将口服葡萄糖耐量试验后恢复到空腹状态的程度与未来罹患糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病的风险联系起来:来自 TLGS 的启示。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Journal of Diabetes Investigation Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1111/jdi.14308
Soroush Masrouri, Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh, Maryam Tohidi, Fereidoun Azizi, Farzad Hadaegh
{"title":"将口服葡萄糖耐量试验后恢复到空腹状态的程度与未来罹患糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病的风险联系起来:来自 TLGS 的启示。","authors":"Soroush Masrouri, Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh, Maryam Tohidi, Fereidoun Azizi, Farzad Hadaegh","doi":"10.1111/jdi.14308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the risk of difference between 2 h post-load plasma glucose (2 h-PG) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) on incident prediabetes/type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among normoglycemic individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 4,971 individuals aged ≥20 years, the associations of the difference between 2 h-PG and FPG with outcomes were examined using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis. Participants were categorized into three groups: a low post-load group (2 h-PG ≤ FPG, as the reference group); a high post-load group (2 h-PG > FPG and ≥75th percentile of the difference); and a medium post-load group (2 h-PG > FPG and <75th percentile of the difference), which was further categorized into three groups by equal ranges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median of 11.5 years of follow-up, 2,331 new cases of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes and 360 cases of type 2 diabetes occurred. Greater risks of incident prediabetes/type 2 diabetes in second (9-16 mg/dL) and third (17-24 mg/dL) medium post-load, as well as high post-load (≥25 mg/dL) categories, were found, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.26 (1.11-1.44), 1.32 (1.15-1.51), and 1.69 (1.51-1.90), respectively; the issue was more prominent among women (P for interaction = 0.005). The risk of incident type 2 diabetes was also higher for these categories. After further adjustment for the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, result remained essentially unchanged. Even among individuals with low normal FPG (i.e., <90 mg/dL), ≥9 mg/dL difference between 2 h-PG and FPG increased the risk of composite prediabetes/ type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater levels of 2 h-PG as low as 9 mg/dL than FPG among normoglycemic individuals is a harbinger of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes development.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking extent of return to fasting state after oral glucose tolerance test to future risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: Insights from the TLGS.\",\"authors\":\"Soroush Masrouri, Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh, Maryam Tohidi, Fereidoun Azizi, Farzad Hadaegh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jdi.14308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the risk of difference between 2 h post-load plasma glucose (2 h-PG) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) on incident prediabetes/type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among normoglycemic individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 4,971 individuals aged ≥20 years, the associations of the difference between 2 h-PG and FPG with outcomes were examined using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis. Participants were categorized into three groups: a low post-load group (2 h-PG ≤ FPG, as the reference group); a high post-load group (2 h-PG > FPG and ≥75th percentile of the difference); and a medium post-load group (2 h-PG > FPG and <75th percentile of the difference), which was further categorized into three groups by equal ranges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median of 11.5 years of follow-up, 2,331 new cases of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes and 360 cases of type 2 diabetes occurred. Greater risks of incident prediabetes/type 2 diabetes in second (9-16 mg/dL) and third (17-24 mg/dL) medium post-load, as well as high post-load (≥25 mg/dL) categories, were found, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.26 (1.11-1.44), 1.32 (1.15-1.51), and 1.69 (1.51-1.90), respectively; the issue was more prominent among women (P for interaction = 0.005). The risk of incident type 2 diabetes was also higher for these categories. After further adjustment for the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, result remained essentially unchanged. Even among individuals with low normal FPG (i.e., <90 mg/dL), ≥9 mg/dL difference between 2 h-PG and FPG increased the risk of composite prediabetes/ type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater levels of 2 h-PG as low as 9 mg/dL than FPG among normoglycemic individuals is a harbinger of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.14308\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.14308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在血糖正常的人群中,评估负荷后 2 小时血浆葡萄糖(2 h-PG)与空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)之间的差异对糖尿病前期/2 型糖尿病(T2DM)发病的风险:在 4971 名年龄≥20 岁的人群中,采用多变量调整 Cox 回归分析法研究了 2 h-PG 和 FPG 之间的差异与结果的关系。参与者被分为三组:低负荷后组(2 h-PG ≤ FPG,作为参照组);高负荷后组(2 h-PG > FPG 且差值≥第 75 百分位数);中负荷后组(2 h-PG > FPG 且结果:在中位数为 11.5 年的随访期间,新增 2 331 例糖尿病前期/2 型糖尿病病例和 360 例 2 型糖尿病病例。结果发现,负荷后第二(9-16 毫克/分升)和第三(17-24 毫克/分升)中度负荷以及负荷后高度负荷(≥25 毫克/分升)类别发生糖尿病前期/2 型糖尿病的风险更大,危险比(95% 置信区间)分别为 1.26(1.11-1.44)、1.32(1.15-1.51)和 1.69(1.51-1.90);这一问题在女性中更为突出(交互作用 P = 0.005)。这些类别的人群罹患 2 型糖尿病的风险也更高。进一步调整胰岛素抵抗平衡模型评估后,结果基本保持不变。即使在 FPG 正常值较低的个体中(即,结论:在血糖正常的人群中,2 h-PG 低至 9 mg/dL 的水平高于 FPG 是糖尿病前期/2 型糖尿病发展的先兆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linking extent of return to fasting state after oral glucose tolerance test to future risk of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: Insights from the TLGS.

Aims: To assess the risk of difference between 2 h post-load plasma glucose (2 h-PG) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) on incident prediabetes/type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among normoglycemic individuals.

Methods: Among 4,971 individuals aged ≥20 years, the associations of the difference between 2 h-PG and FPG with outcomes were examined using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis. Participants were categorized into three groups: a low post-load group (2 h-PG ≤ FPG, as the reference group); a high post-load group (2 h-PG > FPG and ≥75th percentile of the difference); and a medium post-load group (2 h-PG > FPG and <75th percentile of the difference), which was further categorized into three groups by equal ranges.

Results: Over a median of 11.5 years of follow-up, 2,331 new cases of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes and 360 cases of type 2 diabetes occurred. Greater risks of incident prediabetes/type 2 diabetes in second (9-16 mg/dL) and third (17-24 mg/dL) medium post-load, as well as high post-load (≥25 mg/dL) categories, were found, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.26 (1.11-1.44), 1.32 (1.15-1.51), and 1.69 (1.51-1.90), respectively; the issue was more prominent among women (P for interaction = 0.005). The risk of incident type 2 diabetes was also higher for these categories. After further adjustment for the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, result remained essentially unchanged. Even among individuals with low normal FPG (i.e., <90 mg/dL), ≥9 mg/dL difference between 2 h-PG and FPG increased the risk of composite prediabetes/ type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions: Greater levels of 2 h-PG as low as 9 mg/dL than FPG among normoglycemic individuals is a harbinger of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence-based body composition analysis using computed tomography images predicts both prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus. Association between severity of diabetic complications and risk of cancer in middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes. Toward a cure for diabetes: iPSC and ESC-derived islet cell transplantation trials. The health-economic impact of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio testing for chronic kidney disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Trends in prescribing sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for individuals with type 2 diabetes with and without cardiovascular-renal disease in South Korea, 2015-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1