评估体脂指数对抗高血压药物反应的影响。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16265
Duygun Altıntaş Aykan, Ahmet Çağrı Aykan, Enes Çelik, Bayram Öztürk
{"title":"评估体脂指数对抗高血压药物反应的影响。","authors":"Duygun Altıntaş Aykan, Ahmet Çağrı Aykan, Enes Çelik, Bayram Öztürk","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Less than 50% of patients treated for hypertension reach a target office systolic blood pressure (SBP). We aimed to evaluate the role of adiposity on antihypertensive drug responses in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Estimated glomerular filtration rates, body mass index (BMI), skinfold thickness (SFT), body surface areas and waist circumferences of 150 hypertensive patients naïve to treatment were measured. Treatment protocols were started as combination of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) plus calcium channel blocker (CCB), angiotensin receptor blocker plus CCB or ACE-I plus diuretic. Pre-treatment and change in blood pressure (ΔBP) after 4 weeks treatment were determined. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to find independent predictors of Δblood pressure changes, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to find independent predictors of target SBP < 140 mmHg at 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients reached the target systolic pressure of <140 mmHg at 4 weeks. Triceps, mid-abdomen and subscapular SFT were significantly thicker in the uncontrolled blood pressure group (P = .011, P = .006 and P = .016, respectively). Pretreatment SBP (r = 0.644), pretreatment diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (r = 0.188), subscapular SFT (r = -0.318), suprailiac SFT (r = -0.211) and ΔDBP (r = 0.433) were correlated with ΔSBP in correlation analysis. Pretreatment SBP (β = 0.644, 95% CI = 0.697-0.993, P < .001), subscapular SFT (β = -0.253, 95% CI = -0.886--0.329, P < .001), pretreatment DBP (β = -0.380, 95% CI = -0.1001- -0.453, P = .001) and ΔDBP (β = 0.401, 95% CI = 0.377-0.796, P < .001) were independent predictors of ΔSBP in multivariable linear regression analysis. Subscapular SFT was an independent predictor of target SBP < 140 mmHg in multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.895, 95% CI = 0.832-0.963, P = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subscapular SFT may be a valuable marker for prediction of response to antihypertensive drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the influence of body fat indices on antihypertensive drug responses.\",\"authors\":\"Duygun Altıntaş Aykan, Ahmet Çağrı Aykan, Enes Çelik, Bayram Öztürk\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Less than 50% of patients treated for hypertension reach a target office systolic blood pressure (SBP). We aimed to evaluate the role of adiposity on antihypertensive drug responses in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Estimated glomerular filtration rates, body mass index (BMI), skinfold thickness (SFT), body surface areas and waist circumferences of 150 hypertensive patients naïve to treatment were measured. Treatment protocols were started as combination of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) plus calcium channel blocker (CCB), angiotensin receptor blocker plus CCB or ACE-I plus diuretic. Pre-treatment and change in blood pressure (ΔBP) after 4 weeks treatment were determined. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to find independent predictors of Δblood pressure changes, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to find independent predictors of target SBP < 140 mmHg at 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 patients reached the target systolic pressure of <140 mmHg at 4 weeks. Triceps, mid-abdomen and subscapular SFT were significantly thicker in the uncontrolled blood pressure group (P = .011, P = .006 and P = .016, respectively). Pretreatment SBP (r = 0.644), pretreatment diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (r = 0.188), subscapular SFT (r = -0.318), suprailiac SFT (r = -0.211) and ΔDBP (r = 0.433) were correlated with ΔSBP in correlation analysis. Pretreatment SBP (β = 0.644, 95% CI = 0.697-0.993, P < .001), subscapular SFT (β = -0.253, 95% CI = -0.886--0.329, P < .001), pretreatment DBP (β = -0.380, 95% CI = -0.1001- -0.453, P = .001) and ΔDBP (β = 0.401, 95% CI = 0.377-0.796, P < .001) were independent predictors of ΔSBP in multivariable linear regression analysis. Subscapular SFT was an independent predictor of target SBP < 140 mmHg in multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.895, 95% CI = 0.832-0.963, P = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subscapular SFT may be a valuable marker for prediction of response to antihypertensive drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16265\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在接受治疗的高血压患者中,只有不到50%的患者能达到办公室收缩压(SBP)目标值。我们旨在评估脂肪对新诊断的高血压患者降压药物反应的作用:方法:测量了 150 名刚接受治疗的高血压患者的估计肾小球滤过率、体重指数 (BMI)、皮褶厚度 (SFT)、体表面积和腰围。治疗方案为血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)联合钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合 CCB 或 ACE-I 联合利尿剂。测定了治疗前和治疗 4 周后的血压变化(ΔBP)。采用多元线性回归分析找出Δ血压变化的独立预测因素,并采用多变量二元逻辑回归分析找出目标 SBP 的独立预测因素:共有 104 名患者达到了目标收缩压:肩胛下 SFT 可能是预测降压药物反应的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the influence of body fat indices on antihypertensive drug responses.

Aims: Less than 50% of patients treated for hypertension reach a target office systolic blood pressure (SBP). We aimed to evaluate the role of adiposity on antihypertensive drug responses in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

Methods: Estimated glomerular filtration rates, body mass index (BMI), skinfold thickness (SFT), body surface areas and waist circumferences of 150 hypertensive patients naïve to treatment were measured. Treatment protocols were started as combination of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) plus calcium channel blocker (CCB), angiotensin receptor blocker plus CCB or ACE-I plus diuretic. Pre-treatment and change in blood pressure (ΔBP) after 4 weeks treatment were determined. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to find independent predictors of Δblood pressure changes, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to find independent predictors of target SBP < 140 mmHg at 4 weeks.

Results: A total of 104 patients reached the target systolic pressure of <140 mmHg at 4 weeks. Triceps, mid-abdomen and subscapular SFT were significantly thicker in the uncontrolled blood pressure group (P = .011, P = .006 and P = .016, respectively). Pretreatment SBP (r = 0.644), pretreatment diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (r = 0.188), subscapular SFT (r = -0.318), suprailiac SFT (r = -0.211) and ΔDBP (r = 0.433) were correlated with ΔSBP in correlation analysis. Pretreatment SBP (β = 0.644, 95% CI = 0.697-0.993, P < .001), subscapular SFT (β = -0.253, 95% CI = -0.886--0.329, P < .001), pretreatment DBP (β = -0.380, 95% CI = -0.1001- -0.453, P = .001) and ΔDBP (β = 0.401, 95% CI = 0.377-0.796, P < .001) were independent predictors of ΔSBP in multivariable linear regression analysis. Subscapular SFT was an independent predictor of target SBP < 140 mmHg in multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR = 0.895, 95% CI = 0.832-0.963, P = .003).

Conclusions: Subscapular SFT may be a valuable marker for prediction of response to antihypertensive drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to predict potential drug-drug interactions of dersimelagon (MT-7117). Sustainable medicines development and use: Challenges and opportunities in the sustainable production of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Economic burden of hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in France: The IATROSTAT-ECO study. Colchicine effect on biomarkers of cardiac remodelling and atherosclerosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A randomized controlled trial. Evaluating the capability of ChatGPT in predicting drug-drug interactions: Real-world evidence using hospitalized patient data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1