidern et al's "Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Facial Palsy: Opportunities for Optimization at a Single Institution."-Bridging the Gap Between Guidelines and Practice. Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Facial Palsy: Opportunities for Optimization at a Single Institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1