英国乳腺肿瘤诊断性种系遗传检测的 BRCA-DIRECT 数字化路径:随机、非劣效试验。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY British Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1038/s41416-024-02832-2
Bethany Torr, Christopher Jones, Grace Kavanaugh, Monica Hamill, Sophie Allen, Subin Choi, Alice Garrett, Mikel Valganon-Petrizan, Suzanne MacMahon, Lina Yuan, Rosalind Way, Helena Harder, Rochelle Gold, Amy Taylor, Rhian Gabe, Anneke Lucassen, Ranjit Manchanda, Lesley Fallowfield, Valerie Jenkins, Ashu Gandhi, D. Gareth Evans, Angela George, Michael Hubank, Zoe Kemp, Stephen Bremner, Clare Turnbull
{"title":"英国乳腺肿瘤诊断性种系遗传检测的 BRCA-DIRECT 数字化路径:随机、非劣效试验。","authors":"Bethany Torr, Christopher Jones, Grace Kavanaugh, Monica Hamill, Sophie Allen, Subin Choi, Alice Garrett, Mikel Valganon-Petrizan, Suzanne MacMahon, Lina Yuan, Rosalind Way, Helena Harder, Rochelle Gold, Amy Taylor, Rhian Gabe, Anneke Lucassen, Ranjit Manchanda, Lesley Fallowfield, Valerie Jenkins, Ashu Gandhi, D. Gareth Evans, Angela George, Michael Hubank, Zoe Kemp, Stephen Bremner, Clare Turnbull","doi":"10.1038/s41416-024-02832-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genetic testing to identify germline high-risk pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes is increasingly part of the breast cancer diagnostic pathway. Novel patient-centred pathways may offer opportunity to expand capacity and reduce turnaround time. We recruited 1140 women with unselected breast cancer to undergo germline genetic testing through the BRCA-DIRECT pathway (which includes a digital platform, postal saliva sampling and a genetic counsellor telephone helpline). Ahead of consenting to the test, participants were randomised to receive information about genetic testing digitally (569/1140, 49.9%) or via a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (571/1140, 50.1%). 1001 (87.8%) participants progressed to receive their pre-test information and consented to testing. The primary outcome, uptake of genetic testing, was higher amongst participants randomised to receive digital information compared with those randomised to a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (90.8% (95% CI: 88.5% to 93.1%) vs 84.7% (95% CI: 81.8% to 87.6%), p = 0.002, adjusted for participant age and site). Non-inferiority was observed in relation to patient knowledge, anxiety, and satisfaction. Findings demonstrate that standardised, digital information offers a non-inferior alternative to conventional genetic counselling, and an end-to-end patient-centred, digital pathway (supported by genetic counselling hotline) could feasibly be implemented into breast oncology settings. The study is registered with, and protocol available on, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04842799).","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02832-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Torr, Christopher Jones, Grace Kavanaugh, Monica Hamill, Sophie Allen, Subin Choi, Alice Garrett, Mikel Valganon-Petrizan, Suzanne MacMahon, Lina Yuan, Rosalind Way, Helena Harder, Rochelle Gold, Amy Taylor, Rhian Gabe, Anneke Lucassen, Ranjit Manchanda, Lesley Fallowfield, Valerie Jenkins, Ashu Gandhi, D. Gareth Evans, Angela George, Michael Hubank, Zoe Kemp, Stephen Bremner, Clare Turnbull\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41416-024-02832-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Genetic testing to identify germline high-risk pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes is increasingly part of the breast cancer diagnostic pathway. Novel patient-centred pathways may offer opportunity to expand capacity and reduce turnaround time. We recruited 1140 women with unselected breast cancer to undergo germline genetic testing through the BRCA-DIRECT pathway (which includes a digital platform, postal saliva sampling and a genetic counsellor telephone helpline). Ahead of consenting to the test, participants were randomised to receive information about genetic testing digitally (569/1140, 49.9%) or via a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (571/1140, 50.1%). 1001 (87.8%) participants progressed to receive their pre-test information and consented to testing. The primary outcome, uptake of genetic testing, was higher amongst participants randomised to receive digital information compared with those randomised to a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (90.8% (95% CI: 88.5% to 93.1%) vs 84.7% (95% CI: 81.8% to 87.6%), p = 0.002, adjusted for participant age and site). Non-inferiority was observed in relation to patient knowledge, anxiety, and satisfaction. Findings demonstrate that standardised, digital information offers a non-inferior alternative to conventional genetic counselling, and an end-to-end patient-centred, digital pathway (supported by genetic counselling hotline) could feasibly be implemented into breast oncology settings. The study is registered with, and protocol available on, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04842799).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02832-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02832-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-024-02832-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:进行基因检测以确定乳腺癌易感基因中的种系高危致病变异,正日益成为乳腺癌诊断途径的一部分。以患者为中心的新途径可为扩大检测能力和缩短检测周期提供机会:我们通过 BRCA-DIRECT 途径(包括数字平台、邮寄唾液采样和遗传咨询师电话帮助热线)招募了 1140 名未选定乳腺癌患者接受种系遗传检测。在同意接受检测之前,参与者被随机分配到通过数字平台(569/1140,49.9%)或通过检测前遗传咨询(571/1140,50.1%)接受遗传检测信息:结果:1001 名参与者(87.8%)接受了检测前信息并同意进行检测。与随机接受检测前遗传咨询的参与者相比,随机接受数字信息的参与者接受基因检测的比例更高(90.8% (95% CI: 88.5% to 93.1%) vs 84.7% (95% CI: 81.8% to 87.6%),p = 0.002,根据参与者年龄和地点进行调整)。在患者知识、焦虑和满意度方面,观察到非劣效性:研究结果表明,标准化的数字信息可替代传统的遗传咨询,以患者为中心的端到端数字路径(由遗传咨询热线提供支持)可在乳腺肿瘤学环境中实施:该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04842799)上注册,其方案可在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04842799)上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial
Genetic testing to identify germline high-risk pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes is increasingly part of the breast cancer diagnostic pathway. Novel patient-centred pathways may offer opportunity to expand capacity and reduce turnaround time. We recruited 1140 women with unselected breast cancer to undergo germline genetic testing through the BRCA-DIRECT pathway (which includes a digital platform, postal saliva sampling and a genetic counsellor telephone helpline). Ahead of consenting to the test, participants were randomised to receive information about genetic testing digitally (569/1140, 49.9%) or via a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (571/1140, 50.1%). 1001 (87.8%) participants progressed to receive their pre-test information and consented to testing. The primary outcome, uptake of genetic testing, was higher amongst participants randomised to receive digital information compared with those randomised to a pre-test genetic counselling consultation (90.8% (95% CI: 88.5% to 93.1%) vs 84.7% (95% CI: 81.8% to 87.6%), p = 0.002, adjusted for participant age and site). Non-inferiority was observed in relation to patient knowledge, anxiety, and satisfaction. Findings demonstrate that standardised, digital information offers a non-inferior alternative to conventional genetic counselling, and an end-to-end patient-centred, digital pathway (supported by genetic counselling hotline) could feasibly be implemented into breast oncology settings. The study is registered with, and protocol available on, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04842799).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Cardiotoxicity following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer. Low-dose arsenic trioxide inhibits pancreatic stellate cell activation via LOXL3 expression to enhance immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Perioperative safety of risk-reducing mastectomy. Cancer and treatment specific incidence rates of immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Real-world evidence for pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1