Peeter Karihtala, Outi Laatikainen, Samuli Tuominen, Trude Ågesen, Rasmus Eliasen
{"title":"BRCA1/2致病基因变异携带者早期乳腺癌的发病率、预后和医疗资源利用情况:一项基于芬兰人群的研究。","authors":"Peeter Karihtala, Outi Laatikainen, Samuli Tuominen, Trude Ågesen, Rasmus Eliasen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Data on real-world prevalence and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCAm) breast cancer is sparse.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An observational cohort study including all patients diagnosed with incident early-stage breast cancer and recorded in Helsinki University Hospital data lake 2012-2022, accounting for one-third of the Finnish breast cancer patient population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,696 incident early-stage breast cancer patients, 11.2% (n = 1,644) were tested for gBRCAm. Of the tested population, 7.4% (n = 122) carried gBRCAm. Of the 122 gBRCAm patients, 95.1% (n = 116) were women, with a median age at diagnosis of 46.4 years. Among the same patient group, HER2 status was available for 87.7% (n = 107) of the patients. Among these, 49.5% (n = 53) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer, 13.1% were (n = 14) HER2-positive, and 37.3% (n = 40) of patients had triple-negative breast cancer. The tested patients were significantly younger compared with non-tested patients. No significant differences in overall survival or healthcare resource utilization between the tested patients with gBRCAm and gBRCA wild-type (gBRCAwt) were observed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This comprehensive observational study supports previous findings of gBRCAm prevalence in the Western early-stage breast cancer population. While no differences in survival were observed between patients with gBRCAm and gBRCAwt, it is important to consider the potential influence of selection bias, particularly due to the younger gBRCAm testing target population and the overall low frequency of testing. Therefore, a substantial proportion of the patients carrying gBRCAm likely remained undiagnosed, and wider screening criteria are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"736-745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence, prognosis, and health care resource utilization in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1/2 with incident early-stage breast cancer: a Finnish population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Peeter Karihtala, Outi Laatikainen, Samuli Tuominen, Trude Ågesen, Rasmus Eliasen\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Data on real-world prevalence and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCAm) breast cancer is sparse.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An observational cohort study including all patients diagnosed with incident early-stage breast cancer and recorded in Helsinki University Hospital data lake 2012-2022, accounting for one-third of the Finnish breast cancer patient population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,696 incident early-stage breast cancer patients, 11.2% (n = 1,644) were tested for gBRCAm. Of the tested population, 7.4% (n = 122) carried gBRCAm. Of the 122 gBRCAm patients, 95.1% (n = 116) were women, with a median age at diagnosis of 46.4 years. Among the same patient group, HER2 status was available for 87.7% (n = 107) of the patients. Among these, 49.5% (n = 53) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer, 13.1% were (n = 14) HER2-positive, and 37.3% (n = 40) of patients had triple-negative breast cancer. The tested patients were significantly younger compared with non-tested patients. No significant differences in overall survival or healthcare resource utilization between the tested patients with gBRCAm and gBRCA wild-type (gBRCAwt) were observed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This comprehensive observational study supports previous findings of gBRCAm prevalence in the Western early-stage breast cancer population. While no differences in survival were observed between patients with gBRCAm and gBRCAwt, it is important to consider the potential influence of selection bias, particularly due to the younger gBRCAm testing target population and the overall low frequency of testing. Therefore, a substantial proportion of the patients carrying gBRCAm likely remained undiagnosed, and wider screening criteria are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"736-745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence, prognosis, and health care resource utilization in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1/2 with incident early-stage breast cancer: a Finnish population-based study.
Background and purpose: Data on real-world prevalence and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCAm) breast cancer is sparse.
Material and methods: An observational cohort study including all patients diagnosed with incident early-stage breast cancer and recorded in Helsinki University Hospital data lake 2012-2022, accounting for one-third of the Finnish breast cancer patient population.
Results: Among 14,696 incident early-stage breast cancer patients, 11.2% (n = 1,644) were tested for gBRCAm. Of the tested population, 7.4% (n = 122) carried gBRCAm. Of the 122 gBRCAm patients, 95.1% (n = 116) were women, with a median age at diagnosis of 46.4 years. Among the same patient group, HER2 status was available for 87.7% (n = 107) of the patients. Among these, 49.5% (n = 53) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer, 13.1% were (n = 14) HER2-positive, and 37.3% (n = 40) of patients had triple-negative breast cancer. The tested patients were significantly younger compared with non-tested patients. No significant differences in overall survival or healthcare resource utilization between the tested patients with gBRCAm and gBRCA wild-type (gBRCAwt) were observed.
Interpretation: This comprehensive observational study supports previous findings of gBRCAm prevalence in the Western early-stage breast cancer population. While no differences in survival were observed between patients with gBRCAm and gBRCAwt, it is important to consider the potential influence of selection bias, particularly due to the younger gBRCAm testing target population and the overall low frequency of testing. Therefore, a substantial proportion of the patients carrying gBRCAm likely remained undiagnosed, and wider screening criteria are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.