Daiwa Brain Health(北海道扇贝油质原)和 Prevagen(Apoaequorin)对认知功能的影响比较:办公室试点研究。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Fred Pescatore
{"title":"Daiwa Brain Health(北海道扇贝油质原)和 Prevagen(Apoaequorin)对认知功能的影响比较:办公室试点研究。","authors":"Fred Pescatore","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Daiwa Brain Health, which contains Hokkaido scallop oil plasmalogen, was compared with Prevagen, the market leader in the category of cognitive function improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty people with subjective cognitive decline or its premorbidities were divided into 2 groups of 15 people each, and each group was given either Daiwa Brain Health or Prevagen for 90 days. The Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) were conducted before treatment and after 90 days of treatment to evaluate cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who took Daiwa Brain Health showed statistically significant improvement in AMTS and SMMSE scores between baseline and 90 days of treatment, while participants who took Prevagen showed no statistically significant improvement in AMTS or SMMSE scores between baseline and after 90 days of treatment. The AMTS and SMMSE scores indicated higher cognitive function at 90 days after treatment for the participants who took Daiwa Brain Health compared with those who took Prevagen, and those differences were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daiwa Brain Health is more effective than Prevagen at improving cognitive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Daiwa Brain Health (Hokkaido Scallop Oil Plasmalogen) and Prevagen (Apoaequorin) on Cognitive Function: An In-Office Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Fred Pescatore\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Daiwa Brain Health, which contains Hokkaido scallop oil plasmalogen, was compared with Prevagen, the market leader in the category of cognitive function improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty people with subjective cognitive decline or its premorbidities were divided into 2 groups of 15 people each, and each group was given either Daiwa Brain Health or Prevagen for 90 days. The Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) were conducted before treatment and after 90 days of treatment to evaluate cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who took Daiwa Brain Health showed statistically significant improvement in AMTS and SMMSE scores between baseline and 90 days of treatment, while participants who took Prevagen showed no statistically significant improvement in AMTS or SMMSE scores between baseline and after 90 days of treatment. The AMTS and SMMSE scores indicated higher cognitive function at 90 days after treatment for the participants who took Daiwa Brain Health compared with those who took Prevagen, and those differences were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daiwa Brain Health is more effective than Prevagen at improving cognitive function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的方法:将含有北海道扇贝油质原的大和脑健康与改善认知功能的市场领先产品普瑞发源进行比较:方法:将 30 名主观认知能力下降或有前驱症状的人分为两组,每组 15 人,每组服用大和脑康健或普瑞巴林 90 天。在治疗前和治疗 90 天后分别进行简短智力测验评分(AMTS)和标准化小型精神状态检查(SMMSE),以评估认知功能:结果:服用大和脑康片的受试者在基线和90天治疗后的AMTS和SMMSE得分均有统计学意义的显著改善,而服用普瑞巴林的受试者在基线和90天治疗后的AMTS和SMMSE得分均无统计学意义的显著改善。与服用普瑞丸的患者相比,服用大和脑康片的患者在治疗 90 天后的 AMTS 和 SMMSE 分数表明其认知功能更强,这些差异在统计学上有显著意义:结论:在改善认知功能方面,大和脑康健比普瑞发源更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Daiwa Brain Health (Hokkaido Scallop Oil Plasmalogen) and Prevagen (Apoaequorin) on Cognitive Function: An In-Office Pilot Study.

Objective: Daiwa Brain Health, which contains Hokkaido scallop oil plasmalogen, was compared with Prevagen, the market leader in the category of cognitive function improvement.

Methods: Thirty people with subjective cognitive decline or its premorbidities were divided into 2 groups of 15 people each, and each group was given either Daiwa Brain Health or Prevagen for 90 days. The Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) and Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) were conducted before treatment and after 90 days of treatment to evaluate cognitive function.

Results: Participants who took Daiwa Brain Health showed statistically significant improvement in AMTS and SMMSE scores between baseline and 90 days of treatment, while participants who took Prevagen showed no statistically significant improvement in AMTS or SMMSE scores between baseline and after 90 days of treatment. The AMTS and SMMSE scores indicated higher cognitive function at 90 days after treatment for the participants who took Daiwa Brain Health compared with those who took Prevagen, and those differences were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Daiwa Brain Health is more effective than Prevagen at improving cognitive function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1