建立不同 Ad26.COV2.S 疫苗接种方案后人体抗体动态模型。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16251
Anna Dari, Juan José Pérez Ruixo, Mathieu Le Gars, Frank Struyf, Philippe Jacqmin
{"title":"建立不同 Ad26.COV2.S 疫苗接种方案后人体抗体动态模型。","authors":"Anna Dari, Juan José Pérez Ruixo, Mathieu Le Gars, Frank Struyf, Philippe Jacqmin","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop a semimechanistic model that describes the kinetic profile and variability of antibody (Ab) concentrations following vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at different doses and dosing intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from participants randomized into 5 clinical trials receiving the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. The model considered key elements of humoral immune response, dose proportionality and the evolutionary processes of the immune response. Interindividual variability and covariates were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fast and slow kinetic phases of Ab and their evolution over time were differentiated. After first and second administrations, Ab concentrations of both phases increased less than dose proportionally, indicating a saturation of B-cell production processes. Ab concentrations produced during the fast kinetic phase increased significantly after the second administration, indicating an underlying evolutive process after antigen exposures. For the slow kinetic phase, a less pronounced increase occurred after the second and third administrations but was relatively higher in subjects who had low concentrations after the first administration. Ab concentrations of the slow phase were higher in females and decreased with age. After multiple administrations, the fast phase had Ab maximum concentrations about 5 times higher than the slow phase. The limiting kinetic factors in the fast and slow phases were the elimination rates of Ab itself and Ab producing cells, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model appears suitable to quantitatively describe the inter- and intraindividual kinetics of the immune response and the impact of covariates after multiple administrations of a vaccine.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling antibody dynamics in humans after different Ad26.COV2.S vaccination schemes.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Dari, Juan José Pérez Ruixo, Mathieu Le Gars, Frank Struyf, Philippe Jacqmin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop a semimechanistic model that describes the kinetic profile and variability of antibody (Ab) concentrations following vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at different doses and dosing intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from participants randomized into 5 clinical trials receiving the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. The model considered key elements of humoral immune response, dose proportionality and the evolutionary processes of the immune response. Interindividual variability and covariates were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fast and slow kinetic phases of Ab and their evolution over time were differentiated. After first and second administrations, Ab concentrations of both phases increased less than dose proportionally, indicating a saturation of B-cell production processes. Ab concentrations produced during the fast kinetic phase increased significantly after the second administration, indicating an underlying evolutive process after antigen exposures. For the slow kinetic phase, a less pronounced increase occurred after the second and third administrations but was relatively higher in subjects who had low concentrations after the first administration. Ab concentrations of the slow phase were higher in females and decreased with age. After multiple administrations, the fast phase had Ab maximum concentrations about 5 times higher than the slow phase. The limiting kinetic factors in the fast and slow phases were the elimination rates of Ab itself and Ab producing cells, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model appears suitable to quantitatively describe the inter- and intraindividual kinetics of the immune response and the impact of covariates after multiple administrations of a vaccine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16251\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立一个半机械模型,以描述不同剂量和给药间隔接种 Ad26.COV2.S 疫苗后抗体(Ab)浓度的动力学特征和变异性:方法:从随机参加 5 项接种 Ad26.COV2.S 疫苗临床试验的参与者中收集数据。该模型考虑了体液免疫反应、剂量比例和免疫反应演变过程的关键因素。研究还探讨了个体间的变异性和协变量:结果:Ab 的快速和慢速动力学阶段及其随时间的演变是有区别的。在第一次和第二次给药后,两个阶段的 Ab 浓度增长均低于剂量比例,这表明 B 细胞生成过程已达到饱和。快速动力学阶段产生的抗体浓度在第二次给药后显著增加,表明抗原暴露后存在潜在的演变过程。至于慢动作阶段,在第二次和第三次给药后出现的增长并不明显,但在第一次给药后浓度较低的受试者中浓度相对较高。女性体内的慢动作阶段抗体浓度较高,并随着年龄的增长而降低。多次给药后,快速阶段的 Ab 最大浓度约为慢速阶段的 5 倍。快慢期的限制动力学因素分别是 Ab 本身和产生 Ab 的细胞的清除率:该模型似乎适合定量描述多次接种疫苗后免疫反应的个体间和个体内动力学以及协变量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling antibody dynamics in humans after different Ad26.COV2.S vaccination schemes.

Aims: To develop a semimechanistic model that describes the kinetic profile and variability of antibody (Ab) concentrations following vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S at different doses and dosing intervals.

Methods: Data were collected from participants randomized into 5 clinical trials receiving the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. The model considered key elements of humoral immune response, dose proportionality and the evolutionary processes of the immune response. Interindividual variability and covariates were explored.

Results: Fast and slow kinetic phases of Ab and their evolution over time were differentiated. After first and second administrations, Ab concentrations of both phases increased less than dose proportionally, indicating a saturation of B-cell production processes. Ab concentrations produced during the fast kinetic phase increased significantly after the second administration, indicating an underlying evolutive process after antigen exposures. For the slow kinetic phase, a less pronounced increase occurred after the second and third administrations but was relatively higher in subjects who had low concentrations after the first administration. Ab concentrations of the slow phase were higher in females and decreased with age. After multiple administrations, the fast phase had Ab maximum concentrations about 5 times higher than the slow phase. The limiting kinetic factors in the fast and slow phases were the elimination rates of Ab itself and Ab producing cells, respectively.

Conclusion: The model appears suitable to quantitatively describe the inter- and intraindividual kinetics of the immune response and the impact of covariates after multiple administrations of a vaccine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to predict potential drug-drug interactions of dersimelagon (MT-7117). Sustainable medicines development and use: Challenges and opportunities in the sustainable production of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Economic burden of hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in France: The IATROSTAT-ECO study. Colchicine effect on biomarkers of cardiac remodelling and atherosclerosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A randomized controlled trial. Evaluating the capability of ChatGPT in predicting drug-drug interactions: Real-world evidence using hospitalized patient data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1