BRCA1/2致病基因变异携带者早期乳腺癌的发病率、预后和医疗资源利用情况:一项基于芬兰人群的研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Acta Oncologica Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829
Peeter Karihtala, Outi Laatikainen, Samuli Tuominen, Trude Ågesen, Rasmus Eliasen
{"title":"BRCA1/2致病基因变异携带者早期乳腺癌的发病率、预后和医疗资源利用情况:一项基于芬兰人群的研究。","authors":"Peeter Karihtala, Outi Laatikainen, Samuli Tuominen, Trude Ågesen, Rasmus Eliasen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Data on real-world prevalence and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCAm) breast cancer is sparse.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An observational cohort study including all patients diagnosed with incident early-stage breast cancer and recorded in Helsinki University Hospital data lake 2012-2022, accounting for one-third of the Finnish breast cancer patient population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,696 incident early-stage breast cancer patients, 11.2% (n = 1,644) were tested for gBRCAm. Of the tested population, 7.4% (n = 122) carried gBRCAm. Of the 122 gBRCAm patients, 95.1% (n = 116) were women, with a median age at diagnosis of 46.4 years. Among the same patient group, HER2 status was available for 87.7% (n = 107) of the patients. Among these, 49.5% (n = 53) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer, 13.1% were (n = 14) HER2-positive, and 37.3% (n = 40) of patients had triple-negative breast cancer. The tested patients were significantly younger compared with non-tested patients. No significant differences in overall survival or healthcare resource utilization between the tested patients with gBRCAm and gBRCA wild-type (gBRCAwt) were observed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This comprehensive observational study supports previous findings of gBRCAm prevalence in the Western early-stage breast cancer population. While no differences in survival were observed between patients with gBRCAm and gBRCAwt, it is important to consider the potential influence of selection bias, particularly due to the younger gBRCAm testing target population and the overall low frequency of testing. Therefore, a substantial proportion of the patients carrying gBRCAm likely remained undiagnosed, and wider screening criteria are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence, prognosis, and health care resource utilization in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1/2 with incident early-stage breast cancer: a Finnish population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Peeter Karihtala, Outi Laatikainen, Samuli Tuominen, Trude Ågesen, Rasmus Eliasen\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Data on real-world prevalence and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCAm) breast cancer is sparse.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An observational cohort study including all patients diagnosed with incident early-stage breast cancer and recorded in Helsinki University Hospital data lake 2012-2022, accounting for one-third of the Finnish breast cancer patient population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,696 incident early-stage breast cancer patients, 11.2% (n = 1,644) were tested for gBRCAm. Of the tested population, 7.4% (n = 122) carried gBRCAm. Of the 122 gBRCAm patients, 95.1% (n = 116) were women, with a median age at diagnosis of 46.4 years. Among the same patient group, HER2 status was available for 87.7% (n = 107) of the patients. Among these, 49.5% (n = 53) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer, 13.1% were (n = 14) HER2-positive, and 37.3% (n = 40) of patients had triple-negative breast cancer. The tested patients were significantly younger compared with non-tested patients. No significant differences in overall survival or healthcare resource utilization between the tested patients with gBRCAm and gBRCA wild-type (gBRCAwt) were observed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This comprehensive observational study supports previous findings of gBRCAm prevalence in the Western early-stage breast cancer population. While no differences in survival were observed between patients with gBRCAm and gBRCAwt, it is important to consider the potential influence of selection bias, particularly due to the younger gBRCAm testing target population and the overall low frequency of testing. Therefore, a substantial proportion of the patients carrying gBRCAm likely remained undiagnosed, and wider screening criteria are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:有关确诊患有 BRCA1 或 BRCA2(gBRCAm)致病性种系变异的乳腺癌患者的实际患病率和预后的数据非常稀少:一项观察性队列研究,包括2012-2022年赫尔辛基大学医院数据湖中记录的所有早期乳腺癌患者,占芬兰乳腺癌患者总数的三分之一:在14696名早期乳腺癌患者中,11.2%(n=1644)的患者接受了gBRCAm检测。在接受检测的人群中,7.4%(n = 122)携带 gBRCAm。在这 122 名 gBRCAm 患者中,95.1%(n = 116)为女性,诊断时的中位年龄为 46.4 岁。在同一患者群体中,87.7%(107 人)的患者具有 HER2 状态。其中,49.5%的患者(53人)为激素受体阳性(HR+)、HER2阴性乳腺癌,13.1%的患者(14人)为HER2阳性,37.3%的患者(40人)为三阴性乳腺癌。与未接受检测的患者相比,接受检测的患者明显更年轻。接受检测的 gBRCAm 患者与 gBRCA 野生型(gBRCAwt)患者在总生存期或医疗资源利用率方面没有明显差异:这项全面的观察性研究支持了之前关于西方早期乳腺癌人群中 gBRCAm 患病率的研究结果。虽然没有观察到 gBRCAm 和 gBRCAwt 患者的生存率存在差异,但考虑到选择偏差的潜在影响也很重要,特别是由于 gBRCAm 检测目标人群较年轻,且检测频率总体较低。因此,有相当一部分携带 gBRCAm 的患者可能仍未得到诊断,因此需要制定更广泛的筛查标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence, prognosis, and health care resource utilization in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1/2 with incident early-stage breast cancer: a Finnish population-based study.

Background and purpose: Data on real-world prevalence and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCAm) breast cancer is sparse.

Material and methods: An observational cohort study including all patients diagnosed with incident early-stage breast cancer and recorded in Helsinki University Hospital data lake 2012-2022, accounting for one-third of the Finnish breast cancer patient population.

Results: Among 14,696 incident early-stage breast cancer patients, 11.2% (n = 1,644) were tested for gBRCAm. Of the tested population, 7.4% (n = 122) carried gBRCAm. Of the 122 gBRCAm patients, 95.1% (n = 116) were women, with a median age at diagnosis of 46.4 years. Among the same patient group, HER2 status was available for 87.7% (n = 107) of the patients. Among these, 49.5% (n = 53) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer, 13.1% were (n = 14) HER2-positive, and 37.3% (n = 40) of patients had triple-negative breast cancer. The tested patients were significantly younger compared with non-tested patients. No significant differences in overall survival or healthcare resource utilization between the tested patients with gBRCAm and gBRCA wild-type (gBRCAwt) were observed.

Interpretation: This comprehensive observational study supports previous findings of gBRCAm prevalence in the Western early-stage breast cancer population. While no differences in survival were observed between patients with gBRCAm and gBRCAwt, it is important to consider the potential influence of selection bias, particularly due to the younger gBRCAm testing target population and the overall low frequency of testing. Therefore, a substantial proportion of the patients carrying gBRCAm likely remained undiagnosed, and wider screening criteria are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
期刊最新文献
Progression-free survival versus post-progression survival and overall survival in WHO grade 2 gliomas. Assessment of radiation pneumonitis and predictive factors in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Classic Kaposi sarcoma: Diagnostics, treatment modalities, and genetic implications - A review of the literature. Prognostic factors and overall survival among patients with ovarian cancer in the pre-PARP inhibitor era: the OCRWE-Finland study. Real-life treatment patterns and time to next treatment among patients with ovarian cancer in the pre-PARP inhibitor era: the OCRWE-Finland Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1